OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

OpenText and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 6.5, while Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,804 Views
1,606 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

9,620 Views
7,119 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Trellix seems to have the upper hand with its broader integration capabilities, making it a preferred choice for larger enterprises.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers central management capabilities, encryption, device control, and data loss prevention. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides robust security features, lightweight operations, and is ideal for environments with limited resources.

Room for Improvement: Trellix users note the need for enhanced reporting functions and reduced resource consumption during scans. OpenText Core users desire better customer support response times, improved documentation, and consolidation of information.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix supports on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments, with customer service rated positively for technical expertise. OpenText Core focuses primarily on public cloud deployment, with efficient customer service, though some users experience resolution time delays.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is positioned as a more expensive solution, justified by extensive features and integration capabilities, offering a significant ROI. OpenText Core is cost-effective, providing value for smaller budgets, but users wish for more flexible pricing tiers.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.8%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution include the endpoint navigation protection, the protection related to the EMS service, as well as the control and the cloud integration capabilities."

"There aren't any features that really stand out — I just want it to keep malware out of my system. To date, I haven't had any malware in my system."

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very scalable."

"Valuable features include good scanning, very light footprint and management console that the client can access and (just as important) in which I can see status of groups of computers (I am a consultant, IT role)."

"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful."

"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"Trellix Endpoint Security is a proven, robust, and cost-effective solution that protects the organization from different types of ransomware and attacks."

"MVISION offers decent protection."

"The EPO, the ePolicy Orchestrator, is the best endpoint protection central management system."

"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."

"Provides protection against threats."

"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."

"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."

"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"There needs to be more advanced analytics. It would make it a more powerful antivirus solution within the marketplace."

"It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it."

"An updated UI would be nice, but is not hardly used."

"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

"It would be great if there was a feature which would allow you to scan an individual file on an endpoint user's computer."

"One of the biggest pain points is that it's not really ransomware-oriented. They will be able to catch some, but that's where Sentinel One is a better player compared to Webroot."

"Its detection capability for certain attacks should be improved. It should have better and wider detection for certain malware attacks. It could also have some sort of RMN."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"If there's a possibility for remote assistance or investigation support in the future, it would be beneficial. Currently, we use another remote software for such purposes. If this feature could be included in the next version, that would be an improvement. The feature is called Remote Administration. I'm somewhat satisfied, but there's an issue I recently encountered. When attempting to scan a suspected host machine, Symantec Endpoint Security did not provide any alerts. However, when we installed Malwarebytes and ran a scan, it detected a threat that wasn't identified by Symantec. We raised this concern with the team for resolution, and the investigation is still ongoing."

"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."

"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."

"It has very good integrations. However, its integration with Palo Alto was not good, and they seem to be working on it at the backend. It is not very resource-hungry, but it can be even better in terms of resource utilization. It could be improved in terms of efficiency, memory sizing, and disk consumption by agents."

"The endpoint has room for improvement because it's restrictive, it's very sensitive. Sometimes it can delete something that you need and so sometimes you have to disable the antivirus."

"The solution has problematic encryption, which needs reforming."

"It is a bit technical. The user interface has some significant limitations, mainly when using HIPS on the server side, to protect files from being changed or deleted by hackers, users, or administrators."

"We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

"It is relatively cheap."

"The pricing is high."

"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year."

"Its price is very high. It is higher than its competitors, and it should be less."

"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."

"McAfee's prices are flexible and can be quite competitive, although there are other solutions that are even more so."

"Its price is reasonable, but it could be made free."

"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."

"No comment."

"The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 18% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

July 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

August 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.