Parasoft SOAtest and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers compete in the functional testing space. Parasoft SOAtest appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive end-to-end testing capabilities.
Features:Parasoft SOAtest provides scalability, custom rule-checking, and efficient integration with other tools. It supports scripting and data-driven testing across a wide range of protocols and languages. In contrast, OpenText focuses on developer integration, supporting C# and Java, with flexibility across platforms.
Room for Improvement:Parasoft SOAtest could improve its resource use, cryptography support, and licensing costs. Users also suggest better usability in reporting and UI, along with setup and workspace management. OpenText faces performance issues, lacks support for some tools, and struggles with scaling. Better integration with mobile and cloud tech is needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Parasoft SOAtest supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment, offering robust technical support. It receives high ratings for assistance. OpenText supports on-premises deployment with some cloud capability, but users report challenges with support availability and communication.
Pricing and ROI:Parasoft SOAtest is expensive with a complex licensing structure but offers significant ROI through efficient test creation. OpenText is similarly priced but seen as high for its features, lacking better alternatives. Both offer potential ROI with strategic use.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
