Parasoft SOAtest and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers are key contenders in the software testing category. Parasoft SOAtest has a slight upper hand with its comprehensive API support and virtualization capabilities that promote seamless automation.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest enables comprehensive functional test scenario setups using WSDL or XSD and supports extensive data-driven testing with various data sources. It integrates custom scripting, aiding in enhanced API support and tool variety. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers integrates smoothly with languages like C# and Java, enhancing productivity by aligning with existing tools and workflows. It is praised for its modern integration capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users report excessively detailed reports for non-technical audiences and suggest UI and test management tool integration improvements. Workspace stability and data source handling are concerns. OpenText could enhance object recognition and CI/CD pipeline integration. While supporting multiple environments, it struggles with seamless performance on desktop applications, and users suggest more robust automation and licensing flexibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest mainly offers on-premises deployment, with effective but sometimes slow technical support. OpenText offers both on-premises and public cloud deployments, beneficial for cloud-oriented enterprises. Its customer service is generally positive, with technical support providing prompt assistance. Both products could enhance the efficiency and accessibility of their technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is known for its comprehensive features, resulting in higher costs with significant ROI despite its expensive licensing. OpenText, also high-priced, offers productivity enhancements that justify its value for developer teams. It provides flexible licensing options suitable for dynamic team sizes, yet some users still find its pricing steep.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| Parasoft SOAtest | 0.9% |
| Other | 96.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
