OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Qt Squish compete in the software testing category. Qt Squish appears to have the upper hand due to its exceptional feature set that justifies its higher cost, despite OpenText's favorable pricing and support reviews.
Features: Qt Squish excels in handling complex algorithms and integrates seamlessly with platforms like Eclipse and Visual Studio. It supports testing across different platforms without relying on screenshots and offers full control via command line tools. OpenText focuses on automated GUI testing, smooth Jenkins integration catering to DevOps, and extensive application support, renowned for its stability and automation capabilities.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could benefit from enhanced stability and more straightforward licensing. Reducing reliance on specific programming languages and integration improvements are advisable. Qt Squish requires enhanced object identification and improved integration with newer platforms. Users seek better performance testing features and flexible pricing options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products support on-premises deployment, with OpenText offering public cloud options which cater to varied user needs. User feedback on OpenText's technical and customer support reveals mixed experiences with noted recent improvements. Qt Squish provides competent customer service but is critiqued for its response time and problem-resolution efficiency.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText's complex licensing is often seen as costly, yet users highlight significant savings from test automation over manual testing, proving economical overall. Qt Squish’s licensing is simpler but still deemed expensive; however, its superior feature set is worth the investment for many users. Both solutions offer substantial ROI when widely implemented across teams, enhancing automation and resource optimization.
For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Qt Squish | 3.4% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.5% |
| Other | 94.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
