OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Qt Squish are competitive automated testing tools within the software development industry. Qt Squish appears to have an advantage for Qt applications due to its adeptness at mapping UI components and seamless integration with CI systems.
Features: OpenText provides comprehensive compatibility with various IDEs, including Eclipse and Visual Studio, offering AI-driven object recognition, and integration with ALM and Jenkins for enhanced DevOps practices. Qt Squish excels in automating Qt control testing and supports versatile scripting languages such as Python, making it suitable across complex platforms while minimizing screen dependency.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance browser compatibility beyond Safari and streamline integration with open-source tools like Selenium, while also improving stability, performance, and parallel task execution. Qt Squish users seek enhancement in object identification capabilities and a better IDE experience, with requests for improved BDD integration and Git functionality.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing is adaptable in both on-premises and public cloud environments but sometimes lacks prompt technical support. Qt Squish users find on-premises deployment satisfactory and praise the engaging technical support, though they desire faster response times for critical issues.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers extensive features justifying its higher cost, often seen as steep compared to open-source alternatives. Similarly, Qt Squish is noted for being on the pricier side with limited flexible pricing options. Both tools achieve significant ROI by reducing manual testing costs up to 80% and improving efficiency across teams.
For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Qt Squish | 3.2% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.8% |
| Other | 94.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
Take the complexity out of testing graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs) – even in the face of product evolution and safety-critical applications.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
