OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and ReadyAPI compete in the testing software category. OpenText has the upper hand in handling complex algorithms and integration with developer tools, while ReadyAPI excels in API testing and tool integration.
Features: OpenText is known for handling complex algorithms, compatibility with multiple programming languages like Java and C#, and integration with ALM and Jenkins. ReadyAPI offers comprehensive API testing, supports various API types, and provides robust analytics through dashboards.
Room for Improvement: OpenText needs enhancements in technology support and compatibility with newer web technologies, and improved integration with ALM. ReadyAPI could expand its protocol support beyond SOAP and REST services and improve usability for cloud environments and version control.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both OpenText and ReadyAPI are mostly on-premises solutions with some cloud capabilities. Customer service reviews are mixed; OpenText has improved its support structure, while ReadyAPI users appreciate responsiveness but desire more stability.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is expensive, with a license price of $10,000 or more, offering significant ROI through efficiency. ReadyAPI provides flexible pricing, starting around $750 per user annually, allowing economical scaling and proving beneficial for API testing.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
ReadyAPI is a versatile tool for creating multiple testing frameworks and validating various parameters seamlessly.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
