Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Lookout, and Recorded Future. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] surpasses its competitors by offering real-time threat analytics, comprehensive threat intelligence datasets, and seamless integration with other Microsoft security products to enhance cybersecurity defenses across organizations.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced threat detection and EDR capabilities, appealing to users needing enhanced endpoint visibility. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] benefits from strong integration with Microsoft products, offering a cost-effective solution for organizations utilizing Microsoft services.
CrowdStrike Falcon typically involves a relatively higher setup cost due to its advanced features, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for those seeking basic threat protection.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically involves a relatively higher setup cost due to its advanced features, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for those seeking basic threat protection.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Lookout appeals to budget-conscious organizations with its competitive pricing and quick deployment, ideal for mobile endpoint protection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers extensive features and seamless Azure integration, beneficial for enterprises needing advanced analytics and comprehensive threat intelligence.
Lookout setup cost is minimal, providing cost-effective options, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence presents a substantial initial investment, highlighting varied pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Lookout setup cost is minimal, providing cost-effective options, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence presents a substantial initial investment, highlighting varied pricing strategies.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
Recorded Future provides customizable threat intelligence and dark web monitoring, ideal for detailed analysis. In comparison, Microsoft Defender integrates seamlessly within Microsoft's ecosystem, making it suitable for existing users seeking real-time threat detection and broader protection within a unified suite.
Recorded Future includes a comprehensive setup cost, highlighting a robust integration process, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a simpler setup with potentially lower initial costs, emphasizing efficiency in implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Recorded Future includes a comprehensive setup cost, highlighting a robust integration process, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a simpler setup with potentially lower initial costs, emphasizing efficiency in implementation.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
VirusTotal is appreciated for its ease of integration and cost-effectiveness, offering multi-antivirus scanning and a simple interface. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence provides advanced threat analysis and comprehensive insights, making it suitable for users valuing depth and detailed cyber-intelligence.
VirusTotal offers straightforward setup without significant upfront costs, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence incurs higher initial expenses with expansive features.
View comparison
Pricing
VirusTotal offers straightforward setup without significant upfront costs, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence incurs higher initial expenses with expansive features.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Anomali provides comprehensive threat intelligence and customizable alerts. In comparison, Microsoft Defender excels in integration capabilities, making it ideal for Microsoft-centric organizations. Anomali offers flexibility and competitive pricing. Meanwhile, Microsoft Defender enables streamlined operations through its seamless integration with Microsoft services.
Anomali offers a customizable setup fee, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence provides a straightforward approach with clear setup costs. This highlights Anomali's flexibility against the transparency offered by Microsoft Defender in setup pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Anomali offers a customizable setup fee, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence provides a straightforward approach with clear setup costs. This highlights Anomali's flexibility against the transparency offered by Microsoft Defender in setup pricing.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series excels in advanced threat management across multi-cloud environments with granular control and scalability. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers seamless integration within Microsoft’s ecosystem, leveraging global signals for real-time threat analysis and detection.
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series incurs a notable upfront setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a lower initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series incurs a notable upfront setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a lower initial expenditure.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Digital Guardian
3.7 out of 5
Digital Guardian is favored for deployment ease and strong customer service, appealing to businesses valuing personalized support. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] is chosen for its feature-rich capabilities and seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, appealing to those seeking comprehensive coverage.
Digital Guardian requires a higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers a low-cost implementation option. Their pricing differences reflect varying feature sets and targeting strategies in threat management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital Guardian requires a higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers a low-cost implementation option. Their pricing differences reflect varying feature sets and targeting strategies in threat management solutions.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
ZeroFOX
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
ZeroFOX
4.3 out of 5
ZeroFOX excels with social media threat protection and straightforward deployment appealing to clients prioritizing simplicity. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers deep integration with Microsoft products, ideal for organizations seeking extensive security analytics despite a potentially higher setup cost.
ZeroFOX has higher setup costs, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers competitive pricing for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
ZeroFOX has higher setup costs, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers competitive pricing for budget-conscious users.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
4.2 out of 5
ThreatConnect TIP offers advanced threat analysis and customization, appealing for its adaptable integration. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence provides robust cloud-native detection and integration with Microsoft 365, attracting tech buyers with its comprehensive features and real-time insights for seamless security enhancement.
ThreatConnect TIP offers a structured setup cost, while Microsoft Defender EOL's setup is more flexible.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatConnect TIP offers a structured setup cost, while Microsoft Defender EOL's setup is more flexible.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall offers advanced firewall features with extensive network protection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence provides seamless integration across Microsoft products. Barracuda emphasizes scalable management, while Microsoft focuses on threat identification and data security within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall requires an upfront investment for setup, whereas Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers a more straightforward installation process without significant initial costs. The difference highlights varying approaches to accessibility and deployment complex...
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall requires an upfront investment for setup, whereas Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers a more straightforward installation process without significant initial costs. The difference highlights varying approaches to accessibility and deployment complex...
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSandbox offers strong threat protection with customizable integration and zero-day handling. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence excels in integrating threat data within its ecosystem. Fortinet may suit budget-conscious buyers, while Microsoft appeals to those preferring comprehensive threat intelligence.
Fortinet FortiSandbox has an initial setup cost that is straightforward and competitive, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] involves a more complex setup process, impacting installation time and effort.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSandbox has an initial setup cost that is straightforward and competitive, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] involves a more complex setup process, impacting installation time and effort.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
CyberInt Argos
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
CyberInt Argos
1 out of 5
CyberInt Argos appeals with cost-effective threat detection focusing on external risks, making it ideal for businesses seeking targeted intelligence. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers seamless Microsoft ecosystem integration with extensive features, suitable for those prioritizing comprehensive protection within existing Microsoft investments.
CyberInt Argos has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] entails a complex setup process. Their setup costs reflect these differences, with CyberInt Argos being more budget-friendly upfront than Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL].
View comparison
Pricing
CyberInt Argos has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] entails a complex setup process. Their setup costs reflect these differences, with CyberInt Argos being more budget-friendly upfront than Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL].
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] suits organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem with its easy integration and cost-effective pricing. In comparison, SOCRadar offers advanced threat intelligence and adaptable deployment, appealing to those seeking comprehensive features and a higher return on investment.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers streamlined setup with competitive costs, while SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers streamlined setup with competitive costs, while SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Cyble Vision
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Cyble Vision
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] integrates seamlessly with Microsoft’s ecosystem, enhancing threat detection. In comparison, Cyble Vision offers broader threat intelligence with extensive feeds and real-time alerts, suiting companies seeking comprehensive external insights despite a more involved deployment process and higher initial cost.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a more expensive setup cost compared to Cyble Vision, highlighting a potential budget consideration for organizations evaluating these solutions. Cyble Vision provides a cost-effective alternative with a lower initial financial commitm...
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a more expensive setup cost compared to Cyble Vision, highlighting a potential budget consideration for organizations evaluating these solutions. Cyble Vision provides a cost-effective alternative with a lower initial financial commitm...
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Cisco Threat Grid
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Cisco Threat Grid
3.8 out of 5
Cisco Threat Grid excels with advanced malware analysis and seamless integration into the Cisco ecosystem. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers broad coverage with AI-driven insights, appealing to those valuing comprehensive threat intelligence and integration with Microsoft security tools.
Cisco Threat Grid offers a straightforward setup process with clear initial costs, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] may require more complex configurations, impacting overall deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Threat Grid offers a straightforward setup process with clear initial costs, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] may require more complex configurations, impacting overall deployment expenses.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Flare
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] Logo
Flare
1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers seamless integration with Microsoft's tools, simplifying deployment for existing customers. In comparison, Flare provides in-depth intelligence and third-party integration, appealing to those needing advanced features and flexible customer service. Pricing favors Microsoft users, while Flare promises substantial ROI with a richer feature set.
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a straightforward setup, whereas Flare involves a more complex initial configuration. Microsoft provides a more user-friendly onboarding experience compared to Flare, highlighting a key difference in setup ease.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] offers a straightforward setup, whereas Flare involves a more complex initial configuration. Microsoft provides a more user-friendly onboarding experience compared to Flare, highlighting a key difference in setup ease.

Related categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
Microsoft Security Suite