IBM Rational Performance Tester vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

IBM and Parasoft are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. IBM is ranked #23, while Parasoft is ranked #26. IBM holds a 2.3% mindshare in TMT, compared to Parasoft’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Read 17 IBM Rational Performance Tester reviews

754 Views
279 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft Development Testin...

Read 4 Parasoft Development Testing Platform reviews

609 Views
189 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Parasoft Development Testin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

IBM Rational Performance Tester and Parasoft Development Testing Platform serve distinct purposes in the software development lifecycle. Parasoft Development Testing Platform appears to have the upper hand because of its comprehensive feature set, despite IBM Rational Performance Tester being appreciated for its pricing and support.

Features: IBM Rational Performance Tester offers features such as load testing, performance testing, and robust accuracy. Parasoft Development Testing Platform provides static analysis, unit testing, and code coverage metrics. Users find Parasoft's features more extensive and versatile.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Performance Tester needs improvements in user experience, integration flexibility, and additional tool compatibility. Parasoft Development Testing Platform could benefit from better reporting features, reduced setup complexity, and more intuitive UI enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Performance Tester is noted for straightforward deployment and satisfactory customer service. Parasoft Development Testing Platform’s deployment is more complex, but robust support aids in the installation process, ensuring users are well-assisted.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Performance Tester offers cost-effective solutions with a quick return on investment, making it attractive for budget-conscious projects. Parasoft Development Testing Platform has higher setup costs but delivers long-term ROI through enhancement of development quality and efficiency. Users find Parasoft's comprehensive features worth the investment.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Parasoft Development Testin...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (20th), Application Requirements Management (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Performance Tester is 2.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft Development Testing Platform is 1.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Rational Performance Tester	2.3%
Parasoft Development Testing Platform	1.8%
Other	95.9%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support

There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies.

Read full review

Edmund Suarez

Sr. Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable

We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests Our customers require that we perform static analysis and have no critical high errors. We must also have 100 percent code coverage for my test to verify that everything is good and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."

"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."

"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."

"The most valuable feature is code coverage."

Cons

"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."

"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."

"The solution's speed has room for improvement."

"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."

"Costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Real Estate/Law Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 26% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 22% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 13% of the time

Visual Studio Test Professional vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 10% of the time

TestRail vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Rational Performance Tester Competitors

PractiTest vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Compared 27% of the time

Jira vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Compared 17% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Codebeamer vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Compared 16% of the time

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester

January 2026

Download IBM Rational Performance Tester product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

December 2025

Parasoft Development Testing Platform report

Download Parasoft Development Testing Platform product report

Also Known As

Rational Performance Tester

Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP

Overview

IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.

IBM

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t. Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

Parasoft

Sample Customers

andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell,

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform

December 2025

Free Report: IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Performance Tester vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.