Eggplant Test vs IBM Rational Performance Tester comparison

Keysight Technologies and IBM are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #24. Keysight Technologies holds a 5.3% mindshare in TMT, compared to IBM’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 18 Eggplant Test reviews

398 Views
94 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Read 17 IBM Rational Performance Tester reviews

119 Views
56 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

IBM Rational Performance Tester and Eggplant Test are well-known testing tools with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Users appear more satisfied with Eggplant Test's features and consider it worth the price, though IBM Rational Performance Tester also has many valuable aspects.

Features: IBM Rational Performance Tester is praised for its accurate load testing, robust reporting capabilities, and enhanced script maintenance. Users value Eggplant Test for its strong automation features, support for multiple platforms, and intelligent object recognition. Eggplant Test stands out due to its versatility and comprehensive automation, making it a preferred choice among users.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Performance Tester users suggest enhancements in its integration capabilities, a more modern approach to testing processes, and better user interface. Eggplant Test users highlight the need for better documentation, improved stability in certain scenarios, and more efficient technical support. Both products have specific areas flagged by users for improvement, but the feedback for Eggplant Test is more focused on documentation rather than functional capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Performance Tester receives mixed feedback on its deployment, with some users finding it complex. However, its customer service is praised for being responsive. Eggplant Test is noted for its straightforward deployment process but receives mixed reviews on customer service, with some users considering it less responsive than desired. Eggplant Test has an edge in deployment simplicity, while IBM Rational Performance Tester has more responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Performance Tester is noted for a higher setup cost but delivers good ROI in large-scale environments. Eggplant Test is seen as competitively priced and offers satisfactory ROI. Eggplant Test has a favorable perception regarding its pricing and ROI among users compared to IBM Rational Performance Tester.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Management Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Test Automation Tools (13th)

IBM Rational Performance Te...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 5.3%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational Performance Tester is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Tayyaba Noreen

Student at SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability

There was no free trial in it. So, I studied it through a page that tells how it works. It will be good if a free trial is provided for users. Moreover, I would like to give some feedback on the installation process. There are other tools that are much easier to install and get started with. Eggplant could improve its installation process.

Read full review

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Supports web and mobile applications, very scalable, very stable, and wonderful support

There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Eggplant Test is valuable due to its OCR technology, which is independent of underlying technologies and can identify applications based on labels such as 'username' and 'password'."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

"Good text reading ability."

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"The solution is a stable one."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

More Eggplant Test pros

"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."

"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."

Cons

"It has low productivity."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"The reporting function is a bit shallow. The solution does not offer very comprehensive reporting in terms of your test results. The reporting time and the logs are very high level as well. These areas need improvement."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

More Eggplant Test cons

"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."

"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Eggplant Manager?

The solution is a stable one.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 21% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Eggplant Test

Compared 9% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 57% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 26% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester

Compared 18% of the time

More IBM Rational Performance Tester Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

June 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Performance Tester

June 2025

Download IBM Rational Performance Tester product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Rational Performance Tester

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.

IBM

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester

June 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.