HP Wolf Security vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert comparison

HP and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. HP is ranked #45, while Kaspersky is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.3. HP holds a 1.8% mindshare in EDR, compared to Kaspersky’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 9, 2026

HP Wolf Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert compete in the endpoint protection category. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and robust security management capabilities.

Features: HP Wolf Security provides advanced isolation and containment capabilities essential for ensuring endpoint protection. The system can isolate all untrusted content systematically. A unique feature is a secure browser designed for high-risk web activities. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers robust threat detection, automated investigation systems, and an adaptive response mechanism. It includes machine learning designed to improve detection accuracy while reducing false positives. The system provides comprehensive dashboards for SOC teams, enhancing threat management and analysis.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security could improve by enhancing integration with additional third-party security tools and expanding its forensic analysis capabilities. It may also benefit from advanced threat intelligence features. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert can focus on simplifying its initial setup process and enhancing integration with various IT ecosystems. A more intuitive user interface and reducing the complexity of some of its advanced functions could also add value.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, making it suitable for teams with limited IT resources. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert requires a more involved setup, supported by detailed documentation and professional services, which can be beneficial for larger organizations with complex security needs.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is cost-effective, providing strong security features at competitive prices, positively impacting return on investment. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert may have a higher initial cost but delivers extensive features that offer significant long-term value and protection, justifying the investment for businesses focused on comprehensive endpoint security.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,454 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 1.8%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Next EDR Expert is 1.2%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.7%
Kaspersky Next EDR Expert	1.2%
HP Wolf Security	1.8%
Other	93.3%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Ravi-Upadhyay

Founder at Inspira Enterprise

Provides strong threat detection and response through behavior analytics and network isolation

I have found the most valuable features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert to be its ability to tackle the biggest challenges customers face when they have to mitigate any kind of a malware, ransomware attack, or online theft scenarios. The solution utilizes its HIPS, which is the host intrusion prevention system, behavior analytics system, and device control mechanism, making the antivirus capabilities of EDR quite strong. It is able to detect zero-day threats as well as historical or legacy malware, providing protection against current threats in the market and legacy malware. My opinion on the advanced threat detection algorithms in Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is that the ATP functionality is quite strong because it utilizes the behavioral analytics engine in the backend, which employs machine learning mechanisms to identify any kind of vulnerability or exploit running on the operating system level and the network level. If an attack is about to happen on the endpoint, it is able to protect over the network as well and checks for any illegitimate encryption activities. The machine learning capability within Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has contributed to improving detection accuracy and reducing false positives in my environment by helping me identify malicious activity and differentiate between any malicious activity on the operating system level and on the network level. I have seen customers with in-house developed applications that have no public signatures available. Once I whitelist a particular application, it intelligently whitelists not only the executable but also all the dependent services required to run that application. Furthermore, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has successfully blocked network-level attacks on the endpoint. For example, during a recent DoS attack aimed at choking the entire network, Kaspersky detected the attack, isolated the device in a sandbox network, and alerted my SOC team via email for corrective action, thereby proactively helping me detect and protect devices from malicious attacks.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cortex is a very good total solution on the endpoints."

"Stability is one of the features we like the most."

"Being a cloud solution it is very flexible in serving internal and external connections and a broad range of devices."

"The most valuable features are incident creation, policy-based protection, IP whitelisting, and device encryption. These are beneficial for endpoint and server security."

"The solution allows us to gain remote access without the user's knowledge and take the necessary actions on the device."

"If you are looking for security, mainly for advanced threat prevention from ransomware and malware attacks, I would recommend Cortex."

"The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service."

"The solution doesn't need a high level of technical training."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Our security posture has improved; it has definitely contained and prevented some malicious attacks from happening."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"Looking at it in the big picture of the risk that you're mitigating and the protection that you're getting, it's phenomenal."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

More HP Wolf Security pros

"It's scalable enough for us."

"The performance for Kaspersky is good, and it's not impacted our client performance."

"In terms of effectiveness, it's the best; it is easy to set up, the product is stable, and we can scale the solution."

"Kaspersky is easy to use, and it performs well."

"We particularly appreciate how scalable this solution is, as we often need to increase our end-user numbers."

"Kaspersky is one of the best, and we are working with it today."

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."

"EDR's most valuable feature is its basic protection from malware and viruses."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert pros

Cons

"Although I would say this product is highly-rated, it could probably do more because nothing does everything that you want."

"There is a severe gap in functionality between Windows, Linux, and Mac versions. For example all folder restriction settings are Windows only. Traps 5.0+ does not have SAML / LDAP integration."

"In some cases, there are too many options for me, and it is a bit too hard to find some settings which I really need to implement."

"I have seen lagging with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. There was one time when we faced a threat actor trying to gain access to our system. When our team utilized the tool, we were all on the same dashboard and we faced a lag issue at that time of around five minutes, which was quite significant."

"The negative aspect I see is the economic model used by Palo Alto."

"The GUI could be improved."

"Additionally, I think the price is very high, and if it can be adjusted, I believe it will be a very good solution."

"If they had pulse rate detection, it would be better."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."

"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"The solution can improve by providing automatic fixing of vulnerabilities and reducing the resources used in the server component and endpoint agent. They are very bulky and use a lot of CPU, memory, and hard drive resources."

"Kaspersky needs to strengthen its standing in the market."

"The main problem with Endpoint is that Kaspersky is a Russian company, and my clients prefer not to use it."

"The solution is expensive."

"The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well."

"I would like better integration with other products."

"Kaspersky EDR currently has limited OS support. They only focus on Windows Server and Windows."

"We would like to have better strategic information."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"Endpoint's pricing is good, especially compared to expensive solutions like Sophos."

"If one is cheap, ten is expensive, I rate the product’s price as a seven out of ten, especially if I compare it with CrowdStrike."

"EDR is priced on the cheaper side. Licensing for EDR is available on a yearly basis for around 80 SAR a year."

"Kaspersky is licensed on a yearly basis."

"There is an annual license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price overall is a bit expensive when compared to other solutions. There are not any additional fees other than the license."

"The license for EDR costs about 1,000 pesos per user. I would rate the pricing as four out of five."

"We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better."

"Kaspersky's pricing is very competitive when it comes to comparison with the other solutions."

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,454 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The price of the solution is economical.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

The user interface of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert could be more intuitive, and I would appreciat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

My usual use cases for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert involve detecting ransomware earlier and proa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 10% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 5% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 11% of the time

TrendAI Vision One vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 8% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 4% of the time

Cynet vs Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Compared 3% of the time

More Kaspersky Next EDR Expert Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

August 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

August 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

August 2026

Download Kaspersky Next EDR Expert product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Bromium vSentry

Kaspersky EDR

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

HP Wolf Security provides robust protection against malware and security threats by isolating untrusted content and offering a secure browsing experience. It combines high-performance protection with user-friendly operations, aiming to keep devices secure without hindering productivity.

HP Wolf Security focuses on preventing malware infections through content isolation. Its virtualized browser ensures high-risk activities do not lead to incidents by removing malware upon session closure. Features like LAVA alerts offer in-depth analysis, making management reporting more efficient. While adjustments are required for better Windows adaptation and broader browser support, it continues to offer significant security advantages. Compatibility challenges and resource usage during browsing and document tasks highlight areas for improvement.

What key features define HP Wolf Security?

Isolation Feature: Prevents malware infection by isolating untrusted content.
Secure Browser: Manages high-risk activities safely and removes threats post-session.
LAVA Alerts: Provides detailed analysis for enhanced management reporting.
Micro VM Protection: Office and PDF files are safely handled with reduced vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Seamless Usability: Combines security with user-friendly operations.
Enhanced Protection: Reduces vulnerabilities across different file types.
Cost-effective Solution: Offers significant security features at a competitive price.
Management Efficiency: Improved reporting and analysis for better decision-making.

In the healthcare sector, HP Wolf Security assists in processing large imaging files efficiently, important for radiology departments. It offers an additional safety layer for laptops in dynamic environments and is pre-installed on many devices, functioning comparably to Norton 360 for comprehensive endpoint protection.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a robust cybersecurity tool that delivers protection against cyberthreats while enhancing visibility and response capabilities for IT security teams.

This comprehensive solution integrates with Endpoint Protection Platform to block and detect cyberthreats while providing tools for IT security professionals. Backed by 30 years of experience, it is trusted by over 600 enterprise customers, safeguarding more than 2.5 million endpoints across the globe. The system is built with a powerful set of detection engines, enabling proactive threat investigation with clear visualization. It features an open architecture supporting broad integration capabilities, making it versatile for diverse IT environments.

What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses machine learning and behavior analytics to identify sophisticated threats.
Comprehensive Endpoint Protection: Provides robust security measures, including intrusion prevention and firewall capabilities.
Open Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Kaspersky SIEM, Endpoint Security, and third-party workflows.
Embedded Sandbox: Analyzes suspicious files in depth to determine threat levels.
Centralized Management: Facilitates encryption and reporting for enhanced usability.

What benefits can users expect when using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert?

Effective Security: Offers reliable protection against malware and ransomware.
Scalability: Designed to support expanding infrastructures.
Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with centralized control.
Responsive Support: Provides swift assistance for technical issues.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and corporate IT, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is employed for network and endpoint security, shielding against malware, zero-day threats, and unauthorized access. It empowers these sectors with enhanced threat intelligence, secure data protection, and effective patch management, facilitating robust protection across diverse ecosystems.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Valspar

Ferrari, Insolar, Tael, Republic of Serbia

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

August 2026

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,454 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.