Top 10 Hitachi NAS Platform Alternatives

3.6 out of 5

12 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Hitachi NAS Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Hitachi NAS Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerScale (Isilon), IBM FlashSystem, and NetApp FAS Series. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Hitachi NAS Platform surpasses its competitors by offering advanced data management, high scalability, robust security, and seamless integration capabilities, ensuring efficient storage solutions for enterprise needs while enhancing data access speed and reliability across diverse IT infrastructures.

Hitachi Vantara Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hitachi Vantara, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dell PowerScale (Isilon)

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerScale (Isilon)

4.5 out of 5

Hitachi NAS Platform is known for efficient storage management and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Dell PowerScale excels in scalability and cloud integration, making it suitable for feature-demanding environments. Tech buyers choose Hitachi for budget-friendly options and Dell for advanced capabilities.

Download Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs. Hitachi NAS Platform Report

Pricing

The Hitachi NAS Platform setup cost is competitive, while Dell PowerScale (Isilon) demands a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

The Hitachi NAS Platform setup cost is competitive, while Dell PowerScale (Isilon) demands a higher initial investment.

IBM FlashSystem

4.1 out of 5

IBM FlashSystem

4.1 out of 5

Hitachi NAS Platform offers robust scalability for large-scale operations, ideal for budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, IBM FlashSystem enhances performance with high-speed data access and advanced analytics, appealing to those seeking superior technology and long-term savings despite higher initial costs.

Download Hitachi NAS Platform vs. IBM FlashSystem Report

Pricing

Hitachi NAS Platform offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial investment, while IBM FlashSystem requires a higher upfront cost, potentially offset by its advanced flash technology.

View comparison

Pricing

Hitachi NAS Platform offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial investment, while IBM FlashSystem requires a higher upfront cost, potentially offset by its advanced flash technology.

NetApp FAS Series

4.4 out of 5

NetApp FAS Series

4.4 out of 5

NetApp FAS Series attracts enterprises with cost-effectiveness, superior data management, and easy deployment. In comparison, Hitachi NAS Platform appeals with robust features, extensive scalability, and performance analytics, making it suitable for those prioritizing advanced capabilities despite potentially complex implementation.

Download Hitachi NAS Platform vs. NetApp FAS Series Report

Pricing

NetApp FAS Series offers straightforward setup costs, while Hitachi NAS Platform presents a more complex pricing structure with variable installation fees.

View comparison

Pricing

NetApp FAS Series offers straightforward setup costs, while Hitachi NAS Platform presents a more complex pricing structure with variable installation fees.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

4.3 out of 5

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

4.3 out of 5

HPE 3PAR StoreServ attracts tech buyers with its cost-effective scalability and efficiency. In comparison, Hitachi NAS Platform offers superior reliability and performance, making it ideal for high-demand environments. HPE is easier to deploy, while Hitachi provides better customer support and long-term ROI.

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Hitachi NAS Platform Report

Pricing

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers competitive setup costs with scalable options, whereas Hitachi NAS Platform presents a higher initial investment focused on robust data management capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers competitive setup costs with scalable options, whereas Hitachi NAS Platform presents a higher initial investment focused on robust data management capabilities.

Qumulo

3.9 out of 5

Qumulo

3.9 out of 5

Hitachi NAS Platform appeals with its robust support and cost-effective pricing for predictable storage. In comparison, Qumulo is preferred for scalability and real-time analytics, offering higher initial investment but promising ROI through adaptive infrastructure and detailed data insights.

Download Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Qumulo Report

Pricing

Hitachi NAS Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Qumulo, offering a cost-effective solution, while Qumulo provides advanced features justifying its higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Hitachi NAS Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Qumulo, offering a cost-effective solution, while Qumulo provides advanced features justifying its higher initial investment.

Huawei OceanStor 9000

4.3 out of 5

Huawei OceanStor 9000

4.3 out of 5

Hitachi NAS Platform suits those needing smooth deployment with robust data protection and scalability. In comparison, Huawei OceanStor 9000 appeals with high performance and advanced data management, ideal for large-scale deployments despite higher initial costs.

Download Hitachi NAS Platform vs. Huawei OceanStor 9000 Report

Pricing

Hitachi NAS Platform features a straightforward setup process with competitive pricing, while Huawei OceanStor 9000 presents higher initial costs due to its sophisticated configuration and comprehensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

NetApp Private Storage

4.3 out of 5

NetApp Private Storage

4.3 out of 5

Hitachi NAS Platform is favored for its competitive pricing, effective data management, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, NetApp Private Storage appeals with its cloud integration, advanced security features, and superior long-term ROI, despite higher initial costs and a more comprehensive support structure.

Download Hitachi NAS Platform vs. NetApp Private Storage Report

Pricing

Hitachi NAS Platform setup cost is higher but offers extensive features, while NetApp Private Storage has lower setup expenses, appealing to budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Hitachi NAS Platform setup cost is higher but offers extensive features, while NetApp Private Storage has lower setup expenses, appealing to budget-conscious users.

IBM Scale-out NAS

1 out of 5

IBM Scale-out NAS

1 out of 5

IBM Scale-out NAS (SONAS) is a solution for cloud storage implementations. It is designed to consolidate files that are scattered in multiple storage locations and allow them to be efficiently shared and managed.

View comparison

Related categories

NAS

File and Object Storage

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)