No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo

Top 10 Fortinet FortiEDR Alternatives

Vendor: Fortinet
4.0 out of 5
Leave a reviewWhy PeerSpot?

Top Fortinet FortiEDR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Fortinet FortiEDR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Fortinet FortiEDR surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, real-time response capabilities, and robust endpoint protection, ensuring comprehensive security with minimal system impact and seamless integration within existing security infrastructures.

Fortinet Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortinet, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.3 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides endpoint protection by detecting and blocking malware. It integrates with firewalls, enhances security with AI-driven threat detection, and offers behavior-based analysis. Praised for its user-friendly interface, it ensures endpoint safety but faces challenges like integration issues, high memory usage, and compatibility differences.

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
I feel it is fairly priced.
The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.
View comparison
Pricing
I feel it is fairly priced.
The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.4 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR offers advanced AI-driven threat detection and seamless cloud deployment, appealing to large enterprises. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR provides cost-effective, integrated security solutions suitable for businesses using Fortinet's ecosystem, prioritizing ease of use and affordable pricing.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR offers a streamlined setup process with predictable costs, while Fortinet FortiEDR presents a competitive setup price strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR offers a streamlined setup process with predictable costs, while Fortinet FortiEDR presents a competitive setup price strategy.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers cost-effective pricing and strong customer support. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides advanced integration with Microsoft products and extensive threat detection. Fortinet FortiEDR's automation is appealing, while Defender's comprehensive security can justify its higher cost. Both have unique advantages for different buyer needs.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which tends to be higher due to its extensive features.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which tends to be higher due to its extensive features.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity excels in behavior AI detection and automated responses, providing comprehensive endpoint visibility. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR integrates seamlessly within Fortinet ecosystems with detailed forensic data and automated incident response, making it ideal for users within the Fortinet environment.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, emphasizing its advanced features and robust capabilities. Fortinet FortiEDR provides a more cost-effective setup, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, emphasizing its advanced features and robust capabilities. Fortinet FortiEDR provides a more cost-effective setup, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious users.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in data handling and integration, ideal for large enterprises, though it requires improvement in cost structure. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers competitive pricing and user-friendly features, making it attractive for small to mid-sized companies.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a more cost-effective setup solution.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar incurs higher initial setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a more cost-effective setup solution.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is praised for its comprehensive threat detection, automated processes, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Elastic Security excels with advanced threat hunting, flexibility, and extensive integrations. Fortinet FortiEDR offers simpler deployment and support, while Elastic Security's higher cost is justified by superior functionality.
Download Elastic Security vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, whereas Elastic Security offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, whereas Elastic Security offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in integration with SIEM or SOAR solutions, providing advanced threat prevention and comprehensive security. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers real-time threat visibility with seamless integration into Fortinet's infrastructure, appealing to those prioritizing streamlined security fabric integration.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is reported to be higher, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform's setup cost is reported to be higher, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in deployment flexibility and competitive pricing with robust security measures. In comparison, TrendAI Vision One offers superior analytics with extensive threat detection and centralized management. Tech buyers may choose Fortinet for cost-effectiveness, while TrendAI provides flexible modular pricing and comprehensive protection.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. TrendAI Vision One Report
Fortinet FortiEDR involves an initial setup cost that is comparatively higher, while TrendAI Vision One features a more budget-friendly setup process, highlighting the cost differences between these two cybersecurity solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR involves an initial setup cost that is comparatively higher, while TrendAI Vision One features a more budget-friendly setup process, highlighting the cost differences between these two cybersecurity solutions.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.6 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in integration within the Fortinet ecosystem, offering advanced threat intelligence and comprehensive detection. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR focuses on ease of use and reporting clarity, with a managed SOC for continuous monitoring, ideal for streamlined deployment and management.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Huntress Managed EDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has upfront setup costs, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a minimal initial fee, highlighting a notable difference in their cost structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has upfront setup costs, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a minimal initial fee, highlighting a notable difference in their cost structures.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR provides robust security, seamless FortiGate integration, and cost-effectiveness but requires improved navigation and Mac compatibility. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers intuitive management, layered security, and geofencing, though it benefits from refined reporting and education resources.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
Fortinet FortiEDR offers a flexible setup cost, catering to varying budgets, while WatchGuard Firebox presents a straightforward pricing model, making the initial investment predictable.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR offers a flexible setup cost, catering to varying budgets, while WatchGuard Firebox presents a straightforward pricing model, making the initial investment predictable.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in threat isolation and malware prevention, making it suitable for organizations seeking strong basic protection at a cost-effective price. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers comprehensive threat detection and response capabilities, justifying its higher cost with superior features and better ROI.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. HP Wolf Security Report
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
HP Wolf Security has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in support quality and comprehensive threat detection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR has a more integrated security approach and seamless Microsoft product integration. Fortinet FortiEDR mitigates threats effectively, while Microsoft Defender XDR offers competitive pricing and substantial ROI through Microsoft infrastructure integration.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Microsoft Defender XDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR requires a higher initial investment. FortiEDR is known for its affordability, contrasting with Defender XDR's premium price reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost, while Microsoft Defender XDR requires a higher initial investment. FortiEDR is known for its affordability, contrasting with Defender XDR's premium price reflecting its comprehensive features.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and centralized management, offering real-time response powered by AI. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR integrates well into existing infrastructures, simplifying deployment and reducing operational costs, appealing to businesses focused on network security efficiency.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR has a more complex pricing structure. Consideration of these differences is crucial when comparing these cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR has a more complex pricing structure. Consideration of these differences is crucial when comparing these cybersecurity solutions.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 InsightIDR offers ease of use and efficient integration, making it ideal for teams prioritizing accessibility. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR provides robust security with fewer false positives, appealing to those needing strong threat protection. Rapid7 InsightIDR ensures smooth deployment, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR delivers advanced security capabilities.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
Rapid7 InsightIDR has an affordable setup cost and robust user support, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR's setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive initial configuration services.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightIDR has an affordable setup cost and robust user support, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR's setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive initial configuration services.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is admired for automated threat detection and comprehensive threat intelligence, making it cost-effective with straightforward deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint, with advanced AI-driven features and deep learning capabilities, offers superior protection justifying its higher price despite complex setup.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is low, while Intercept X Endpoint has a higher setup cost. Fortinet offers straightforward installation, but Intercept X provides advanced customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is low, while Intercept X Endpoint has a higher setup cost. Fortinet offers straightforward installation, but Intercept X provides advanced customization options.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum's pricing appeals to those seeking cost-effective security with strong support and centralized management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR's superior features and AI-driven analysis make it a justified investment for those prioritizing advanced protection and efficiency in diverse environments.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum Report
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum's setup cost is competitive, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This highlights a clear cost difference in initial setup expenses between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum's setup cost is competitive, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This highlights a clear cost difference in initial setup expenses between the two security solutions.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet impresses with its comprehensive threat detection, easy deployment, responsive customer service, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR excels in advanced threat hunting, provides robust customer support, and is valued for long-term benefits despite a more complex setup.
Download Cynet vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Cynet has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which has higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which has higher initial expenses.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere excels in centralized logging and comprehensive network management, appealing to organizations prioritizing centralized security visibility. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR focuses on endpoint protection with robust Fortinet integration, suitable for businesses needing advanced endpoint detection and proactive threat prevention.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. LevelBlue USM Anywhere Report
USM Anywhere incurs higher setup costs, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere incurs higher setup costs, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more cost-effective setup.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in pricing and support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR stands out with its features and real-time detection. VMware impresses with a straightforward deployment process, while Fortinet's customer service is favored. VMware offers competitive costs, whereas Fortinet justifies higher pricing with added value.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a more economical initial investment.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers user-friendly deployment with strong threat protection like virtual patching and centralized management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR excels in advanced antivirus capabilities and detailed threat detection, appealing to buyers seeking robust antivirus and platform integration.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has an affordable setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more comprehensive initial cost structure. Fortinet FortiEDR focuses on offering a packaged installation with detailed configuration options.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has an affordable setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more comprehensive initial cost structure. Fortinet FortiEDR focuses on offering a packaged installation with detailed configuration options.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in pricing and support, offering strong endpoint protection and threat detection. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint provides a comprehensive security suite with advanced features. Fortinet is noted for easier deployment, while Cisco's superior integration and long-term value attract tech buyers seeking robust performance.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR offers competitive setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is noted for its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR offers competitive setup cost, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is noted for its higher initial investment.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
NetWitness NDR excels in pricing, deployment ease, threat detection, and real-time analytics. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR's strengths lie in automated responses, endpoint protection, and integration capabilities. NetWitness prioritizes cost-effectiveness and scalability, while Fortinet's robust automation and customer support offer higher ROI despite initial costs.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. NetWitness NDR Report
NetWitness NDR has a higher initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness NDR has a higher initial setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a simpler and more cost-effective setup.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides efficient threat detection and response, integrating multiple security tools into a single platform. Users appreciate its intuitive design and comprehensive analytics. Some feedback suggests enhancing the documentation quality and expanding integration capabilities to better personalize experiences.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Digital Guardian
3.4 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Digital Guardian
3.4 out of 5
Digital Guardian excels in data loss prevention and user-centric security measures. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for comprehensive endpoint protection and automated threat response. Digital Guardian offers detailed insights and control, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR provides advanced threat detection and superior integration.
Download Digital Guardian vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Digital Guardian has a higher upfront setup cost, requiring a larger initial investment from users. Fortinet FortiEDR, on the other hand, offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations with limited initial capital.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital Guardian has a higher upfront setup cost, requiring a larger initial investment from users. Fortinet FortiEDR, on the other hand, offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations with limited initial capital.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR excels in pricing, ROI, and customer service, favored for robust automation and user-friendly management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR offers advanced features and granular threat detection but has more complex deployment and setup. Bitdefender's simplicity contrasts with Fortinet's detailed threat identification.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a straightforward and affordable setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR presents a higher initial investment. Bitdefender suits budget-conscious users, whereas FortiEDR may be preferable for those seeking comprehensive features with a higher budget allowance.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has a straightforward and affordable setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR presents a higher initial investment. Bitdefender suits budget-conscious users, whereas FortiEDR may be preferable for those seeking comprehensive features with a higher budget allowance.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in advanced threat detection and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Morphisec leverages its innovative Moving Target Defense technology. Fortinet FortiEDR stands out for ease of deployment and superior customer support, while Morphisec is ideal for those prioritizing high-end security features despite higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Morphisec Report
Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its high setup costs, while Morphisec offers a more affordable setup. FortiEDR may appeal to larger enterprises with robust budgets, whereas Morphisec targets cost-conscious organizations seeking effective threat prevention without significant initial inve...
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its high setup costs, while Morphisec offers a more affordable setup. FortiEDR may appeal to larger enterprises with robust budgets, whereas Morphisec targets cost-conscious organizations seeking effective threat prevention without significant initial inve...
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in threat detection and automated response, offering extensive security features. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR is highly regarded for its seamless integration and easier management. Fortinet FortiEDR provides superior threat analysis, while WatchGuard EPDR is more user-friendly with quicker deployment.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is described as moderate and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR entails higher initial investment and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is described as moderate and straightforward, while WatchGuard EPDR entails higher initial investment and complexity.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
CompassOne by Blackpoint Cyber
4.5 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its affordable pricing and straightforward deployment process. In comparison, CompassOne by Blackpoint Cyber attracts buyers seeking advanced security capabilities, offering superior features and seamless integration with third-party tools despite a more complex deployment and higher cost.
Download CompassOne by Blackpoint Cyber vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while CompassOne by Blackpoint Cyber provides a more complex setup process that might have higher associated costs. Users note that the simplicity of Fortinet contrasts with CompassOne's detailed configuration requ...
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while CompassOne by Blackpoint Cyber provides a more complex setup process that might have higher associated costs. Users note that the simplicity of Fortinet contrasts with CompassOne's detailed configuration requ...
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Lookout
3.8 out of 5
Lookout offers superior customer support and valuable mobile threat defense capabilities. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR excels with advanced threat detection, despite higher costs. Fortinet FortiEDR users seek optimization, while Lookout users desire better analytics. Lookout's seamless platform integration contrasts with Fortinet FortiEDR's comprehensive feature set.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Lookout Report
Lookout is praised for its affordable setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its higher initial investment. Fortinet FortiEDR offers extensive features but at a greater setup expense compared to Lookout.
View comparison
Pricing
Lookout is praised for its affordable setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its higher initial investment. Fortinet FortiEDR offers extensive features but at a greater setup expense compared to Lookout.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint is known for its pricing and effective threat detection, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers advanced threat hunting and automation. In comparison, Logpoint excels in ease of deployment, whereas Fortinet FortiEDR is chosen for its rich features and perceived high value despite higher costs.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Logpoint Report
Logpoint offers a cost-effective setup suited for small to medium businesses, while Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher initial setup cost targeting larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint offers a cost-effective setup suited for small to medium businesses, while Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher initial setup cost targeting larger enterprises.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers advanced threat detection and low system impact, making it ideal for those seeking efficiency and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, ConnectWise SIEM impresses with comprehensive logging and analytics features. Fortinet FortiEDR has a streamlined interface, while ConnectWise SIEM's extensive features justify its higher cost.
Download ConnectWise SIEM vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost compared to ConnectWise SIEM, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost compared to ConnectWise SIEM, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Red Canary
4.5 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Red Canary
4.5 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR, known for robust security and seamless Fortinet integration, enables comprehensive endpoint protection. In comparison, Red Canary excels in advanced threat detection and expert-led analysis. Tech buyers might favor Fortinet for integration capabilities, while Red Canary attracts those needing superior threat intelligence and proactive support.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Red Canary Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a streamlined setup cost, while Red Canary's initial costs are higher but include extensive support.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a streamlined setup cost, while Red Canary's initial costs are higher but include extensive support.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fidelis Elevate offers advanced threat detection with a focus on network visibility and automated incident response. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR excels in endpoint protection and integration capabilities. Fidelis Elevate requires enhancement in data analytics, while Fortinet FortiEDR needs better cloud integration.
Download Fidelis Elevate vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fidelis Elevate has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR. Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fidelis Elevate has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiEDR. Fortinet FortiEDR offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5
Cybereason excels with high detection accuracy and visualizing malicious operations, ideal for agile threat response. In comparison, Fortinet's unified agent capabilities and security fabric integration offer comprehensive coverage, appealing to those seeking a holistic security approach. Each solution delivers substantial ROI through distinctive features.
Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a moderate setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a lower setup cost, making FortiEDR more cost-effective initially.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a moderate setup cost, while Fortinet FortiEDR offers a lower setup cost, making FortiEDR more cost-effective initially.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform
4.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers real-time threat detection and automated response capabilities. In comparison, SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform stands out for comprehensive asset management and vulnerability assessment. Fortinet FortiEDR focuses on integration capabilities, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform needs better reporting customizations. Fortinet has competitive pricing, whereas SanerNow provides extensive features.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a moderate setup cost with robust features, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform offers a lower initial investment but with a straightforward implementation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a moderate setup cost with robust features, while SanerNow CyberHygiene Platform offers a lower initial investment but with a straightforward implementation process.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.5 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
ESET EDR/XDR
4.5 out of 5
ESET EDR/XDR is utilized for robust threat detection and response, offering valuable features like centralized management and real-time analysis. Room for improvement includes enhancing integration capabilities and reducing complexity, ensuring more seamless deployment and efficient use of its advanced features.
Download ESET EDR/XDR vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
View comparison
Pricing
I rate the solution’s pricing a six or seven out of ten..
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Expert
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR delivers comprehensive security with efficient features like web filtering and ransomware protection, ideal for integration ease. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert offers strong detection and network monitoring, appealing to those prioritizing machine learning and reliable response over resource intensity.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Expert Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, which requires a higher initial investment. Fortinet's affordability attracts budget-conscious users, while Kaspersky offers a comprehensive suite despite its higher cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, which requires a higher initial investment. Fortinet's affordability attracts budget-conscious users, while Kaspersky offers a comprehensive suite despite its higher cost.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is preferred for its real-time threat detection and automated response, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR stands out with robust AI-driven analysis and comprehensive threat intelligence. FortiEDR offers straightforward deployment, while GravityZone XDR excels in seamless cloud-based setup.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR offers a straightforward setup process, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR presents more flexible initial cost options. Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its predictable pricing, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is praised for customization and affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR offers a straightforward setup process, while Bitdefender GravityZone XDR presents more flexible initial cost options. Fortinet FortiEDR is noted for its predictable pricing, whereas Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is praised for customization and affordability.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum
4.2 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides endpoint protection for servers, desktops, and laptops offering antivirus, malware, and patch management. Its centralized console offers real-time threat detection and SIEM integration. Users seek better UI, scalability, and firewall integration, mentioning the need for improved support and network incident troubleshooting.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum Report
I'm based in Zimbabwe, but I found the pricing for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum reasonable.
The price of the solution is reasonable. It cost approximately €10,000 annually.
View comparison
Pricing
I'm based in Zimbabwe, but I found the pricing for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum reasonable.
The price of the solution is reasonable. It cost approximately €10,000 annually.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
VMware Carbon Black Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is favored for its cost efficiency and simplicity in threat scenarios. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Cloud offers advanced capabilities and scalable architecture. FortiEDR excels at ease of deployment while Carbon Black Cloud focuses on threat hunting and detailed intelligence.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. VMware Carbon Black Cloud Report
Fortinet FortiEDR is praised for its lower setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is noted for a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR is praised for its lower setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is noted for a higher initial investment.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
Coro boosts efficiency with its security and compliance features. Its simple integration makes it a preferred option for businesses. Users appreciate its user-friendly design. However, some find that advanced customization options could enhance the experience, and timely updates are welcome for better performance.
View comparison
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers robust security with efficient threat detection, real-time response, and low false-positive rate. In comparison, Datto EDR provides integrated backup solutions and extensive threat intelligence. Fortinet FortiEDR excels in easy deployment, while Datto EDR is valued for its comprehensive functionalities despite higher cost.
Download Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is more cost-effective for initial deployment. Differences in setup costs can be significant for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is more cost-effective for initial deployment. Differences in setup costs can be significant for budget-conscious organizations.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Kaspersky Next XDR Expert
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers comprehensive integration with Fortinet products, enhancing detection and automation. In comparison, Kaspersky excels in behavior analysis and centralized protection with strong device control. Fortinet is noted for cost-effectiveness, while Kaspersky is recognized for affordability and ROI potential.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Kaspersky Next XDR Expert Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers comprehensive threat detection, user-friendliness, and cost-effective solutions. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client excels in malware prevention, reliability, and superior performance. Fortinet FortiEDR requires enhanced integrations, while SonicWall Capture Client needs better scalability and Mac support. Fortinet FortiEDR ensures straightforward deployment.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is described as moderate, whereas SonicWall Capture Client is highlighted for its lower initial setup expense. Fortinet offers comprehensive features at a higher cost, while SonicWall provides essential capabilities with budget-friendly pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is described as moderate, whereas SonicWall Capture Client is highlighted for its lower initial setup expense. Fortinet offers comprehensive features at a higher cost, while SonicWall provides essential capabilities with budget-friendly pricing.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in real-time threat detection with cost-efficient support. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud offers advanced protection features like anti-malware and data encryption. Fortinet appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while Kaspersky provides extensive security for tech buyers prioritizing comprehensive measures.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Kaspersky Next EDR Foundations Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher initial setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
ESET Inspect
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in threat detection, real-time response, and automation, offering straightforward deployment. In comparison, ESET Inspect provides comprehensive endpoint visibility, proactive threat hunting, and advanced investigative tools, thus delivering better ROI and detailed investigative features. Scalability is a challenge for ESET Inspect, while FortiEDR faces integration issues.
Download ESET Inspect vs. Fortinet FortiEDR Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has higher initial setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, which is more budget-friendly. ESET Inspect users find setup straightforward, while Fortinet FortiEDR requires advanced IT skills for initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has higher initial setup costs compared to ESET Inspect, which is more budget-friendly. ESET Inspect users find setup straightforward, while Fortinet FortiEDR requires advanced IT skills for initial configuration.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR is valued for its automation capabilities and seamless integration with other Fortinet products. In comparison, Trellix EDR stands out due to its advanced analytics and robust threat detection. Fortinet FortiEDR is easier to deploy, while Trellix EDR offers comprehensive support documentation.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is widely considered budget-friendly while Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is widely considered budget-friendly while Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its advanced features.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR excels in pricing and support, offering comprehensive threat detection and automated response. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response, appreciated for advanced features like superior threat intelligence and machine learning, justifies its higher cost for users seeking robust and effective security solutions.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response Report
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Fortinet FortiEDR emphasizes premium security, whereas WithSecure focuses on affordability without compromising efficacy.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR has a higher setup cost, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Detection and Response offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Fortinet FortiEDR emphasizes premium security, whereas WithSecure focuses on affordability without compromising efficacy.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Sangfor Endpoint Secure
4.1 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR offers robust real-time protection and automated response, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure excels in threat intelligence and detection mechanisms. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR integrates better with third-party tools, whereas Sangfor Endpoint Secure is more cost-effective with a lower initial setup cost.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. Sangfor Endpoint Secure Report
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is relatively high, requiring significant investment, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it a more affordable option for organizations with limited resources.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiEDR setup cost is relatively high, requiring significant investment, while Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it a more affordable option for organizations with limited resources.
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiEDR Logo
Open EDR
4.0 out of 5
Open EDR effectively addresses cybersecurity use cases with robust threat detection and monitoring. Users appreciate its real-time alerts and adaptability. Some reviews suggest that integration capabilities need enhancement. Users highlight its capability for continuous improvement and its user-friendly approach to help tech teams manage security efficiently.
View comparison

Related categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)