Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response integrates antivirus, threat response, and EDR with high detection rates, behavior detection, and device control. It supports centralized management for seamless operation across remote and on-premise servers.



| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Extended Detection and Response (XDR) | Apr 9, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Apr 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs CrowdStrike Falcon | Apr 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint | Apr 9, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Kaspersky Next XDR Expert vs TrendAI Vision One | Apr 9, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint | 4.4 | 5.8% | 98% | 227 interviewsAdd to research |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 4.3 | 9.4% | 97% | 138 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 91 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 63 |
| Large Enterprise | 112 |
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers a robust platform featuring automated responses, advanced reporting, and customizable policies. Users appreciate its lightweight agent and compatibility, though many report issues with stability and resource intensity. While effective in malware detection and incident response, challenges remain in configuration, integration, and efficient patch management. Zero-day detection and cloud version stability have room for improvement. However, its capabilities make it highly recommended in regions like Pakistan.
What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?In industries prioritizing security, such as finance and healthcare, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids in threat hunting and behavior analysis. It integrates with SIEM systems, allowing precise encryption, targeted attack protection, and device management. Deployed on servers, workstations, and mobile devices, it's particularly esteemed in areas like Pakistan for its robust capabilities.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| IT Manager at R K Khanna and Associates | 4.0 | I use Kaspersky EDR mainly as a firewall, and while it’s affordable and stable, it’s less effective and more resource-heavy than CrowdStrike, which I preferred but stopped using due to its high cost. |
| Manager Cyber Security Department at Mana | 3.0 | I've used Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for two years in threat hunting, finding its detection adequate but lacking features, scalability, and support compared to industry leaders like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro, making it unsuitable for long-term use. |
| Security Engineer at adcb | 4.0 | We prioritize Kaspersky for its effective detection and response features, particularly its sandbox environment for malware analysis. However, support needs improvement due to slow response times. We switched from CrowdStrike due to data privacy concerns and cost efficiency. |
| IT Manager at Ducart | 4.0 | I find Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response easy to use with good protection that doesn't impact computer performance. However, there's room for enhancing security and performance. I previously didn't consider other solutions and have no preferred cloud provider. |
| IT Administrator at TGTC | 4.0 | I found Kaspersky EDR highly effective and customizable on-premises, but transitioning to the cloud caused severe compatibility issues, leading to high CPU usage and unresponsive systems. Despite its previous success, we switched to SentinelOne due to these cloud problems. |
| Head of Information Security at Faisal Islamic Bank of Egypt | 4.0 | I primarily use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for endpoints due to its high detection rate and valuable features like behavior detection and threat prevention. It could improve integration capabilities. Transitioning from Symantec was seamless, saving us about 70% in costs. |
| Network administrator at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | I use Kaspersky on numerous servers and workstations, finding its IT management features valuable, though it lacks XDR capabilities. Our security improved significantly after transitioning from McAfee, though Cortex offers better security features. |
| Senior Information Security Analyst at EastNets Holding Ltd. | 5.0 | In my company, we use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for environment scanning and SIEM integration. Its centralization feature is invaluable, though the UI needs improvement. Previously, I used Malwarebytes and GravityZone for smaller setups, but Kaspersky suits larger environments. |