


IBM Security QRadar and Fortinet FortiEDR are leading solutions in the cybersecurity segment, competing in the security information and event management (SIEM) and endpoint detection and response (EDR) sectors, respectively. QRadar holds an edge with its integration capabilities and data enrichment features, while FortiEDR is noted for its next-generation firewall capabilities and robust threat detection.
Features: QRadar stands out with powerful data enrichment, user behavior analytics, and predefined connectors, offering seamless integration and robust event filtration. Users can easily create use cases and integrate various devices, making it highly regarded for predefined correlation rules. FortiEDR excels with its threat detection and next-generation firewall features, providing comprehensive security and monitoring options.
Room for Improvement: QRadar users see opportunities in enhancing custom actions, improving playbook design, and reducing false positives. There is also a demand for better integration, user interface, and reporting capabilities. FortiEDR could strengthen its cloud security features, improve third-party integration, and refine reporting capabilities. Stability issues, such as application crashes when enabled, are also noted by users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QRadar offers on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment, appreciated for flexibility but requiring skilled personnel for setup. FortiEDR, suited for public cloud environments, is simpler to deploy for those seeking cloud solutions. Both provide reliable technical support, but FortiEDR is recognized for having faster responsiveness in customer service.
Pricing and ROI: QRadar is cost-effective for large enterprises over long-term commitments, despite its high initial cost. It offers flexible licensing and promises long-term savings. FortiEDR's pricing, while competitive, may be high for smaller companies, but the cost aligns well with its robust security features. Both solutions deliver discernible ROI through enhanced security capabilities and reduced resource usage.
With Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks' incident correlation, behavioral detection, and process tree visibility, similar initial triage can often be completed in roughly 10 to 20 minutes, depending on the incident.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
With SOAR, the workflow takes one minute or less to complete the analysis.
AWS gives the chance to implement a solution out of the box with use cases that are already in IBM Security QRadar.
Investing this amount was very much worth it for my organization.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
The technical support from Fortinet is excellent.
For setting up some proper solutions for issues at the customer site, it can take about one week.
I believe the support from Fortinet is very good based on my experiences asking for help.
They assist with advanced issues, such as hardware or other problems, that are not part of standard operations.
Support needs to understand the issue first, then escalate it to the engineering team.
The support is really good; for instance, if a critical ticket is submitted, you will get paged right away as it gets logged, and their analyst will look into it, letting you know as soon as possible so you can work on it.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
When implemented in a Fortinet environment with an existing firewall, FortiAnalyzer, and FortiManager, it is straightforward to install and scale by adding more EDR for endpoints.
I can give it nine points in terms of scalability.
For EPS license, if you increase or exceed the EPS license, you cannot receive events.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
After that, I stopped scanning the Cisco AnyConnect and switched to Fortinet VPN. Everything worked fine afterward.
For stability, I would give it a score of ten, as we are not having any issues with that currently.
On cloud, you don't see any disconnections or instability.
I think QRadar is stable and currently satisfies my needs.
The product has been stable so far.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
When a Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks incident is confirmed, it would be useful to automatically create a ServiceNow or Jira ticket with the incident summary, including affected endpoints, user indicators, process tree, severity, and recommended response actions.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
Fortinet could consider reducing the minimum order quantity for EDR, currently set at 500 pieces.
We receive logs from different types of devices and need a way to correlate them effectively.
If AI-related support can suggest rules and integrate with existing security devices like MD, IPS, this SIM can create more relevant rules.
IBM Security QRadar does not support Canvas, so we had to create custom scripts and workarounds to pull logs from Canvas.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
It's reasonably priced compared to other vendors' similar products.
The pricing is moderate; I cannot label it as cheap, but it is moderate compared to other main solutions.
Splunk is more expensive than IBM Security QRadar.
It was costly mainly because of the value you can get right now compared to other solutions.
It depends on how much you want to spend.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The four pillars of the solution are security access via VPN, ZTNA, attack surface protection, and automatic incident response, integrating with Fortinet Security Fabric.
This is especially relevant for government projects where the SD-WAN solution is within their private network, not touching the Internet or any other access.
Recently, I faced an incident, a cyber incident, and it was detected in real time.
IBM Security QRadar gives the opportunity to improve the time to market of the releases with a great evaluation of cybersecurity breaches.
Compared to ArcSight, Splunk, or any other SIEM tools where you need their processing language such as structured query language, SPL, and in Sentinel there is KQL query languages, IBM Security QRadar doesn't require reliance on query languages.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.8% |
| IBM Security QRadar | 2.1% |
| Fortinet FortiEDR | 2.2% |
| Other | 91.9% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 57 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 93 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 39 |
| Large Enterprise | 107 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Fortinet FortiEDR integrates with FortiGate, offering advanced antivirus and AI-driven behavioral analysis, automatic incident response, and strong scalability in endpoint security. It's especially noted for ease of deployment and a user-friendly interface.
Fortinet FortiEDR provides robust security features such as firewall and ransomware prevention. Its centralized management console simplifies operations, and customizable settings enhance user experience. It excels in granular threat control and effective threat intelligence for endpoint security and zero-day threat mitigation. The system is valued for its stability and comprehensive data analysis. However, increased cloud security, SASE capabilities, and better intelligence features are needed. Some users find challenges with high resource consumption, user interface, and false positives, while seeking improved cloud functions, SIEM integration, and broader attack surface protection.
What are the key features of Fortinet FortiEDR?Organizations utilize Fortinet FortiEDR for endpoint security across banking, education, and elder care sectors, integrating it with Fortinet firewalls. It detects and blocks unauthorized software and controls lateral movement, aiding in anomaly detection and threat hunting. It ensures network visibility and assists in incident response within diverse infrastructures.
IBM Security QRadar offers real-time threat detection, data correlation, and integration with third-party solutions, providing a user-friendly interface, scalability, and extensive reporting capabilities for SIEM needs.
IBM Security QRadar is designed for comprehensive security monitoring in diverse environments, aiding sectors like telecom and finance with advanced threat detection and breach management. It aggregates data and analyzes user behavior, while its customizable and out-of-the-box rules deliver robust security insights and vulnerability management. The platform seeks enhancements in integration, performance, and user interface, with a focus on AI and cloud service compatibility.
What are the most important features of IBM Security QRadar?Telecom, finance, and cloud-based industries implement IBM Security QRadar for threat detection, compliance, and security monitoring. It is deployed for log collection and correlation, user behavior analytics, and ensuring secure data transfer and incident management, focusing on compliance and anomaly detection.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.