StreamSets vs Upsolver comparison

IBM and Upsolver are both solutions in the Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.5, while Upsolver is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.5. IBM holds a 1.1% mindshare in DI, compared to Upsolver’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Upsolver users who would recommend it.

StreamSets

Read 21 StreamSets reviews

4,142 Views
3,189 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Upsolver

Read 4 Upsolver reviews

2,013 Views
1,610 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

StreamSets

Upsolver

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between StreamSets and Upsolver based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed StreamSets vs. Upsolver Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

StreamSets vs. Upsolver

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

StreamSets

Ranking in Data Integration

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Upsolver

Ranking in Data Integration

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of StreamSets is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Upsolver is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
StreamSets	1.1%
Upsolver	0.7%
Other	98.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

SrinivasanSankar

Enterprise Solutions Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Enables effective batch loading with visual interface and enterprise support

One issue I observed with StreamSets is that the memory runs out quickly when processing large volumes of data. Because of this memory issue, we have to upgrade our EC2 boxes in the Amazon AWS infrastructure. I had to switch to a new EC2 box, even though the processor was not fully utilized. It would be beneficial if StreamSets addressed any potential memory leak issues to prevent unnecessary upgrades. Additionally, it would be a great enhancement if StreamSets could produce a lineage graph to visualize how the data has passed through the system.

Read full review

reviewer2784462

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Streaming pipelines have become simpler and onboarding new data sources is now much faster

One of the best features Upsolver offers is the automatic schema evolution. Another good feature is SQL-based streaming transformations. Complex streaming transformations such as cleansing, deduplication, and enrichment were implemented using SQL and drastically reduced the need for custom Spark code. My experience with the SQL-based streaming transformations in Upsolver is that it had a significant positive impact on the overall data engineering workflow. By replacing custom Spark streaming jobs with declarative SQL logic, I simplified development, review, and deployment processes. Data transformations such as parsing, filtering, enrichment, and deduplication could be implemented and modified quickly without rebuilding or redeploying complex code-based pipelines. Upsolver has impacted my organization positively because it brings many benefits. The first one is faster onboarding of new data sources. Another one is more reliable streaming pipelines. Another one is near-real-time data availability, which is very important for us. It also reduced operational effort for data engineering teams. A specific outcome that highlights these benefits is that the time to onboard new sources is reduced from weeks to days. Custom Spark code reduction reached 50 to 40 percent. Pipeline failures are reduced by 70 to 80 percent. Data latency is improved from hours to minutes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the pipelines because they enable us to pull in and push out data from different sources and to manipulate and clean things up within them."

"The ETL capabilities are very useful for us. We extract and transform data from multiple data sources, into a single, consistent data store, and then we put it in our systems. We typically use it to connect our Apache Kafka with data lakes. That process is smooth and saves us a lot of time in our production systems."

"The best thing about StreamSets is its plugins, which are very useful and work well with almost every data source. It's also easy to use, especially if you're comfortable with SQL. You can customize it to do what you need. Many other tools have started to use features similar to those introduced by StreamSets, like automated workflows that are easy to set up."

"StreamSets’ data drift resilience has reduced the time it takes us to fix data drift breakages. For example, in our previous Hadoop scenario, when we were creating the Sqoop-based processes to move data from source to destinations, we were getting the job done. That took approximately an hour to an hour and a half when we did it with Hadoop. However, with the StreamSets, since it works on a data collector-based mechanism, it completes the same process in 15 minutes of time. Therefore, it has saved us around 45 minutes per data pipeline or table that we migrate. Thus, it reduced the data transfer, including the drift part, by 45 minutes."

"StreamSets is the leader in the market."

"For me, the most valuable features in StreamSets have to be the Data Collector and Control Hub, but especially the Data Collector. That feature is very elegant and seamlessly works with numerous source systems."

"What I love the most is that StreamSets is very light. It's a containerized application. It's easy to use with Docker. If you are a large organization, it's very easy to use Kubernetes."

"StreamSets has definitely helped us in getting the information into our data lake very quickly, in terms of ingestion, and the most important thing is it has helped us from a resourcing point of view because you can easily upskill a BI or ETL resource without any programming knowledge to work with this, which has drastically reduced the time that we are spending on workloads by 60% to 70% as well as reducing the time spent on ingestion by 30%."

More StreamSets pros

"I have saved 50 to 60% on maintaining pipelines since using Upsolver."

"Customer service is excellent, and I would rate it between eight point five to nine out of ten."

"It was easy to use and set up, with a nearly no-code interface that relied mostly on drag-and-drop functionality."

"A specific outcome that highlights these benefits is that the time to onboard new sources is reduced from weeks to days, custom Spark code reduction reached 50 to 40 percent, pipeline failures are reduced by 70 to 80 percent, and data latency is improved from hours to minutes."

"The most prominent feature of Upsolver is its function as an ETL tool, allowing data to be moved across platforms and different data technologies."

Cons

"I would like to see it integrate with other kinds of platforms, other than Java. We're going to have a lot of applications using .NET and other languages or frameworks. StreamSets is very helpful for the old Java platform but it's hard to integrate with the other platforms and frameworks."

"One area for improvement could be the cloud storage server speed, as we have faced some latency issues here and there."

"Sometimes, it is not clear at first how to set up nodes. A site with an explanation of how each node works would be very helpful."

"The design experience is the bane of our existence because their documentation is not the best. Even when they update their software, they don't publish the best information on how to update and change your pipeline configuration to make it conform to current best practices. We don't pay for the added support. We use the "freeware version." The user community, as well as the documentation they provide for the standard user, are difficult, at best."

"We often faced problems, especially with SAP ERP. We struggled because many columns weren't integers or primary keys, which StreamSets couldn't handle. We had to restructure our data tables, which was painful. Also, pipeline failures were common, and data drifting wasn't addressed, which made things worse. Licensing was another issue we encountered."

"They need to improve their customer care services. Sometimes it has taken more than 48 hours to resolve an issue. That should be reduced. They are aware of small or generic issues, but not the more technical or deep issues. For those, they require some time, generally 48 to 72 hours to respond. That should be improved."

"The documentation is inadequate and has room for improvement because the technical support does not regularly update their documentation or the knowledge base."

"In terms of the product, I don't think there is any room for improvement because it is very good. One small area of improvement that is very much needed is on the knowledge base side. Sometimes, it is not very clear how to set up a certain process or a certain node for a person who's using the platform for the first time."

More StreamSets cons

"There is room for improvement in query tuning."

"On the stability side, I would rate it seven out of ten. Using multiple cloud providers and data engineering technologies creates complexity, and managing different plugins is not always easy, but they are working on it."

"I think that Upsolver can be improved in orchestration because it is not a full orchestration tool."

"I would say Upsolver's scalability is eight out of 10 because of pricing."

"Upsolver excels in ETL and data aggregation, while ThoughtSpot is strong in natural language processing for querying datasets. Combining these tools can be very effective: Upsolver handles aggregation and ETL, and ThoughtSpot allows for natural language queries. There’s potential for highlighting these integrations in the future."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version. It's great for a public, free release. Our stance is that the paid support model is too expensive to get into. They should honestly reevaluate that."

"It's not so favorable for small companies."

"We are running the community version right now, which can be used free of charge."

"The overall cost is very flexible so it is not a burden for our organization... However, the cost should be improved. For small and mid-size organizations it might be a challenge."

"It has a CPU core-based licensing, which works for us and is quite good."

"The pricing is affordable for any business."

"The pricing is too fixed. It should be based on how much data you need to process. Some businesses are not so big that they process a lot of data."

"Its pricing is pretty much up to the mark. For smaller enterprises, it could be a big price to pay at the initial stage of operations, but the moment you have the Seed B or Seed C funding and you want to scale up your operations and aren't much worried about the funds, at that point in time, you would need a solution that could be scaled."

More StreamSets pricing and cost advice

"Upsolver is affordable at approximately $225 per terabyte per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Retailer

12%

Construction Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with StreamSets?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StreamSets?

We are using StreamSets for batch loading.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering StreamSets?

If asked, I definitely recommend StreamSets to other users. My overall rating for the solution is nine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Upsolver?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is nine out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Upsolver?

I think Upsolver can be improved with deeper integration with external orchestration out of the box. I would appreciate more clear dashboards with billing in real time as a needed improvement.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Upsolver?

My main use case for Upsolver is to operate with changes in the structure of new data without a pipeline disrupting. I write SQL queries in Upsolver, and the platform takes care of the data itself,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs StreamSets

Compared 9% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs StreamSets

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

Confluent vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs StreamSets

Compared 5% of the time

More StreamSets Competitors

Databricks vs Upsolver

Compared 11% of the time

Striim vs Upsolver

Compared 11% of the time

Rivery vs Upsolver

Compared 7% of the time

SAS Access vs Upsolver

Compared 7% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs Upsolver

Compared 7% of the time

More Upsolver Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

StreamSets

July 2026

Download StreamSets product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

August 2026

Download Upsolver product report

Overview

StreamSets streamlines data pipeline creation, connecting data from multiple sources to destinations like cloud platforms with minimal coding. Its centralized platform and intuitive design enhance ETL and data migration processes.

StreamSets integrates seamlessly with analytics platforms, offering tools such as Data Collector and Control Hub to facilitate data ingestion, transformation, and machine learning integrations. Its user-friendly interface and ready connectors aid in configuring complex data pipelines. With built-in data drift resilience and scheduling options, users experience efficient, scalable data management, despite challenges like latency in cloud storage and interface enhancement needs. Users often employ StreamSets for batch loading, real-time data processing, and smart data pipeline management, offering comprehensive data integration solutions.

What are the key features of StreamSets?

Data Collector: Enables streamlined data collection and processing.
Control Hub: Centralizes management of data pipelines.
Minimal Coding: Simplifies pipeline configuration with limited code requirement.
Data Drift Resilience: Adapts to changes in data patterns effectively.

What benefits should users look for?

Time-Saving: Efficient processes reduce manual effort.
Scalability: Easily manages large datasets.
Integration: Connects with leading analytics and cloud platforms.
Real-Time Processing: Supports continuous data delivery for timely insights.

In industries like finance and technology, StreamSets supports data migration, machine learning integrations, and analytics by simplifying data transformation and enhancing decision-making capabilities through its robust pipeline management.

IBM

Upsolver offers a data lakehouse platform that simplifies big data processing and analytics, enabling data teams to efficiently handle large-scale datasets.

Upsolver's platform focuses on simplifying the complexities of data engineering by transforming raw data into queryable formats quickly. It allows seamless integration with cloud storage and various database systems, providing flexibility for data-driven businesses. The platform automates data preparation tasks, reducing manual coding and allowing teams to focus on extracting insights. Its scalable architecture supports real-time analytics and batch processing.

What are the key features of Upsolver?

Data Ingestion: Easily ingest data from multiple sources with minimal configuration.
Schema On-Read: Automatically interpret data schemas, simplifying data management.
Streaming SQL: Transform and analyze streaming data using a familiar SQL syntax.
Data Lake Integration: Seamlessly connect with data lakes for streamlined workflows.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Time Savings: Faster data processing reduces time to insights.
Cost Efficiency: Scalable architecture optimizes infrastructure costs.
Scalability: Handle growing data volumes effortlessly.
Flexibility: Supports wide data storage and processing strategies.

In the e-commerce industry, Upsolver helps businesses optimize their data pipelines for better customer segmentation and personalization, while in finance, it enhances fraud detection capabilities through real-time data analytics.

Upsolver

Sample Customers

Availity, BT Group, Humana, Deluxe, GSK, RingCentral, IBM, Shell, SamTrans, State of Ohio, TalentFulfilled, TechBridge

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

StreamSets vs. Upsolver

August 2026

Free Report: StreamSets vs. Upsolver

Find out what your peers are saying about StreamSets vs. Upsolver and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our StreamSets vs. Upsolver report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.