Splunk Observability Cloud vs Statseeker comparison

Splunk and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Splunk is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.7, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. Splunk holds a 0.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 57 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

5,348 Views
1,390 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

538 Views
479 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Statseeker compete in the network monitoring and observability space. Splunk Observability Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced data analysis and visualization capabilities, while Statseeker is known for its cost-effectiveness and minimal setup time.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced analytics, real-time data visualization, and machine learning capabilities. It supports extensive integrations and provides robust scalability options. Statseeker emphasizes quick, efficient network monitoring with a lightweight footprint, speed, and simplicity. Key features include fast graphing functionalities and detailed historical data analysis.

Room for Improvement: Splunk Observability Cloud could enhance its user interface to be more intuitive for new users, and streamline the complexity of setup processes. More cost-effective pricing models would increase accessibility. Statseeker might improve by expanding its integration options, providing deeper analytics capabilities, and enhancing support for cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud supports flexible deployment options, including cloud-based and hybrid setups, with comprehensive support services for complex integrations. Statseeker is praised for its straightforward installation, requiring minimal configuration and resources. Its deployment is known for simplicity and speed, complemented by satisfactory customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud tends to have higher upfront costs, justified by its extensive functionalities and potential for high ROI via advanced features. Statseeker presents a more budget-friendly solution, aiming for quick returns through efficient, cost-effective monitoring capabilities. The primary trade-off involves Splunk's higher investment for comprehensive insights versus Statseeker’s economical focus on essential functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Lakshmi Padaga

Java Developer at U.S. Bank

Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection

Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Splunk APM has helped us to standardize logging and monitoring procedures."

"I find the monitoring console very helpful. With one click, I can see how we are performing, and at the same time, I can see what data is flowing."

"Great monitoring of network devices."

"The most valuable feature is log reporting."

"The best features in Splunk Observability Cloud are the metrics; I can see any logs or anything related to the server or services we want to monitor, and the metrics are a good function."

"It supports proactive management, enhances security, and improves operational efficiency."

"Splunk APM provides a holistic view of the application. Unlike other APMs, Splunk's service map is quite effective."

"It is a great resource for us because we have so many different data sources and to be able to aggregate that and put it through a concise dashboard or an alert really helps."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."

"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."

"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."

"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"It would be useful if they provided some help pages. If you don't know too much about the tool, there should be more documentation readily available. It would be useful if they had a help button embedded in the solution so you could ask questions and get answers."

"The clustering part of indexes can be more refined."

"We have both on-prem and cloud, and the challenge is getting all our log data aggregated or streams aggregated so that it is real-time. We do a pretty good job of that, but our organization is not using it as a security platform when it can do a great job of that."

"Splunk's functionality could be improved by adding database connectors for other platforms like AWS and Azure."

"Splunk APM should include a better correlation between resources and infrastructure monitoring."

"A wide variety of logging makes log onboarding difficult."

"This solution is difficult to configure and the instructions are complex."

"The dashboards are used mainly to visualize information about the infrastructure, but it isn't easy to construct or use the dashboards. While we tried to resolve the issue by calling support, it would be easier if they had an AI co-pilot to identify the problem and help you solve it."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."

"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."

"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."

"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."

"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."

"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"Splunk APM is a very cost-efficient solution."

"The price of Splunk APM is less than some of its competitors."

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 28% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 24% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

July 2025

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

July 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Statseeker

July 2025

Free Report: Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.