

Teradata and Sigma compete in the data management and analytics category. Teradata has the upper hand with its advanced analytics and scalability for large enterprise needs, while Sigma excels in user-friendly design and real-time data handling.
Features: Teradata offers parallel processing, query optimization, and robust analytics capabilities. Its adaptability and efficient management of large data volumes are notable, making it ideal for complex data environments. Sigma shines with its ease of creating pivot tables, real-time data processing, and seamless integration capabilities, especially for interactive dashboards and reports.
Room for Improvement: Teradata users seek better adaptation to cloud environments, reduced costs, and enhanced performance scaling. There is also a demand for improved unstructured data handling and cloud integration. Sigma needs enhanced visualization options, faster performance, and a more intuitive interface. Its high cost for creator licenses is a barrier to wider reporting capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Teradata provides diverse deployment options, including on-premises and hybrid cloud, though on-premises setups can be complex. Its professional customer service is well-regarded, with suggestions for improved response times. Sigma, mainly cloud-based, offers easier deployment and high customer satisfaction, contrasting with Teradata's depth of documentation and resources. Both have strong technical support, but Sigma's simplicity marks a difference.
Pricing and ROI: Teradata is powerful but costly, suitable for larger enterprises due to its performance benefits and operational efficiencies. Sigma's high pricing for creator licenses limits access but delivers ROI through enhanced reporting efficiency. Teradata's expenses are justified by its capabilities in extensive setups, whereas Sigma provides a cost-effective solution for easy data visualization and reporting needs.
It's essential for everything data-related within our company.
I have seen a return on investment with Sigma; we already said that it saves about a quarter, it gets me to answers about 25% faster.
I have definitely seen a return on investment through time saving because once the dashboards are built, they are built.
At least fifteen to twenty percent of our time has been saved using Teradata, which has positively affected team productivity and business outcomes.
Independent research showed that Teradata VantageCloud users achieved an average ROI of 427% across three years with payback under a year, demonstrating the platform's ability to deliver a strong financial return.
We have realized a return on investment, with a reduction of staff from 27 to eight, and our current return on investment is approximately 14%.
As Sigma is a cloud platform, you do not need to do all that maintenance work.
The customer support for Teradata has been great.
They are responsive and knowledgeable, and the documentation is very helpful.
Customer support is very good, rated eight out of ten under our essential agreement.
Permissions are easily set, so you only get to see what you need to see and you can share what needs to be shared.
Whenever we need more resources, we can add that in Teradata, and when not needed, we can scale it down as well.
This flexibility allows organizations to scale according to their needs, balancing performance, cost, and compliance requirements.
This expansion can occur without incurring downtime or taking systems offline.
We did not face typical errors during our project with Sigma.
Its massively parallel process architecture allows the platform to distribute workload efficiently, enabling organizations to run heavy analytic queries without compromising speed or stability.
I find the stability to be almost a ten out of ten.
The workload management and software maturity provide a reliable system.
The main improvement needed is in data modeling capabilities.
Sigma lacks a versioning feature to track changes.
It would be great if there was a way for me to create reports without relying on a data analyst.
I want to highlight two features for improvement: first, storing data in various formats without requiring a tabular structure, accommodating unstructured data; and second, adding AI ML features to better integrate Gen AI, LLM concepts, and user-friendly experiences such as text-to-SQL capabilities.
Unlike SQL and Oracle, which have in-built replication capabilities, we don't have similar functionality with Teradata.
The most challenging aspect is finding Teradata resources, so we are focusing on internal training and looking for more Teradata experts.
The pricing of Sigma is a concern, as it restricts our ability to provide more users with report-creating capabilities due to the high cost of admin or report creator licenses.
Teradata is much more expensive than SQL, which is well-performed and cheaper.
Initially, it may seem expensive compared to similar cloud databases, however, it offers significant value in performance, stability, and overall output once in use.
Role-based access control (RBAC), strong audit and compliance features, high availability, fault tolerance, and encrypted data at rest and in-transit are key features.
The use of Sigma in decision-making, presentations to customers, and reporting to investors showcases its value in handling data-related tasks.
Sigma has positively affected my organization by saving us time in accessing information, which ultimately gets us to complete projects faster.
Sigma has positively impacted my organization because I think it has been a huge impact, and we use it for all our reporting and our dashboards for tracking.
Teradata's security helps our organization meet compliance requirements such as GDPR and IFRS, and it is particularly essential for revenue contracting or revenue recognition.
Its architecture allows information to be processed efficiently while maintaining stable performance, even in highly demanding environments.
It facilitates data integration, where we integrate and analyze data from various sources, making it a powerful and high-quality reliable solution for the company.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Teradata | 0.9% |
| Sigma | 1.6% |
| Other | 97.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 28 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 52 |
Sigma is the next-generation of analytics for cloud data warehouses with a familiar spreadsheet-like interface that gives business experts the power to ask any question of their data no matter the query.
Teradata is a powerful tool for handling substantial data volumes with its parallel processing architecture, supporting both cloud and on-premise environments efficiently. It offers impressive capabilities for fast query processing, data integration, and real-time reporting, making it suitable for diverse industrial applications.
Known for its robust parallel processing capabilities, Teradata effectively manages large datasets and provides adaptable deployment across cloud and on-premise setups. It enhances performance and scalability with features like advanced query tuning, workload management, and strong security. Users appreciate its ease of use and automation features which support real-time data reporting. The optimizer and intelligent partitioning help improve query speed and efficiency, while multi-temperature data management optimizes data handling.
What are the key features of Teradata?
What benefits and ROI do users look for?
In the finance, retail, and government sectors, Teradata is employed for data warehousing, business intelligence, and analytical processing. It handles vast datasets for activities like customer behavior modeling and enterprise data integration. Supporting efficient reporting and analytics, Teradata enhances data storage and processing, whether deployed on-premise or on cloud platforms.
We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.