Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools.
The marketplace community and forums are what we browse and look after, and we have found solutions whenever we tried to find anything.
I have not had the need to escalate questions to Selenium HQ tech support recently, as open community support is widely available and has been sufficient for our needs.
I can rate it around eight because I think they are much faster than OpenText or Micro Focus.
We can execute thousands of test cases weekly, and our automation coverage using Selenium HQ is approximately eighty-five percent.
For scalability, I can rate Tricentis NeoLoad around three.
Selenium HQ is a scalable solution; it has been in production for the last two years, but I have been working on it for the last six years, so it is definitely scalable.
An automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the need for manual downloads and updates of browser drivers when new versions are released.
I don't know if we have that capability to provide different data sources such as SQL Server, CSV, or maybe some other databases, so that kind of capability would be great.
I would probably like to see some new functionalities for Tricentis NeoLoad, such as a converting mechanism.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
The cost increases, especially when I want to generate a load for a global customer with different loads in different regions.
Selenium HQ supports multiple browsers via grid hosting and offers dynamic configuration setup for testing across Chrome, Edge, and Internet Explorer.
When we were doing these tests manually, it took several hours of effort, and those hours, when counted on the basis of person days, used to be maybe six or seven months of effort, which we can now do every day by running the pipeline.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
I find that my team is using the features at Tricentis NeoLoad most effectively, as my role is to get that data out of the tool, and they do the analysis.
Tricentis NeoLoad excels at generating different kinds of loads.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Selenium HQ | 4.3% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 9.7% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.8% |
| Other | 78.2% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 12.5% |
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 15.3% |
| Apache JMeter | 9.3% |
| Other | 62.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 52 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 51 |
Selenium HQ, an open-source testing framework, is recognized for its ability to automate web testing across diverse environments. Its versatility in script customization and cross-browser support makes it a trusted tool for efficient automation testing.
Selenium HQ offers significant support for multiple browsers and programming languages, providing integration with CI tools and compatibility with frameworks like TestNG and JUnit. Users leverage its open-source nature for cost-effective testing and appreciate its scalability and flexibility for parallel execution. A vibrant community contributes to its continuous development. However, improvements are desired in performance-testing, parallel execution efficiency, and enhanced mobile device support. Users find it complex for those without development skills, with needs for better iOS automation and expanded reporting features.
What are the key features of Selenium HQ?Selenium HQ is widely adopted across industries for its comprehensive automation capabilities. Enterprises often employ it for UI and regression testing in web and mobile applications, integrating seamlessly with CI tools for a streamlined workflow. Its ability to automate API calls further enhances its utility across industry sectors.
Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.
Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.
What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
