We performed a comparison between SAP S/4HANA and SYSPRO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."The most valuable feature is the detail in all of the processes. The solution captures our policies and enables us to implement our policies in SAP. There are different models that address our needs."
"I like the user experience and usability of SAP Fiori, which is one of the main features that we are using."
"We have access to all types of reports in a single solution."
"The scalability has been good."
"S/4HANA falls under a single terminal. We can easily access the data, and the performance is good."
"The finance solution and procurement functionalities are good."
"S4HANA is very scalable - we use it across seven or eight factories, and everything is running fine."
"At present, it seems very stable because it is in the cloud."
"The Financial Accounting module, in general, is quite good. It is quite simple but powerful. Similarly, the Manufacturing functionality, including a multiple level bill of materials, is also quite useful."
"The cost of the solution is quite high. It needs to be adjusted."
"While the solution contemplates a competitively priced model, its pricing could be cheaper."
"The solution could improve by making customization easier. The on-premise version is a lot more flexible."
"It is simple to implement SAP S4HANA. If you are already in this type of environment, then the transition is not very complex. However, if you do not then it can be difficult."
"Every year, when a new version is released, it comes with a very thick booklet of 300 or 400 pages and it is a little difficult to comprehend."
"There are some problems with the support provided for the solution, so it is not quite easy. It takes some time for them to offer us support."
"I'm not a big fan of SAP S/4HANA because it needs a lot of hardware. It is really fast, but it needs a lot of hardware. The hardware for S/4HANA is too expensive."
"We are always looking for a better user experience. We would like to see more consolidation in SAP S4HANA because of all the financial compliance and regulatory changes."
"SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor. Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem. Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution."
Earn 20 points
SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 22 reviews while SYSPRO is ranked 28th in ERP. SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2, while SYSPRO is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". On the other hand, SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, NetSuite ERP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas SYSPRO is most compared with SAP ERP, Epicor ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and NetSuite ERP.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.