SAP ERP vs Sage MAS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Sage Logo
468 views|429 comparisons
SAP Logo
21,994 views|19,694 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Sage MAS and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP.
To learn more, read our detailed ERP Report (Updated: March 2024).
763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product provides consistent updates and upgrades.""The technical support is very good."

More Sage MAS Pros →

"The solution can easily be standardized across processes.""SAP is already working on improvements by doing annual releases with enhancements.""The system can be integrated with other SAP functionalities - such as finance, production, sales, marketing, HR, et cetera, and can also be customized to become a model that's specifically designed for my business. That's the solution's most valuable aspect.""ERP can help manage all enterprise resources. It brings them together and provides some analytical data to inform management decisions.""The most valuable feature of SAP ERP is the financial module, pre-configured packages, and plenty of features. The solution is updating and adding new features that are helpful.""The product connects to every software.""Finance view across functions is valuable.""Good customization features."

More SAP ERP Pros →

Cons
"The vendor stopped supporting the solution on the Linux platform.""We're definitely looking at a new system because everything in this product needs improving."

More Sage MAS Cons →

"The reporting could be improved, such as the casework, production, and activity reports. Our consultants in a subsidiary enterprise have requested that we develop a new production report. They could also improve production, financial, and HR analysis.""The solution is not ready for the current e-commerce environment.""There are a lot of manual tasks that are used by a lot of people, so it is a very good candidate for RPA.""It would also help if it were more open, more flexible, with more standard products.""The integration with others application could be easier. There are many different features that this solution offers which could be easier to implement.""Although you can use SAP as a Warehouse Management System, and you don’t need any other program for that purpose, it is not enough as a Transportation Management System. You need another program which is integrated with SAP.""SAP ERP needs to be more innovative when it comes to areas like mobility and the internet.""It could be more flexible, and the company should be able to adapt the system. Not the other way around. It's very rigid and difficult to change. Reporting could also be better."

More SAP ERP Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Sage MAS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "SAP ECC is not cheap but I consider it the best system for managing an organization's data and processes."
  • "This is a costly product."
  • "There are licensing costs."
  • "Some components are available at an additional cost, depending on the type of contract that you have."
  • "The licensing costs are slightly on the higher side. They need to make it more competitive."
  • "SAP is a bit on the costly side, but they also provide support and other things. We are paying for licenses and the use of the cloud."
  • "SAP ERP is expensive."
  • "When you have a solution that is stable, reliable, and has a high performance as this solution, the price is going to be expensive. However, when you evaluate the service you are paying for the cost is quite reasonable for this solution."
  • More SAP ERP Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product provides consistent updates and upgrades.
    Top Answer:The vendor stopped supporting the solution on the Linux platform. We can only use it on Windows. It is very bad. I don't know why they discontinued support for Linux. Now we are supposed to use… more »
    Top Answer:There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of SAP ERP are its stability, industry-specific package, and adaptable configuration.
    Top Answer:One challenge we face with SAP ERP is the push to upgrade to S/4HANA, which comes with significant costs. While SAP encourages this transition, we need to carefully evaluate factors like our team's… more »
    Ranking
    23rd
    out of 66 in ERP
    Views
    468
    Comparisons
    429
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    474
    Rating
    8.0
    1st
    out of 66 in ERP
    Views
    21,994
    Comparisons
    19,694
    Reviews
    36
    Average Words per Review
    433
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MAS
    Learn More
    Overview
    Integrated floral management system with order processing, design room operations, customer service performance, web site integration.
    SAP ERP addresses the core business software requirements of midsize and large organizations in all industries and sectors. SAP ERP includes four individual solutions that support key areas of enterprise resource planning: human capital management, financials, operations, corporate services.
    Sample Customers
    Vesta Stoves, Power Distribution LLC, Electronics Inc, Pinstripe & Pearls
    B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Real Estate/Law Firm10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Healthcare Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company26%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Pharma/Biotech Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Educational Organization6%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise57%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    ERP
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP. Updated: March 2024.
    763,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Sage MAS is ranked 23rd in ERP with 1 review while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 37 reviews. Sage MAS is rated 6.6, while SAP ERP is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Sage MAS writes "The product is easy to use and provides consistent updates and upgrades". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". Sage MAS is most compared with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and Infor M3.

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.