SAP ERP vs Sage MAS comparison

Sage and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. Sage is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Sage holds a 0.3% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 18.7% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Sage users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Sage MAS

Read 4 Sage MAS reviews

246 Views
221 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

SAP ERP

Read 105 SAP ERP reviews

14,855 Views
12,627 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Sage MAS

SAP ERP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAP ERP and Sage MAS compete in the enterprise resource planning category. SAP ERP tends to have an advantage for large enterprises due to its robust integration capabilities, while Sage MAS is better suited for small and mid-sized businesses with its ease of use and specialized tools.

Features: SAP ERP integrates business process management, advanced analytics, and scalability, catering to global enterprises. Sage MAS offers core accounting, inventory management, and project management, which provide reliability for small and medium enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP ERP involves a complex deployment needing professional implementation, supporting larger clients with institutional service. Sage MAS simplifies deployment with flexible hosting options and personalized service, suitable for smaller organizations.

Pricing and ROI: SAP ERP requires a higher upfront investment with a longer ROI due to its comprehensive system and customization. Sage MAS presents a more attractive price point for smaller businesses, offering quicker ROI through lower initial costs and rapid deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP ERP vs. Sage MAS Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP ERP vs. Sage MAS

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,499 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sage MAS

Ranking in ERP

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP ERP

Ranking in ERP

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

105

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Sage MAS is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP ERP is 18.7%, down from 22.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP

Featured Reviews

Mahmoud Paridehpour

VP of Ecommerce & Information Systems at Four Seasons General Merchandise

Offers extensive features for efficient operations in small to midsize businesses

The solution is very good. However, for very small companies, maybe a cloud service is better. Other software like QuickBooks may work well if you do not have many employees and require simple invoicing and inventory. This software, though, is a bit more advanced compared to QuickBooks, offering flexibility, multi-user capability, and options for application development. It connects directly to the database for reporting or external systems, which is beneficial for companies needing more advanced features. However, if I need a very complex system, Sage might not be suitable. Overall, I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Srinivasan Kuppuswamy

Founder Partner & Chief Consultant at Sagesse Abundance

The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status

The solution is not ready for the current e-commerce environment. Its was built for large enterprises who need to predictably optimize their human, material, and financial resources. ERP has evolved and businesses are changing. There are not many large corporations. Most are small enterprises with the capabilities of large enterprises through networking and platform integration. Some companies promote products but get things done with other enterprises as a network. Companies do not want to create new capacity but want to leverage existing capacity with innovative products. They do not want to spend resources on duplicating capacity or facilities. I do not think any ERP product is ready to support this environment so ERPs as a whole might end up being used for back-office functions only. It is not easy to evolve an ERP product because its intent is to integrate functions and processes within an organization. Whereas, in the new business model, processes are not limited to one's own enterprise but cut across different enterprises. There is no enterprise solution as this point in time for the current e-commerce environment so companies must integrate with many solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product provides consistent updates and upgrades."

"Regarding the cost, it is cheap. I pay a one-time fee instead of a monthly license fee per user."

"The technical support is very good."

"For me, it is a ten because I did not have any problems or issues."

"The solution is scalable."

"The solution can easily be standardized across processes."

"It provides great visibility into the details of enterprise resource planning."

"This is a robust and feature-rich solution."

"From a long-term perspective, I can say that the solution can offer a return on investment, but it may take around three to four years for our company to experience it."

"The most valuable feature of SAP ERP is the integration. It can be seamlessly integrated across the board."

"The most significant elements of this solution are the ability to create a virtual product, a service product, and delivery."

"The stability and performance are good."

More SAP ERP pros

Cons

"While the software may not be very expensive, it lacks many advanced features found in other software."

"The vendor stopped supporting the solution on the Linux platform."

"While the software may not be very expensive, it lacks many advanced features found in other software."

"We're definitely looking at a new system because everything in this product needs improving."

"One thing that is lacking in ERP is a good user interface. It is currently very clumsy and complex. Another thing is that reporting capability of SAP ERP is customizable, but it is not very good. Its development time is also very high if you require specialized technical services. If you want to do any changes to the report or develop a new report, you need people with specialized skills. Business processes are very straightforward and standardized as per the industry standards. However, the way it works is a bit complex, and you need to know a lot of things. There are different things that can be complex for a general user. A lot of information is being provided in ERP. A general user doesn't require all this information, and it creates a lot of confusion. Its learning curve is very high."

"The production system must be upgraded."

"Though SAP ERP's FICO module is a strong part of the product, its integration capabilities can be made stronger."

"It has a high cost."

"It's very difficult to find people who are well versed in it."

"The service could be more user-friendly in the area of transition codes."

"There are a lot of manual tasks that are used by a lot of people, so it is a very good candidate for RPA."

"In previous generations, SAP was stable and the roadmap was very predictable, but currently it's very difficult."

More SAP ERP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable."

"There is a license needed to use this solution."

"There is an annual subscription for the use of SAP ERP."

"SAP is quite expensive."

"The solution is expensive so I rate cost a five out of ten."

"I don't know the price, but I know its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Some components are available at an additional cost, depending on the type of contract that you have."

"I rate the product's price a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. SAP ERP is a costly tool."

"I rate SAP ERP's pricing a six or seven out of ten."

More SAP ERP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sage MAS?

The product provides consistent updates and upgrades.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sage MAS?

We pay an annual license fee.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sage MAS?

While the software may not be very expensive, it lacks many advanced features found in other software. There are not many extensions available compared to other ERP platforms. The technology is a l...

See all answers

Is Anaplan better than SAP ERP?

There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time co...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP ERP?

The solution has made the most significant impact on our human resources function, specifically in HR operations and HR analytics. One feature of SAP ERP that I found most valuable is its use of co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP ERP?

SAP ERP could improve by integrating additional components such as digital signatures and barcoding. Having such features embedded within the ERP would be more beneficial rather than relying on ext...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Infor M3 vs SAP ERP

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs SAP ERP

Compared 12% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs SAP ERP

Compared 11% of the time

Anaplan vs SAP ERP

Compared 10% of the time

Infor LN vs SAP ERP

Compared 10% of the time

More SAP ERP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ERP

June 2025

Download Sage MAS product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP ERP

June 2025

Download SAP ERP product report

Also Known As

MAS

No data available

Overview

Integrated floral management system with order processing, design room operations, customer service performance, web site integration.

Sage

SAP ERP addresses the core business software requirements of midsize and large organizations in all industries and sectors. SAP ERP includes four individual solutions that support key areas of enterprise resource planning: human capital management, financials, operations, corporate services.

SAP

Sample Customers

Vesta Stoves, Power Distribution LLC, Electronics Inc, Pinstripe & Pearls

B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.

Buyer's Guide

SAP ERP vs. Sage MAS

July 2025

Free Report: SAP ERP vs. Sage MAS

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP ERP vs. Sage MAS and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP ERP vs. Sage MAS report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.