Red Hat AMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Red Hat and Broadcom are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Red Hat is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6. Red Hat holds a 8.9% mindshare in MQ, compared to Broadcom’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Red Hat AMQ

Read 10 Red Hat AMQ reviews

1,991 Views
1,434 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 84 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

4,408 Views
1,366 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Red Hat AMQ compete in data management and messaging platforms. VMware Tanzu holds an edge in scalability and data warehousing, while Red Hat AMQ excels in reliability and messaging capabilities.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is notable for its massively parallel processing architecture, efficient schema backup, and robust ETL capabilities. It supports integration with procedural languages like Python, C++, and Perl, providing flexibility for complex data operations. Red Hat AMQ offers reliable and scalable message queuing, real-time data processing, and supports various protocols. Its message persistence and robust integration with technologies like OpenShift are highly valued.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions could enhance its in-memory database performance, stability, and compatibility with newer PostgreSQL versions. It faces reliability challenges in appliances and during upgrades. Red Hat AMQ needs better handling of high message loads, enhanced monitoring, and more user-friendly configurations. Improvements in message ordering and support for larger message volumes are also desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides flexible deployment options across On-premises, Public, and Hybrid Cloud environments. Its customer service and technical support are generally well-received. Red Hat AMQ predominantly deploys on On-premises and Private Cloud platforms. Its technical support has mixed reviews, with some users noting responsiveness and documentation could be improved.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is open-source with commercial support options, offering a cost-effective solution with competitive pricing. Red Hat AMQ is also open-source but is seen as more cost-effective when combined with OpenShift. Users note that pricing could be more competitive, though both platforms offer substantial ROI based on infrastructure needs and support preferences.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,360 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (6th), Relational Databases Tools (13th), Data Warehouse (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Red Hat AMQ is 8.9%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 7.0%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	7.0%
Red Hat AMQ	8.9%
Other	84.1%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

SachinJain

Senior Technical Specialist at Intuitive Technology Partners

Efficiently manages high availability and fault tolerance for critical systems with user-friendly management features

I have experience with features such as message persistence and fault tolerance because I configured high availability and fault tolerance for the client environment, including active-active and active-passive configurations. I mainly prefer active-active. I created a security feature for user authentication and authorization in Red Hat AMQ using vault. When you enable the vault, then your whole Red Hat AMQ becomes more secure. Management is straightforward. I configured it and created documentation. The operations team takes care of the operation part. I educate them on how to manage access, so they can easily add new people who join the company or manage the people who leave. The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring. On the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails. It also shows utilization in the tool. These features also come with other AMQs such as Amazon and IBM.

Read full review

Moisés Guillén

Has improved server deployment speed and simplified Kubernetes cluster administration

My main use case for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is Tanzu Basic TKB version 2.4 I focus on the creation of Kubernetes clusters with VMware Tanzu Data Solutions. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has positively impacted my organization because it is efficient, easy, fast, and aids in the creation and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

"Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"

"Very fast for query processing."

"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."

"The product is not complex."

"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."

"The solution can scale."

"Reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff."

"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."

Cons

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."

"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."

"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."

"I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols."

"It doesn't have any GUI-based monitoring tools."

"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."

"The initial setup is somewhat complex and the out-of-the-box configuration requires optimization."

"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"The solution is open-source."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"The pricing is okay."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"It is an open-source product."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The areas for improvement include cost, which is a primary concern. The deployment process is simple, but the cost is very important. Additionally, the management portal should be more user-friendl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

For use cases for Red Hat AMQ, let's take banking purposes. This depends upon the firm or the service or product company. For example, let's take HDFC Bank or any other bank. Whenever a customer de...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat AMQ?

I work primarily with Red Hat. For IBM, I have worked with their channel partner, not directly with IBM. For Amazon, I work with partners only. I am working with one company as a consultant. I also...

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware RabbitMQ?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

Comparisons

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 30% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 28% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Event Streams vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Kafka vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

January 2026

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

January 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

February 2026

Free Report: Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.