We performed a comparison between Red Hat AMQ and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."
"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."
"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."
"Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"It can be configured to be a very fast message broker. I like the stability, the built-in admin tools and plugin architecture."
"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room."
"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."
"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."
"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."
"The user interface could be improved."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."
"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."
To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).
Red Hat AMQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 3 reviews while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 4 reviews. Red Hat AMQ is rated 8.6, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Red Hat AMQ writes "Flexible, cost-effective, good compatibility with the OpenShift platform, effective and timely support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A good tool that's simple to use and is great for messaging". Red Hat AMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, IBM MQ, IBM Event Streams and Amazon SQS, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, PubSub+ Event Broker and Anypoint MQ. See our Red Hat AMQ vs. VMware RabbitMQ report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.