ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Apache and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Apache is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Red Hat is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. Apache holds a 20.1% mindshare in MQ, compared to Red Hat’s 5.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

ActiveMQ

Read 28 ActiveMQ reviews

5,809 Views
5,635 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Read 10 Red Hat AMQ reviews

2,337 Views
1,799 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ActiveMQ

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

ActiveMQ and Red Hat AMQ are competing products in the messaging and integration market. Red Hat AMQ generally has an advantage due to its robust support and scalability features.

Features: ActiveMQ provides simplicity and flexibility with multi-protocol support and efficient message filtering. It allows durable subscriptions and features a robust plugin architecture. Red Hat AMQ is recognized for its scalability, advanced security features, and a sophisticated management console, which makes it more suitable for large-scale enterprise deployments.

Room for Improvement: ActiveMQ could enhance its support structures to provide users with more guided assistance. Additionally, improvements in the management console could streamline operations for larger enterprises. Red Hat AMQ might improve pricing structures for smaller businesses and refine documentation to match community support availability and cost-effectiveness of deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat AMQ offers a guided installation process and robust customer support, which facilitates smooth deployment. Conversely, ActiveMQ's straightforward deployment benefits from community support, which may require extra time for troubleshooting but provides flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: ActiveMQ offers a cost-effective solution with minimal setup costs, making it appealing for organizations with budget constraints. The return on investment is substantial for smaller projects. Red Hat AMQ, while having higher initial costs due to its advanced features and support structures, provides long-term ROI benefits for businesses needing a scalable and reliable messaging platform.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveMQ vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveMQ vs. Red Hat AMQ

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,402 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of ActiveMQ is 20.1%, down from 26.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat AMQ is 5.8%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ActiveMQ	20.1%
Red Hat AMQ	5.8%
Other	74.1%

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

MoumitaDas

Software Engineer III at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Integration capabilities enhance message handling without human interaction

With ActiveMQ there should be more options. If you work with other technologies, for example, Java, there are many options. We can integrate the way we want ActiveMQ. We can create partitions and clusters, but AP is not providing such options currently. It only provides time, request response timing, the number of requests that need to be handled, and protocol types. The configuration needs to be broadened inside AP to perform in a better way. Sometimes issues arise in production with ActiveMQ due to the number of requests. For example, if you have configured one thousand requests at a time and it receives one thousand and one messages at a time, it breaks. The configuration aspect is tricky. When configurations are proper, ActiveMQ almost has zero errors.

Read full review

SachinJain

Senior Technical Specialist at Intuitive Technology Partners

Efficiently manages high availability and fault tolerance for critical systems with user-friendly management features

I have experience with features such as message persistence and fault tolerance because I configured high availability and fault tolerance for the client environment, including active-active and active-passive configurations. I mainly prefer active-active. I created a security feature for user authentication and authorization in Red Hat AMQ using vault. When you enable the vault, then your whole Red Hat AMQ becomes more secure. Management is straightforward. I configured it and created documentation. The operations team takes care of the operation part. I educate them on how to manage access, so they can easily add new people who join the company or manage the people who leave. The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring. On the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails. It also shows utilization in the tool. These features also come with other AMQs such as Amazon and IBM.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ActiveMQ demonstrates excellent stability and sturdiness."

"Message broadcasting: There could be a use case sending the same message to all consumers. So as a producer, I broadcast the message to a topic. Then, whichever consumers are subscribed to the topic can consume the same message."

"There is a vibrant community, and it is one of the strongest points of this product. We always get answers to our problems. So, my experience with the community support has been good."

"It is cost effective and is a much cheaper solution compared to Weblogic or IBM MQ."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the holding and forwarding."

"The most important feature is that it's best for JVM-related languages and JMS integration."

"Reliable message delivery and mirroring."

"It's a very easy-to-use product, documentation is sufficient, and anyone with a bit of knowledge about technology, like Java, can quickly set it up and it could be up and running in minutes."

More ActiveMQ pros

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"The benefits of using Red Hat AMQ include easy configuration and monitoring; on the portal, I can monitor how many packets or alerts have been generated or sent to the end user via Red Hat AMQ along with messages or emails, and it also shows utilization in the tool."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

"From the functionality perspective, 3scale provides a very comparable, if not the same feature set as any leader in the market for API management and the gateway perspective, but with a fraction of the price."

"My impression is that it is average in terms of scalability."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

Cons

"One potential area would be the complexity of the initial setup."

"It does not scale out well. It ends up being very complex if you have a lot of mirror queues."

"From the TPS point of view, it's like 100,000 transactions that need to be admitted from different devices and also from the different minor small systems. Those are best fit for Kafka. We have used it on the customer side, and we thought of giving a try to ActiveMQ, but we have to do a lot of performance tests and approval is required before we can use it for this scale."

"There is need for more protocols and maybe they should provide documentation on the internet as well."

"There are some stability issues."

"AI capabilities require improvement in future updates."

"The solution's stability needs improvement."

"The solution can improve the other protocols to equal the AMQ protocol they offer."

More ActiveMQ cons

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"The product needs to improve its documentation and training."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

"Red Hat AMQ's cost could be improved, and it could have better integration."

"The areas for improvement include cost, which is a primary concern."

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is less expensive than its competitors."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions."

"We use the open-source version."

"There are no fees because it is open-source."

"I think the software is free."

"ActiveMQ is open source, so it is free to use."

"It’s open source, ergo free."

"We are using the open-source version, so we have not looked at any pricing."

More ActiveMQ pricing and cost advice

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"The solution is open-source."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,402 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ActiveMQ?

Pricing is something to consider with ActiveMQ, though cloud pricing is not costly and depends upon the compute selection. Focusing on AI is essential nowadays. AI capabilities require improvement ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ActiveMQ?

In my current organization, I'm only working with ActiveMQ. I previously worked with IBM WebSphere MQ.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ActiveMQ?

We have not deployed ActiveMQ's flexible clustering as that requirement is not present for us. We only use active-passive configuration. On a scale of one to ten, I rate ActiveMQ a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The areas for improvement include cost, which is a primary concern. The deployment process is simple, but the cost is very important. Additionally, the management portal should be more user-friendl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

For use cases for Red Hat AMQ, let's take banking purposes. This depends upon the firm or the service or product company. For example, let's take HDFC Bank or any other bank. Whenever a customer de...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat AMQ?

I work primarily with Red Hat. For IBM, I have worked with their channel partner, not directly with IBM. For Amazon, I work with partners only. I am working with one company as a consultant. I also...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MQ vs ActiveMQ

Compared 54% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs ActiveMQ

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveMQ

Compared 5% of the time

PubSub+ Platform vs ActiveMQ

Compared 4% of the time

EMQX vs ActiveMQ

Compared 4% of the time

More ActiveMQ Competitors

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 22% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Event Streams vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon SQS vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveMQ

August 2026

Download ActiveMQ product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

July 2026

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Also Known As

AMQ

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Overview

ActiveMQ is a messaging broker facilitating microservices communication and event management. It supports message queues, Camel routes, and asynchronous communication, enhancing integration capabilities and scalability with a network of brokers.

ActiveMQ efficiently supports message transfer in IoT applications and third-party systems, acting as a hub for code distribution and data flow management. It integrates well with XML and protocols like MQTT, while its fast messaging, reliable delivery, and efficient setup via Docker cater to diverse messaging needs. Though ActiveMQ is cost-effective, challenges exist with scalability, stability, and administration tools. Enhanced documentation and broader protocol support could resolve these issues, improving administration and initial configurations.

What are the key features of ActiveMQ?

Message Queues: Supports efficient queuing systems for distributing messages.
Camel Routes: Facilitates robust routing mechanisms within applications.
High Availability: Ensures reliable service delivery without interruptions.
Asynchronous Communication: Supports real-time interaction across systems.
XML Integration: Provides flexible communication through XML compatibility.
Protocol Support: Works with protocols like MQTT for versatile messaging.
Brokers Network: Enhances scalability with interconnected broker systems.
Docker Setup: Simplifies deployment processes using containerization.

What benefits should users expect from ActiveMQ?

Reliable Delivery: Guarantees messages are delivered promptly and consistently.
Cost-Effectiveness: Ensures affordability for small-scale applications.
Flexible Integration: Offers adaptable messaging solutions with varied systems.
Ease of Setup: Provides straightforward configuration and deployment processes.

ActiveMQ implementation spans industries from IoT, managing device communications and responses, to middleware solutions for payload consumption. It handles registrations and updates, sometimes being used in demonstrations of message broker concepts. Users often leverage it for its message handling efficiency in industry-specific applications.

Apache

Red Hat AMQ provides robust performance with high scalability and security, supporting efficient message processing and various protocols. It integrates with OpenShift and Apache Kafka, making it ideal for event-driven microservices in hybrid environments.

Red Hat AMQ is designed for asynchronous messaging, data synchronization, and real-time notifications. Its strengths include high availability, fault tolerance, and operator-based automation. The lightweight, scalable design enables straightforward management, combined with reliable official support. Integration with ActiveMQ ensures stable and independent installation. Users can also employ connectors and routing on Kubernetes, enhancing its utility for sectors like banking and logistics.

What are the most valuable features of Red Hat AMQ?

Compatibility with OpenShift, facilitating seamless integration
Operator-based automation for streamlined processes
High availability and fault tolerance for continuous operations
Vault-based security ensuring data protection
Scalability and lightweight design for efficient resource use
Support for multiple protocols enhancing flexibility

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Red Hat AMQ?

Scalability for growing business demands
Ease of configuration reducing setup time
Robust performance delivering reliable message processing
Cost advantages offering economic benefits over competitors
Stability from independent installation ensuring resilience

Industries use Red Hat AMQ for asynchronous application messaging, enhancing communication in Master System Integration projects. Sectors like banking utilize it for real-time alerts, while logistics companies leverage it for notifications. Its support for connectors and routing within OpenShift benefits organizations with complex data flow requirements.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc.

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

Buyer's Guide

ActiveMQ vs. Red Hat AMQ

August 2026

Free Report: ActiveMQ vs. Red Hat AMQ

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveMQ vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,402 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveMQ vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.