Amazon SQS vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Logo
11,665 views|11,072 comparisons
Red Hat Logo
5,301 views|3,965 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and Red Hat AMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon SQS vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: November 2022).
654,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective.""I am able to find out what's going on very easily.""There is no setup just some easy configuration required.""The most valuable feature of Amazon SQS is the interface."

More Amazon SQS Pros →

"The most valuable feature is stability.""This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature.""The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day.""The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

More Red Hat AMQ Pros →

Cons
"The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises.""The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules.""I do not think that this solution is easy to use and the documentation of this solution has a lot of problems and can be improved in the next release. Most of the time, the images in the document are from older versions.""It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."

More Amazon SQS Cons →

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly.""This product needs better visualization capabilities in general.""The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow.""There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

More Red Hat AMQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Amazon SQS is more affordable compared to other solutions."
  • "The pricing of Amazon SQS is reasonable. The first million requests are free every month, and after, it's cost 40 cents for every million requests. There are not any additional fees."
  • "Amazon SQS is quite expensive and is at the highest price point compared to other solutions."
  • More Amazon SQS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."
  • "This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."
  • "The solution is open-source."
  • More Red Hat AMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    654,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective.
    Top Answer:Documentation of this solution can be improved. Sometimes, the images in the document are from older versions.
    Top Answer:The primary use case of this solution is for collecting event data for analytic purposes. In our case, when a user selects a function in our app, the information is collected. Analytics is performed… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is stability.
    Top Answer:The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow. The solution is always running a number of versions behind the latest version. They need to run plenty of… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    11,665
    Comparisons
    11,072
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    5,301
    Comparisons
    3,965
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    999
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. Using SQS, you can send, store, and receive messages between software components at any volume, without losing messages or requiring other services to be available. Get started with SQS in minutes using the AWS console, Command Line Interface or SDK of your choice, and three simple commands.

    SQS offers two types of message queues. Standard queues offer maximum throughput, best-effort ordering, and at-least-once delivery. SQS FIFO queues are designed to guarantee that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent.

    To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

    Offer
    Learn more about Amazon SQS
    Learn more about Red Hat AMQ
    Sample Customers
    EMS, NASA, BMW, Capital One
    E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Media Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon SQS vs. Red Hat AMQ
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SQS vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
    654,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon SQS is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 4 reviews while Red Hat AMQ is ranked 7th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 4 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while Red Hat AMQ is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Simple to use and set up with good integration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat AMQ writes "Flexible, cost-effective, good compatibility with the OpenShift platform, effective and timely support". Amazon SQS is most compared with Apache Kafka, Amazon MQ, Oracle Event Hub Cloud Service, IBM MQ and RedisLabs, whereas Red Hat AMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, ActiveMQ, VMware RabbitMQ, IBM MQ and Amazon MQ. See our Amazon SQS vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.