Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Platform vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System comparison

"Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Platform is considered a good leader in its field."

"Qualys offers versatility. It can function both with and without agents, offering flexibility in deployment. Furthermore, it provides comprehensive support for various systems such as Windows Server, Unix servers, and databases, including SQL, Oracle, and others for development."

"The Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System performs excellently."

"The monitoring is the most valuable feature."

"It integrates easily."

"The most valuable feature is the central command center, where we can control and manage the solution."

"What I like about Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is that it works okay. I don't have time to mess with the tool most of the time because I have way too many tasks to do, but Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System tells you when there's a problem, then it blocks the problem, so that's what I like most about it."

"A standout feature of TippingPoint is its strong integration with various solutions. It stands out as one of the leading network Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) in the current market and is known for its seamless integration with other solutions. For instance, when it identifies a potential threat within the traffic stream, it meticulously analyzes the data. Even in multilayer security scenarios, Tipping Point's network IPS can serve as a bypass for the basic firewall. If a threat is identified by Tipping Point, it promptly shares this information with the other systems. This ensures that they're updated and can employ the necessary solutions from their signature databases. The entire network gets safeguarded automatically. This integration extends to components like security and FX. This linkage streamlines our operations, offering a consolidated point of control for managing threats effectively."

"Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is very stable. In addition, the provider gives notice of any changes well in advance, which is important for planning updates."

"I would rate TTPS's stability eight out of ten."

"The report sometimes inaccurately identifies the corresponding operating system version."

"It integrates well but it takes time."

"The firewall rules are limited."

"TTPS is a bit behind in visuals, the UI, and some data elements."

"I would like to see this solution more lightweight and easier to install."

"We need more integration. It would be good if Azure IPS and TippingPoint IPS and other products from Trend Micro like their DBI and IWSVA could talk between each other."

"The solution is pretty expensive."

"Premium support is lucrative but it is very expensive."

"Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System needs strong Spanish-language support."

"We pay for Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System yearly. The cost increases if you add more users."

"TTPS is reasonably priced."

"Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is an expensive product."

"TippingPoint is not as expensive as Palo Alto but it's not as cheap as Fortigate."

"It is an expensive solution and I would rate it three out of ten."

"It's an expensive product."

"The price is in a market-suitable price range. So it's not expensive, but it's also not cheap either. The price is a strong point."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."