We performed a comparison between QAD Cloud ERP and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."
"The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."
"One of the most valuable features, which we used the most, was the FI module, for finance. It involved controlling, account receivables, account payables, and complete financial steering."
"It's reliable and the performance is good."
"The functionality of SAP S4HANA is very good when comparing it to others, such as Oracle, Microsoft, and other ERP solutions."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The Fiori design is a valuable feature."
"From a technology standpoint, the theory and analytics are fascinating."
"S/4HANA is so much faster today than it was before. High performance is one of the best features, but the backbone of S/4HANA is its integration capabilities. They've also shifted to a focus on user experience."
"The performance of the solution is excellent."
"The product lacks a lot of features and technology."
"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."
"This is a costly solution."
"The customer service and support are average. There is room for improvement in response time."
"This solution works with the configuration, if the prerequisites are very clear and can be configured it works perfectly. If you need to simulate something, as a predictive tool this kind of simulation is not very accurate and it has limitations. This is something that could improve."
"This product would be improved by adding more reports."
"The migration to SAP S/4HANA is hard."
"Their yearly licensing is expensive. Improvements are needed on the user experience level and digital work."
"During parallel preparation of go-live processes, SAP B1 and S4H transactional data alignment can be difficult to track."
"The solution is complex technically because both an old and a new path exist."
QAD Cloud ERP is ranked 25th in ERP with 2 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. QAD Cloud ERP is rated 7.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QAD Cloud ERP writes "The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". QAD Cloud ERP is most compared with IFS Cloud Platform, SAP ERP, NetSuite ERP and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.