Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
QAD Cloud ERP Logo

Top 10 QAD Cloud ERP Alternatives

Vendor: QAD
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top QAD Cloud ERP Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to QAD Cloud ERP based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, and Oracle E-Business Suite. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

QAD Cloud ERP surpasses its competitors by delivering industry-specific functionality, real-time analytics, and flexible deployment options, enhancing operational efficiency and providing robust support for complex global manufacturing needs.

QAD Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with QAD, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
SAP ERP
4.0 out of 5
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
SAP ERP
4.0 out of 5
SAP ERP offers comprehensive features for large enterprises, emphasizing scalability and integration. In comparison, QAD Cloud ERP suits mid-sized companies with industry-specific capabilities and quick deployment. SAP's high initial costs reflect its feature set, while QAD offers cost-effective, faster ROI solutions.
Download QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP ERP Report
SAP ERP's setup cost is typically higher due to its comprehensive features and infrastructure, while QAD Cloud ERP offers a more cost-effective setup, ideal for businesses seeking affordable, flexible options.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP ERP's setup cost is typically higher due to its comprehensive features and infrastructure, while QAD Cloud ERP offers a more cost-effective setup, ideal for businesses seeking affordable, flexible options.
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
SAP S/4HANA
4.2 out of 5
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
SAP S/4HANA
4.2 out of 5
QAD Cloud ERP is attractive for its agile manufacturing and resource planning. In comparison, SAP S/4HANA provides robust features like real-time analytics and extensive integration. A tech buyer may choose QAD for affordability and flexibility, while SAP appeals with comprehensive capabilities for complex businesses.
Download QAD Cloud ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA Report
QAD Cloud ERP typically has a lower setup cost compared to SAP S/4HANA, making QAD potentially more cost-effective for initial implementation, whereas SAP’s higher setup cost may be reflective of its comprehensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
QAD Cloud ERP typically has a lower setup cost compared to SAP S/4HANA, making QAD potentially more cost-effective for initial implementation, whereas SAP’s higher setup cost may be reflective of its comprehensive capabilities.
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
Oracle E-Business Suite
3.9 out of 5
Oracle E-Business Suite provides robust enterprise-grade applications with comprehensive analytics, ideal for large organizations. In comparison, QAD Cloud ERP offers flexibility and modern cloud capabilities, appealing to businesses seeking adaptability. Oracle emphasizes integrated management, while QAD focuses on agility and quick deployment.
Download Oracle E-Business Suite vs. QAD Cloud ERP Report
Oracle E-Business Suite generally involves a higher setup cost while QAD Cloud ERP offers more budget-friendly initial pricing. The significant cost difference in implementation impacts the initial investment for businesses considering these ERP systems.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle E-Business Suite generally involves a higher setup cost while QAD Cloud ERP offers more budget-friendly initial pricing. The significant cost difference in implementation impacts the initial investment for businesses considering these ERP systems.
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central offers flexibility in pricing and integration with Microsoft Office 365, appealing to businesses prioritizing financial management and customization. In comparison, QAD Cloud ERP attracts companies with its superior manufacturing and supply chain capabilities, providing industry-specific functionalities for specialized needs.
Download Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central vs. QAD Cloud ERP Report
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central setup costs are relatively higher compared to QAD Cloud ERP, providing a more extensive set of features and customization options. In contrast, QAD Cloud ERP offers lower initial setup expenses, focusing on streamlined processes and cost-effective...
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central setup costs are relatively higher compared to QAD Cloud ERP, providing a more extensive set of features and customization options. In contrast, QAD Cloud ERP offers lower initial setup expenses, focusing on streamlined processes and cost-effective...
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
IFS Cloud Platform
3.9 out of 5
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
IFS Cloud Platform
3.9 out of 5
IFS Cloud Platform offers extensive integration and customizable modules for varied business sizes. In comparison, QAD Cloud ERP provides strong industry-specific features with a focus on manufacturing. Tech buyers may select IFS for affordability and flexibility, while QAD suits those seeking specialized industry benefits.
Download IFS Cloud Platform vs. QAD Cloud ERP Report
IFS Cloud Platform features a lower setup cost compared to QAD Cloud ERP, which makes IFS a more cost-effective solution for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
IFS Cloud Platform features a lower setup cost compared to QAD Cloud ERP, which makes IFS a more cost-effective solution for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
4.1 out of 5
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers robust customization for large enterprises with advanced features, while QAD Cloud ERP provides easier integration for smaller firms. In comparison, QAD Cloud ERP’s cloud deployment is rapid and cost-efficient, appealing to businesses seeking agility and scalability.
Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. QAD Cloud ERP Report
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne typically has a higher setup cost, while QAD Cloud ERP offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne typically has a higher setup cost, while QAD Cloud ERP offers a more affordable initial investment.
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
Epicor ERP
3.7 out of 5
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
Epicor ERP
3.7 out of 5
QAD Cloud ERP offers competitive pricing and strong manufacturing features, appealing to cost-conscious tech buyers focused on swift deployment. In comparison, Epicor ERP provides extensive business intelligence and industry versatility, attracting those interested in comprehensive solutions with potential for significant long-term ROI.
Download Epicor ERP vs. QAD Cloud ERP Report
QAD Cloud ERP has a lower setup cost compared to Epicor ERP, highlighting its affordability for businesses looking to reduce initial expenses. Epicor ERP's higher setup cost may reflect its comprehensive features and customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
QAD Cloud ERP has a lower setup cost compared to Epicor ERP, highlighting its affordability for businesses looking to reduce initial expenses. Epicor ERP's higher setup cost may reflect its comprehensive features and customization options.
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
Epicor iScala
3.0 out of 5
QAD Cloud ERP Logo
Epicor iScala
3.0 out of 5

Growth of our customers'​ business is at the heart of what we do. The strength of Epicor business solutions lies in a simplified approach to technology, inspired by our customers and how they work. More than 45 years of experience with our customers’ unique processes and operational requirements is built into every solution.

Compared to local ERP solutions, it's on the higher side.
View comparison
Pricing
Compared to local ERP solutions, it's on the higher side.

Related categories

ERP
Field Service Management
Activity Based Costing Software