QAD Cloud ERP vs SAP ERP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
QAD Logo
554 views|393 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
22,215 views|19,721 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between QAD Cloud ERP and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP.
To learn more, read our detailed ERP Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with.""The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."

More QAD Cloud ERP Pros →

"SAP ERP offers a wide range of functional modules, including payroll, HR, financials, and others.""We like that we have real-time dashboard views.""It's a good ERP system.""It has been quite stable so far.""ERP is stable. The outcome is clear to us as far as the design goes.""This is a robust solution with a lot of control measures.""It meets our requirements for what we need it to do in the manufacturing industry.""The most valuable features of SAP ERP is the flexibility and functionality. It is one of the best ERPs I have seen in the market."

More SAP ERP Pros →

Cons
"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time.""The product lacks a lot of features and technology."

More QAD Cloud ERP Cons →

"It is not flexible for the users. SAP works in a specific way, and the users and the processes have to adapt to the way it works. It is hard to customize it to the level that we need for our work. It is not easy to get new extensions for process functions, modules, or activities.""SAP ERP needs to consider simplifying a few areas within the tool. Compared to SAP ERP, other solutions in the market are much more easily configurable and understandable. SAP has a lot of complex features.""The speed to build and the speed to deliver could be better.""The power of ABAP Development Tools is the main valuable feature in the SAP ECC system. Every couple of years SAP upgrades ABAP technology significantly, which facilitates developers' work.""The user interface can be more intuitive and user-friendly by having it be more menu-driven, this would be a large benefit.""It has a high cost.""The user interface isn't as nice as SAP HANA's.""It is a little difficult to use."

More SAP ERP Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "SAP ECC is not cheap but I consider it the best system for managing an organization's data and processes."
  • "This is a costly product."
  • "There are licensing costs."
  • "Some components are available at an additional cost, depending on the type of contract that you have."
  • "The licensing costs are slightly on the higher side. They need to make it more competitive."
  • "SAP is a bit on the costly side, but they also provide support and other things. We are paying for licenses and the use of the cloud."
  • "SAP ERP is expensive."
  • "When you have a solution that is stable, reliable, and has a high performance as this solution, the price is going to be expensive. However, when you evaluate the service you are paying for the cost is quite reasonable for this solution."
  • More SAP ERP Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with.
    Top Answer:I rate the pricing an eight out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:The product lacks a lot of features and technology. It is really limited. The tool must improve in almost all areas. There are a lot of things that should be improved in the manufacturing and shop… more »
    Top Answer:There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has made the most significant impact on our human resources function, specifically in HR operations and HR analytics. One feature of SAP ERP that I found most valuable is its use of codes… more »
    Top Answer:The product can be a little slow when dealing with thousands of employee data.
    Ranking
    25th
    out of 68 in ERP
    Views
    554
    Comparisons
    393
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    530
    Rating
    5.0
    1st
    out of 68 in ERP
    Views
    22,215
    Comparisons
    19,721
    Reviews
    36
    Average Words per Review
    439
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    SAP S/4HANA logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Microsoft Dynamics AX logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Anaplan logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    SAP Business One logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Infor M3 logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    MFG/PRO
    Learn More
    Overview

    QAD Cloud ERP is an enterprise resource planning solution designed exclusively for global manufacturing. It supports best-in-class, industry-specific business processes and flexible deployment options.

    SAP ERP addresses the core business software requirements of midsize and large organizations in all industries and sectors. SAP ERP includes four individual solutions that support key areas of enterprise resource planning: human capital management, financials, operations, corporate services.
    Sample Customers
    Tower International, Kendra Scott
    B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Educational Organization9%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company25%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Pharma/Biotech Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Educational Organization6%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise46%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    ERP
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    QAD Cloud ERP is ranked 25th in ERP with 2 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. QAD Cloud ERP is rated 7.0, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QAD Cloud ERP writes "The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". QAD Cloud ERP is most compared with IFS Cloud Platform, SAP S/4HANA, NetSuite ERP and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and Infor M3.

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.