Planisware vs Procore Project Management comparison

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"Overall, our company has all disintegrated systems, and with Planisware, we are getting a very integrated view of my portfolio reporting, cost and load, and everything else."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

"Other companies have been using it for years, and it is a very stable platform."

"The coordination between the field and the office without the need to print or physically transport drawings is very valuable."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

"It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It takes time to use it. It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It comes with a high cost."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"There are training and certification costs."

"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."