Ping Identity Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Ping Identity and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Ping Identity is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while Red Hat is ranked #17. Ping Identity holds a 4.6% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Ping Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Ping Identity Platform

Read 32 Ping Identity Platform reviews

10,484 Views
3,984 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

1,573 Views
1,557 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and Red Hat Single Sign On are frequently compared solutions in the identity and access management space. Red Hat Single Sign On stands out owing to its robust features, making it a worthwhile investment for many users.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers comprehensive authentication capabilities, adaptive MFA, and risk analysis. Red Hat Single Sign On provides seamless integration with multiple applications, efficient session management, and integrative flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could improve its documentation, simplify its configuration complexity, and enhance its scalability. Red Hat Single Sign On needs better customer support, improved scalability, and enhanced deployment documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform is challenging to deploy, requiring significant time and expertise, with responsive but sometimes slow customer service. Red Hat Single Sign On is easier to deploy with quicker setup times, though its customer service needs enhancements for faster support.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform has high initial setup costs but offers a favorable long-term ROI due to its advanced capabilities. Red Hat Single Sign On is perceived as more cost-effective initially, with satisfactory ROI driven by its strong feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (9th), Data Governance (17th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (9th), Access Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 4.6%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 1.5%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform	4.6%
Red Hat Single Sign On	1.5%
Other	93.9%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

AmitRathod

Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited

Single sign-on has simplified access while adaptive authentication protects complex user journeys

Regarding areas for improvement in Ping Identity Platform, there is not much. In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation. It provides greater feasibility, but it takes a very long time in terms of complete building. There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems. Additionally, issue troubleshooting can be difficult at times. Sometimes issues can be difficult to diagnose and require extensive technical expertise. There is also a very steep learning curve for administrative purposes and potential difficulties with offline authentication scenarios.

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."

"PingID is very good, it's pretty stable as a product and we've never faced any issues, at least with the data applications integration, and the customers really like it."

"I would recommend PingFederate as an IAM solution for its no-code environment, single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, bidirectional services, and advanced features."

"The most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based capabilities for handling cloud applications and providing authentication and authorization through OIDC and SAML. It also supports integrations needed for both local and internal applications, including legacy applications requiring web server access."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

"I like that the solution is open source and you can use a commercial edition of it without any charge."

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

Cons

"They could enhance the product's device tracking for better zero-trust security would be beneficial. Currently, it tracks IPs well but lacks detailed device information, which is crucial from a security standpoint."

"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."

"For external customers, they do have challenges, although there are solutions for that available, as well."

"The product is not customizable."

"It requires some expertise to set up and manage."

"Some colleagues have mentioned API connectivity, data security, and privacy issues."

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

"From the improvement perspective, they could bring IGA capability, which right now they only have in their SaaS offering."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

"Security could be improved."

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

"I think they could provide additional features in terms of users trying to manipulate the system with regard to security."

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"The product is costly."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"The license is around $8000 USD."

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingFederate?

Regarding pricing for Ping Identity Platform, I would rate it eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingAccess?

The areas where I think PingFederate needs room for improvement include that the most significant area I would recommend is that things such as redirects still do not have majority of the applicati...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PingAccess?

The main use case for PingFederate is that we are maintaining the centralized single sign-on with DuroSengel and Carabras as the two main instances to review. If any application is hosted outside o...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 4% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 25% of the time

Okta Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 7% of the time

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 7% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Sign-On vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

July 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

July 2026

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Overview

Ping Identity Platform offers cloud capabilities for applications, supporting Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and passwordless authentication. It features flexible integrations and federated identity management, enhancing security through detailed compliance features and seamless IDP integration.

This platform meets enterprise needs with role-based access control, device management, API security, and risk-based adaptations. Its BYOD support, ease of integration, biometric authentication methods, and customizable options with PingFederate aid in enhancing security and convenience. Challenges such as the complex management console, network reliability, and limited customization are present. Users find areas for improvement in incident response features, bio-certification, and network handling for IP classification. Community support and documentation need strengthening to address existing device tracking and token management issues.

What are the key features of Ping Identity Platform?

Cloud Capabilities: Built for cloud applications with flexible integrations.
Federated Identity Management: Allows easy integration of multiple IDPs.
SSO and MFA Support: Ensure secure and seamless access.
Passwordless Authentication: Enhances user convenience.
API and Device Management: Protects and secures devices and APIs.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Ping Identity Platform?

Enhanced Security: Through detailed compliance features and multi-protocol support.
User Convenience: Enabled by passwordless access and integration flexibility.
Improved Access Control: With role-based permissions and identity management integration.
Seamless Integration: Across a range of identity providers and authentication protocols.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and IT, enterprises deploy Ping Identity Platform for its ability to implement seamless SSO and MFA. It integrates with protocols like SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect to secure communications and user identities. This enhances security and user convenience for customer-facing and internal applications.

Ping Identity

Red Hat Single Sign On is an open-source platform offering fast, scalable, and customizable SSO solutions. It supports popular protocols and integrates with social logins and enterprise solutions to provide seamless authentication across applications.

Red Hat Single Sign On provides fast and flexible authentication, enhancing security across different applications. It supports standardized SSO protocols like OpenID Connect and integrates easily with multiple platforms. Its open-source nature, backed by Red Hat's commercial support, allows community contributions and adaptable capabilities. However, it could improve its integration with Windows products and enhance its security features, including detection mechanisms and audit reports. Scalability and documentation are key areas for development, and users seek advanced tracking for unauthorized access attempts.

What are the key features of Red Hat Single Sign On?

Open Source: Community-driven with extensive documentation and flexibility for customization.
SSO Protocol Support: Compatible with standard protocols like OpenID Connect for seamless integration.
Social Login Integration: Easily integrates with social platforms, enhancing user experience.
Scalable Design: Efficiently handles authentication across multiple clusters.
Commercial Support: Backed by Red Hat for professional support and reliability.

What benefits or ROI should be evaluated when considering Red Hat Single Sign On?

Enhanced Security: Streamlined processes reduce risk, ensuring secure access across applications.
Flexibility: Open-source nature offers adaptable functionality for diverse requirements.
Community Contributions: Benefits from continuous improvements and new features.
Cost-Effective: Transition from Keycloak to paid subscription offers robust capabilities.

Industries, especially those requiring robust security and scalability, implement Red Hat Single Sign On to manage authentication. It integrates with enterprise solutions and identity providers, streamlining login processes and reducing complexities. Organizations appreciate its adaptability when transitioning from Keycloak, experiencing enhanced application authentication and password security.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

August 2026

Free Report: Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.