We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have a perpetual license for 2FA."
"FortiAuthenticator is a very good solution. It is all jury-based. FortiAuthenticator is very easy for anyone to understand how it works and be able to take action."
"The current version is stable...Scalability-wise, it is a fine solution"
"Simple to deploy, simple to use, and user-friendly."
"The product enables SSO."
"FortiAuthenticator is really good software that integrates very well with Fortinet products."
"The product's on-premise version doesn't have recurring costs."
"The most valuable features are the performance and ease of use."
"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."
"Good support for single sign-on protocols."
"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."
"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."
"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."
"The product must provide 2FA for applications."
"A better integration with other vendors."
"We have issues with HA (high availability). These should be addressed in future releases."
"The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"Lacks a simplified two-factor authentication process."
"We've had some issues with integration."
"There are multiple areas that are in need of improvement. It is not a mature product."
"I would like to see more security features in reference to identity login or identity identification."
"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."
"The product’s technical support services could be better."
"Security could be improved."
"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews while Red Hat Single Sign On is ranked 11th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while Red Hat Single Sign On is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Single Sign On writes "It is very easy to scale and use as you want, but there could be more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Red Hat Single Sign On is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0, Okta Workforce Identity, PingFederate and AWS IAM Identity Center. See our Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.