Parasoft SOAtest vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

1,604 Views
1,150 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Testim compete in the software testing tool space. Parasoft SOAtest shines with its pricing and strong customer support, while Testim stands out with advanced features, making it a preferred choice despite a higher cost.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest excels in API and web service testing, supporting diverse protocols and allowing extensive customization without scripting. Its integration with tools like Jenkins is highly valued. Testim is known for its AI-driven automation and simple user interface, enabling easy creation of scalable tests. Its record and playback capabilities make it user-friendly for those with limited coding knowledge.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance cloud deployment options and reduce the initial setup time. Its scripting environment, although versatile, might be daunting for beginners. Testim could focus on expanding customer support and provide more customization options. It should also address occasional issues with test stability due to its reliance on AI-driven processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest offers an on-premises deployment model, which requires more time to set up, offset by excellent customer support. Testim's cloud-based model allows for quicker integration and frequent updates, although it has limited support options compared to Parasoft.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest demands higher initial costs but delivers ROI via its extensive capabilities. Testim might have higher ongoing costs due to the cloud model, promising ROI through efficiency and time savings. The difference lies in Parasoft's higher upfront cost compensated by capabilities, contrasted with Testim's operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Testim Report (Updated: April 2025).

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Testim

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (27th), API Testing Tools (11th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"Parasoft SOAtest has improved the quality of our automated web services, which can be easily implemented through service chaining and service virtualization."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"They have a feature where they can record traffic and create tests on the report traffic."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"It is a highly stable solution."

More Testim pros

Cons

"One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our ow...

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Comparisons

Compared 23% of the time

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 49% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 13% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Parasoft SOAtest

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Testim