Parasoft SOAtest vs Testim comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft Logo
3,876 views|2,596 comparisons
Testim Logo
1,526 views|848 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft SOAtest and Testim based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, SeleniumHQ, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: December 2022).
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros →

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers.""The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved.""The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios.""We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

More Testim Pros →

Cons
"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons →

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved.""There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements.""The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind.""The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

More Testim Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly. Some aspects were difficult and therefore less useful for us, perhaps we lack the coding knowledge on that.
Top Answer:We are a large company based in India. The primary use case of this solution is for our REST architecture. Parasoft uses different languages like JSON, XML and SORBS. It's like an API testing tool and… more »
Top Answer:In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that… more »
Top Answer:The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers.
Top Answer:I'd advise users to take advantage of the Implementation meetings, monthly discussions, and pro licensing.
Top Answer:The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level. Some lists have values that are returned in different orders… more »
Ranking
23rd
Views
3,876
Comparisons
2,596
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
458
Rating
7.0
18th
Views
1,526
Comparisons
848
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
427
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn More
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Testim
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm22%
Computer Software Company18%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Healthcare Company10%
Manufacturing Company9%
Comms Service Provider6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise68%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise53%
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
December 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, SeleniumHQ, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2022.
657,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Testim is ranked 18th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0, while Testim is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Testim writes "Great REST API features, good technical support, and makes it easy to onboard new testers". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, ReadyAPI Test, Coverity and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Testim is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Functionize, Selenium HQ, TestProject and LambdaTest.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.