We performed a comparison between Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and Planview AdaptiveWork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"I like the project management solution. It's really nice."
"Clarizen's strength is reporting. Aside from reporting, I also like the ability to create customized workflow and custom actions. The workflow rules are handy. For example, you can create custom fields and dependent picklists."
"Clarizen Slide Publisher has helped increase transparency and communication with project stakeholders for us."
"The feature that has improved our project planning the most is the ability to create custom workflows, which allows us to automate manual tasks that project managers need to perform. The collaboration feature enhances our team's productivity by allowing individuals to see the impact of their decisions on projects owned and managed by other teams."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"One specific area for improvement could be implementing a development environment to test workflows with live production data."
"If I start customizing too many things, Clarizen tends to get really slow in our environment and especially if I'm tunneled in an environment, like if I'm connected to my VPN."
"I felt like the slide publisher isn't that user-friendly. I think it wasn't that easy to use or to figure out because of formatting constraints, or maybe we need to get better at understanding some of its limitations."
"It could be more user-friendly. I think it is too overwhelming, initially, in terms of possibilities and so on."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews while Planview AdaptiveWork is ranked 21st in Project Management Software with 8 reviews. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2, while Planview AdaptiveWork is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Planview AdaptiveWork writes "Has resources management and timesheets but could be more flexible". Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, JIRA Portfolio, EcoSys, Broadcom Clarity and LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal, whereas Planview AdaptiveWork is most compared with Planview PPM Pro, Broadcom Clarity , Jira and Smartsheet. See our Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview AdaptiveWork report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
