OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

OpenText and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while SmartBear is ranked #25 with an average rating of 5.0. OpenText holds a 1.6% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

1,143 Views
800 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

1,693 Views
559 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

ReadyAPI Test and OpenText Functional Testing Lab compete in the testing tools landscape. ReadyAPI Test seems advantageous with its excellent support and competitive pricing for cost-effective solutions while OpenText is recognized for its advanced features despite a higher investment.

Features: ReadyAPI Test offers integrated testing capabilities, seamless API testing support, and an extensive plugin ecosystem. OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides advanced test management, superior integration with development tools, and comprehensive mobile device coverage.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test can enhance its support for complex enterprise environments, expand its mobile testing features, and improve integration with other commercial tools. OpenText could simplify its deployment process, reduce initial costs, and expand support for non-standard test environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test is easy to deploy with comprehensive documentation and highly rated support. OpenText Functional Testing Lab requires a more complex setup due to its extensive features but offers expert support to assist in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test is appreciated for its competitive pricing and favorable ROI, ideal for smaller teams with limited budgets. OpenText, despite its higher initial cost, offers significant ROI through its advanced features for businesses that maximize its capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (4th)

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (12th), API Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 1.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 1.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	1.6%
ReadyAPI Test	1.6%
Other	96.8%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."

"The product is easy to use."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"The solution has some good scanning features."

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The utmost importance lies in the performance of the application."

"The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on."

"The Pro and free version of SoapUI Pro has good technical support."

"API mockups, functional testing, and load testing are valuable features."

"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."

Cons

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy."

"Automation features are not user-friendly."

"Could integrate the graphing module for load testing."

"SoapUI Pro is a little heavy due to the number of features. Previously it was not that heavy. Now the tool is too heavy, they should work on fixing this issue because until your system has lots of resources, you won't be able to use it seamlessly. The performance of the application itself could improve."

"I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests."

"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs."

"The UI should be improved."

"SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"It is free of charge."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"The cost is not that bad."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Non Profit

10%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What do you like most about SoapUI Pro?

The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI Pro?

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 13% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Appium vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 24% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 12% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

January 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

January 2026

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

SoapUI NG Pro

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.