OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0, while SmartBear is ranked #20. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

4,306 Views
3,273 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

4,944 Views
3,362 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

ReadyAPI Test and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web compete in the domain of software testing solutions. OpenText is noted for its advanced feature set, while ReadyAPI Test offers a competitive edge in pricing and support.

Features: ReadyAPI Test offers seamless integration capabilities, robust testing frameworks, and ease of project and test suite setup. OpenText facilitates advanced mobile testing tools, automation features, and multi-device testing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test could enhance its mobile testing flexibility and expand automation functionalities. OpenText might benefit from simplifying its setup process, improving deployment flexibility, and refining user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test provides straightforward deployment with strong support channels, making integration within existing systems seamless. OpenText offers similar customer service quality but involves a more complex setup process due to its extensive functionality.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test is known for its affordable pricing, making it suitable for smaller budgets while ensuring good ROI. OpenText, although having higher initial setup costs, promises substantial ROI due to its broader testing functionalities for larger operations.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (4th)

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (9th), API Testing Tools (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 2.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
ReadyAPI Test	2.3%
Other	95.7%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

"We evaluated other mobile testing solutions and found this to be superior to all of them."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

"ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."

"The ideas and possibilities that this tool has are incredibly useful."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"The advantage is that the product is handy for testers, user friendly; ability to use load, security tests or create mocks."

"The ability to analyse and simulate web services are clearly the main value."

"The solution offers excellent integration capabilities."

"One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful."

"I primarily use Soap UI to test XML/JSON requests and responses for APIs hosted by us and our vendors."

"The tool’s scalability is very good."

"We chose this tool because it's lightweight, simple and intuitive."

"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."

Cons

"Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"I don't think the product as it is right now is going to sell itself, but it's really what are the next steps."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."

"There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases."

"The licenses could be more flexible with regards to floating licenses."

"SoapUI Pro could improve by having dashboards."

"The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user."

"The UI could be a bit more flexible."

"The UI should be improved a little."

"In the LoadUI companion the scripts are not user friendly, and it also has a slow startup time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"The cost is not that bad."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 8% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

October 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

October 2026

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

SoapUI NG Pro

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web streamlines testing with automation, Jira and Azure DevOps integration, and real device support, improving deployment flexibility and testing efficiency.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web provides robust automation features, enhancing efficiency through seamless integration with platforms like Jira and Azure DevOps. Users can manage devices for mobile testing with ease, while enjoying comprehensive testing scenarios supported by UFT integration. The lab's features also automate phishing triage and help make informed decisions, facilitating faster application delivery and reducing manual efforts. Users face challenges in device scaling, cloud collaboration, and seek improvements in AI integration and UI accessibility, with interest in expanded support for diverse applications and centralized hosting.

What important features does OpenText Functional Testing Lab offer?

Automation Features: Streamlines testing processes with automation.
Integration with Jira and Azure DevOps: Ensures smooth workflow integration.
Real Device Management: Supports real devices for accurate testing.
UFT Integration: Enriches testing scenarios with comprehensive tools.
Phishing Triage Automation: Enhances decision-making efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Faster Application Delivery: Reduces time-to-market through reduced manual testing.
Enhanced Testing Efficiency: Increases productivity with automation.
Seamless Integration: Ensures cohesive workflows with third-party tools.
Comprehensive Testing Scenarios: Provides flexible deployment options.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab is integral to optimizing software development life cycles across industries, including financial services and system integration. It's used for automating repetitive tasks and performing functional and performance testing in CI/CD pipelines, supporting applications in mobile, web, SAP, and Salesforce environments.

OpenText

ReadyAPI Test is a versatile solution for API testing, known for its flexibility, automation, and ease of setup. It efficiently handles SOAP, REST, and JDBC testing, with a user-friendly interface that supports both technical and non-technical teams.

ReadyAPI Test offers robust capabilities in API testing, including functional, load, and security testing. Features such as Groovy scripting, mock services, and data-driven testing enhance workflow efficiency. It integrates well with project environments, supporting script writing and database validation. Teams benefit from easy navigation and comprehensive testing capabilities, making it suitable for IT clients and software test engineers.

What are the main features of ReadyAPI Test?

Groovy Scripting: Enables advanced testing scenarios and custom functions.
Mock Services: Allows simulation of service responses for more dynamic testing.
Data-Driven Testing: Supports testing with diverse data sets for extensive validation.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances project workflows with seamless environment connections.
Load and Security Testing: Provides efficient performance analysis and security checks.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation for both technical and non-technical users.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Streamlined testing processes reduce time spent on manual tasks.
Flexibility: Adapts to varied testing needs and environments easily.
Comprehensive Testing: Supports a full range of API testing types for different protocols.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces long-term costs through automation and efficient operations.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates better team collaboration with integrated tools.

ReadyAPI Test is deployed across industries for automated and manual API testing. It suits industries like IT services, where it assists software test engineers in end-to-end testing scenarios, including email systems and mainframe integration. Organizations utilize it for extensive testing requirements, offering a range of validation methods across project lifecycles.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test

November 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.