Appium vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Appium and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. Appium is ranked #10 in MDP , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 2.9% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #5 in MTT , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Appium users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Appium

Read 30 Appium reviews

3,511 Views
843 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

3,530 Views
1,341 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Appium

OpenText Functional Testing...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Appium and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Mendix, OutSystems, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Mobile Development Platforms Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Development Platforms

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Appium

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (10th), Regression Testing Tools (8th)

OpenText Functional Testing...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th), Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

Appium and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Appium is designed for Mobile Development Platforms and holds a mindshare of 2.9%, down 3.9% compared to last year.
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web, on the other hand, focuses on Mobile App Testing Tools, holds 6.0% mindshare, up 3.4% since last year.

Mobile Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Appium	2.9%
OutSystems	9.3%
Mendix	8.4%
Other	79.4%

Mobile Development Platforms

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	6.0%
Tricentis Tosca	22.8%
OpenText Functional Testing	20.7%
Other	50.5%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

APARNA SAHA

Independent consultant, at OpenText

Efficient mobile testing with intuitive emulation capabilities and a user-friendly interface

Initial setup for Appium (especially for iOS) is not beginner-friendly.Consumes too much of your host machine's resources, potentially slowing down the machine.Appium Inspector often lacks deep insight or crashes with certain app builds. Improve test flakiness by intelligently selecting robust self-healing locators,simplified installers, better documentation, GUI-based config management,smart wait mechanisms and better failure logs.

Read full review

Kevin Copple

Sr. Quality Assurance Project Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Has reduced the need for scripting knowledge and enabled broader test script creation

The ease of use and zero cost are what I appreciate most about this product. The key for us is their Digital Lab service. With Digital Lab service, you have no control over those devices; you are simply getting an iOS device and using it as it is. Many of our customers are using InTune and other deployment services that have security settings on them. OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web allows us to test with our customers' setup of their device and ensure that the scripts will run against it versus a cloud service that does not have any of their security sizing and cannot truly mimic a real-life scenario. The overall framework of UFT in general helps reduce manual testing efforts for us. The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant. By being able to develop scripts that way, you prevent having to know VB script. I have testers who create manual scripts and are already running the test manually; now they can perform that same effort in UFT One, and it creates the scripts so they do not have to recreate them every time. We do use the product's API integrations at some customers, though I am not as familiar with it as some of my colleagues are. My understanding is that for free, you can set up virtual APIs that do not exist yet, allowing you to mimic that behavior even before your APIs have been built. That is a huge selling feature and a significant zero-cost feature in being able to run your API tests even before the API is finished.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For the particular use case we used Appium for, we felt that it served our purpose completely, and we haven't had any issues with the Python Client for Appium."

"It can be used with different programming languages."

"Obviously because of automation, it reduces manual testing efforts."

"Appium is a great tool, and I recommend it."

"We do not need to pay for the solution. It’s free."

"Appium helps me to do as much as much as I want to."

"It has flaws, but is still much better than any other cross-platform mobile automation tool."

"I haven't explored other solutions in this particular area, but what I like best about Appium is the fact that it shares functions with Selenium. The extension of Selenium functions allows me to use all of the methods that exist in that domain, and it just makes it simpler for me. I've been using Selenium for some time as well, so using Appium just seems like a natural fit for me."

More Appium pros

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"The ideas and possibilities that this tool has are incredibly useful."

"Using the existing enterprise tools, like UFT, or even if you want to go open source, you can use them and it's a real user-functional performance, we are able to achieve that."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"This is a solution that's easy to use and it also gives us the possibility to use real devices connected either on the Mobile Center server or on our own computers and it works with both iOS and Android devices."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

Cons

"We haven't been able to fully leverage Appium for multiple reasons. I think number one is just that the tests take a long time to run. We have had some issues around just the results themselves and how predictable they are, but those are not issues with Appium directly."

"There is always a concern about the amount of code that is required to enhance the automation process. The idea of having less code or no code is what we would like to see in future updates."

"We need some bug fixes for nested elements."

"It should provide reliable and promising executions every time without any interruptions and avoiding any synchronization issues."

"Configuration-wise, there is a lot of room for improvement."

"The initial setup is straightforward if you have previous experience with the solution, but it can be complicated for a novice user."

"Configuring the project to be used in Appium is a little bit tedious."

"Another room for improvement in Appium is that it's buggy sometimes."

More Appium cons

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source."

"We found out that we could explore features of the solution for 30 days trial. We can switch to a permanent license later if we want."

"It's completely 100% free, and there are no hidden fees."

"As far as I know, Appium is a free solution. It's not for commercial use."

"The solution is open source."

"The solution is free."

"The pricing of Appium is fine."

"This is an open source solution so it does not cost anything for licensing or otherwise."

More Appium pricing and cost advice

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Appium?

I do recommend Appium. It is an open-source solution and completely free of charge. We use Appium and Appium Studio as our base for any type of mobile automation for testing. It has a great interfa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appium?

My experience with Appium from a pricing perspective is favorable due to it being open source, making it a cost-effective option.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Appium?

The deployment process and configuration are quite complex and require improvement. Additionally, the wait time functionality could be enhanced as I experienced failures with longer wait times.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Appium

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs Appium

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Appium

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Appium

Compared 6% of the time

More Appium Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Appium

September 2026

Download Appium product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

September 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Overview

Appium facilitates seamless automation of iOS and Android mobile applications, interfacing smoothly with CI/CD pipelines and enabling cross-platform development. Its open-source framework supports diverse coding languages, enhancing test automation.

Appium stands out for its ability to automate mobile apps across multiple platforms, backed by a strong community and extensive language compatibility. It integrates with continuous integration and delivery workflows, with robust tools like Appium Inspector enhancing element identification. It offers an interface familiar to Selenium users and supports versatile scripting, easing the mobile app testing process for developers. While it provides scalability and simple connectivity, users seek enhancements in stability, speed, and platform integration, specifically with iOS and cloud solutions.

What are Appium's Key Features?

Cross-Platform Support: Enables seamless interaction with mobile apps on Android and iOS.
Programming Language Compatibility: Extensive support for multiple programming languages.
CI/CD Integration: Robust integration with CI/CD pipelines for continuous testing.
Appium Inspector: Tool for effective element identification in apps.
Open Source: Offers scalable and flexible testing solutions without licensing costs.

What Benefits Do Users Look for in Reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple setup and connectivity for streamlined testing.
Familiar Interface: Supports seasoned Selenium users with a common interface.
Comprehensive Automation: Provides functionality for end-to-end regression testing.
Community Support: Strong community offering resources and troubleshooting.
Scalability: Easily handles testing of apps at various scales.

Appium is widely utilized in industries such as healthcare, logistics, and construction for the automation of iOS and Android apps. Companies integrate it into their DevOps practices for continuous testing, using it in hybrid deployments and linking with tools like GitHub Actions and Jira for efficient test management.

Appium

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Nuvizz, Coupa Software, Eventbrite, Evernote

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Development Platforms

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Mendix, OutSystems, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.