Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
eDiscovery (6th)
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (9th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Trellix Endpoint Security Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is designed for eDiscovery and holds a mindshare of 2.7%, down 3.7% compared to last year.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 3.9% mindshare, down 4.1% since last year.
eDiscovery Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText EnCase eDiscovery2.7%
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery17.4%
Google Vault8.8%
Other71.1%
eDiscovery
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform3.9%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint9.9%
CrowdStrike Falcon7.9%
Other78.3%
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Alejandro Stromer - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup
The solution is scalable. It has three levels. You have the presentation area that can be escalated to the balance sheet. You have the back-end area that can be escalated using higher viability to configure more application servers. Also, the area of storage can be increased. We usually cater to enterprise solutions but have small- and medium-sized customers. It starts with 25 users and goes up to 100s and 1000s.
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies
There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"The solution is very stable."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"The technical support is excellent."
"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"The seamless deployment is very valuable."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to manage the solution from anywhere and having an overview of the companies security."
"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."
"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"Dynamic Application Containment."
"Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust access protection, addressing major concerns in prevention. It provides both application control and user access control within its access protection features."
"One valuable feature is Threat Prevention with the on-demand scan."
 

Cons

"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
"There were minor UI bugs."
"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"​Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process.​"
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"It didn't work well for some of the use cases. We have different use cases for each entity. Their support is also not good and needs improvement."
"Users can just install software into their computers. We need some sort of application control system that, if there are any pieces of software that are not whitelisted, then the solution could flag it or maybe alert the administers. That would be very helpful."
"It can be quite complicated to learn McAfee Endpoint Security and to feel comfortable with the environment."
"The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."
"It would be a lot easier if I could add multiple user accounts within a single device."
"The initial setup is complex. It is a very complex product. You must have experience with it."
"Some agents become old and then they don't communicate well any longer."
"Continued available training is important for people coming in to use it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"EnCase is an affordable solution."
"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
"​The product is affordable and user-friendly.​"
"The price of this product is good."
"I rate Trellix Endpoint Security a nine out of ten for pricing."
"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."
"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."
"It is not that expensive. There is no additional cost. We got the entire bundle together."
"I do licensing on an annual basis and this is what I always recommend to my clients over the monthly option."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
868,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
13%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business67
Midsize Enterprise36
Large Enterprise59
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText EnCase eDiscovery?
I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What is your primary use case for OpenText EnCase eDiscovery?
We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
 

Also Known As

EnCase eDiscovery
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
868,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.