Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
eDiscovery (5th)
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (9th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Trellix Endpoint Security Platform aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is designed for eDiscovery and holds a mindshare of 3.2%, down 4.5% compared to last year.
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), holds 3.8% mindshare, down 4.3% since last year.
eDiscovery
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Alejandro Stromer - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup
The solution is scalable. It has three levels. You have the presentation area that can be escalated to the balance sheet. You have the back-end area that can be escalated using higher viability to configure more application servers. Also, the area of storage can be increased. We usually cater to enterprise solutions but have small- and medium-sized customers. It starts with 25 users and goes up to 100s and 1000s.
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies
There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"The technical support is excellent."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"The solution is very stable."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful."
"Provides good mobile device protection."
"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."
"The solution offers very good endpoint security."
"HIPS protects server files from being modified or deleted by unauthorized users. It's primarily deployed in the web tier."
"FireEye Endpoint Security is easy to use and lightweight compared to others."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."
"The seamless deployment is very valuable."
 

Cons

"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"There were minor UI bugs."
"​Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process.​"
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"They could provide better integration capabilities for the product with other services."
"I would like this solution to do what Palo Alto traps does because I would only need to run this one product."
"They can improve its resource consumption, such as memory, and maybe provide better or smaller updates. It always takes a lot of resources, but it has been getting better. I have been using McAfee products for the last 20 years or so, and I know it is getting better."
"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."
"The solution takes up a high amount of memory and can cause the system to hang."
"Every time we open a ticket with McAfee, their response differs and they are not consistent."
"Its pricing needs to be improved."
"An area of improvement for this solution is to make it easier to manage."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"EnCase is an affordable solution."
"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."
"​The product is affordable and user-friendly.​"
"Since the maintenance is done by our own team, the price of the subscription should really be cheaper."
"No comment."
"I rate Trellix Endpoint Security a nine out of ten for pricing."
"For each computer that is connected to the server McAfee charges us for each computer based on our license agreement."
"Trellix Endpoint Security is an inexpensive platform."
"Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) has a reasonable price."
"The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year."
"Pricing is fair."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Performing Arts
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText EnCase eDiscovery?
I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What is your primary use case for OpenText EnCase eDiscovery?
We have experience in engineering and capital projects. It is an add-on to extend project and asset management documentation.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
 

Also Known As

EnCase eDiscovery
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText EnCase eDiscovery vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.