OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. OpenText is ranked #40, while Broadcom is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0. OpenText holds a 1.0% mindshare in CM, compared to Broadcom’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews

518 Views
435 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 10 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

1,574 Views
913 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenText Cloud Service Automation and VMware Tanzu CloudHealth are leading competitors in cloud management solutions. OpenText leads in pricing and support efficiency, while VMware is recognized for its robust feature set and perceived long-term value.

Features: OpenText Cloud Service Automation shines with automation capabilities, integration flexibility, and user-friendliness. It is ideal for diverse IT environments. In contrast, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth offers comprehensive cloud management features, including cost optimization, governance, and multi-cloud support.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its feature set and customization options to match broader management capabilities. It may also improve scalability and dashboard reporting tools. VMware Tanzu CloudHealth would benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing initial costs, and offering more intuitive user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides streamlined deployment and efficient customer support, which simplifies setup. VMware Tanzu CloudHealth has a more complex deployment process but offers extensive support options catering to detailed customization needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Cloud Service Automation is attractive due to its competitive initial pricing and quick ROI, emphasizing affordability. VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, while more costly upfront, delivers higher ROI through its comprehensive capabilities, making it appealing for long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Ranking in Cloud Management

40th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Management

22nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Cloud Service Automation is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 1.7%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth	1.7%
OpenText Cloud Service Automation	1.0%
Other	97.3%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

SunpritSingh

Test Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is. Traditionally, when we use a mainframe system to submit jobs, we have to see the spool or any error we might get in the spool. It is very command-based and uses a green screen, which is not user-friendly. Micro Focus enterprise makes it easy to submit and view jobs. We just have to log into the particular portal, go to the catalog and view any files we want. The same can be said about submitting jobs. We know what JCL we want to submit, give it the path, and then submit it with no command required. It is very user-friendly.

Read full review

Cláudio Braga

AI Software Developer Engineer at IBM

Improves cloud cost control and accountability but could explore further enhancements

The most valuable features of this solution include the drive for accountability because we can allocate cloud costs back to specific business units or teams through showback and chargeback. Additionally, reduced waste is achieved because we can identify unused or underutilized resources and receive recommendations for resizing instances. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's unified dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by unifying everything needed in one dashboard, such as metrics, instance workings, machines, and servers. All of this in just one dashboard is very helpful to improve agility and resolve issues, especially for the workloads. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth helps manage compliance risks by preventing threats, stopping attacks, detecting threats, and securing workloads or endpoints where customers will be using the endpoints. The positive impact on my organization is substantial because we can reduce waste, optimize expenses, drive accountability, and secure the budget from unnecessary cloud costs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

"The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds."

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"The pricing is rather competitive right now."

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"The solution is useful for cloud transparency and visibility in reports and dashboards that I have generated, especially the pre-populated dashboards."

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations"

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"Some companies may not be capable of affording this product."

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

"I would like to see better integration from CloudHealth to create easier setup and implementation."

"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

I do not see any flaws in VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. Everything is fine for me. The performance is acceptable, and the layout is acceptable. It is very user-friendly, and there is nothing that needs...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudHealth?

This product was used for financial management in my company because I was working for a FinTech. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's use case is related to financial control and resource governance across ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudHealth?

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's analytics in understanding cloud usage trends and expense forecasts is normally more for marketing staff and analyzing production servers in my case, so I am not very exp...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 36% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 24% of the time

Morpheus vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 18% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 11% of the time

Yuki Snowflake Optimization Platform vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 7% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

January 2026

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

January 2026

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

OpenText

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, formerly known as VMware Aria Cost Powered by CloudHealth, is a specialized cloud management platform tailored for Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization. It offers comprehensive visibility into cloud spending across various providers, enabling users to identify areas for optimization and make informed resource allocation decisions. With features like reserved instance management, resource rightsizing, and automated cost governance policies, it facilitates financial management for optimal cost efficiency. Beyond cost optimization, Tanzu CloudHealth enhances cloud operations through workload optimization and governance automation, catering to multi-cloud environments encompassing public, private, and hybrid clouds. Its primary focus remains on enabling organizations to effectively manage and reduce cloud expenditures while supporting operations across diverse cloud platforms.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.