OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. OpenText is ranked #45, while Broadcom is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 1.2% mindshare in CM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews

1,653 Views
1,471 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 17 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

5,496 Views
3,298 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenText Cloud Service Automation and VMware Tanzu CloudHealth are leading competitors in cloud management solutions. OpenText leads in pricing and support efficiency, while VMware is recognized for its robust feature set and perceived long-term value.

Features: OpenText Cloud Service Automation shines with automation capabilities, integration flexibility, and user-friendliness. It is ideal for diverse IT environments. In contrast, VMware Tanzu CloudHealth offers comprehensive cloud management features, including cost optimization, governance, and multi-cloud support.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its feature set and customization options to match broader management capabilities. It may also improve scalability and dashboard reporting tools. VMware Tanzu CloudHealth would benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing initial costs, and offering more intuitive user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides streamlined deployment and efficient customer support, which simplifies setup. VMware Tanzu CloudHealth has a more complex deployment process but offers extensive support options catering to detailed customization needs.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Cloud Service Automation is attractive due to its competitive initial pricing and quick ROI, emphasizing affordability. VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, while more costly upfront, delivers higher ROI through its comprehensive capabilities, making it appealing for long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,322 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Ranking in Cloud Management

45th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Management

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of OpenText Cloud Service Automation is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 2.2%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth	2.2%
OpenText Cloud Service Automation	1.2%
Other	96.6%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

SunpritSingh

Test Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is. Traditionally, when we use a mainframe system to submit jobs, we have to see the spool or any error we might get in the spool. It is very command-based and uses a green screen, which is not user-friendly. Micro Focus enterprise makes it easy to submit and view jobs. We just have to log into the particular portal, go to the catalog and view any files we want. The same can be said about submitting jobs. We know what JCL we want to submit, give it the path, and then submit it with no command required. It is very user-friendly.

Read full review

Sasikiran Sakalabattina

Sr Infrastructure engineer at TechMahindra

Centralized dashboards have optimized multi-cloud costs and improved financial governance

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a powerful cloud management platform, but there are areas for improvement. I would prefer to see more AI-driven insights that not only recommend optimization but also suggest automated remediation actions. Real-time cost synchronization could be faster, as billing data sometimes has delays. More customized dashboards and report templates would help teams tailor their needs better. Kubernetes cost visibility could be more granular for centralized workloads. Integration with ITSM and automation tools such as ServiceNow and Ansible could be enhanced. Simplifying initial onboarding and policy configuration would also improve the experience for new users. These enhancements would make the platform even more efficient for enterprise cloud operations. This tool is a mature and relevant cloud management platform with several areas that could be enhanced. I would prefer to see more advanced AI capabilities providing predictive insights and automated remediation for common optimization tasks. Better, faster synchronization of cloud billing and utilization data would enable near real-time cost monitoring. I want more customizable dashboards and executive reports tailored for different stakeholders such as FinOps, infrastructure, and management teams. Improving Kubernetes container cost visibility at the pod level is also necessary. I would prefer to see stronger AI-driven automation, faster real-time cost updates, more customizable dashboards, deeper Kubernetes cost visibility, enhanced DevOps integrations, and a simpler onboarding process as areas needing improvement. These enhancements would further increase operational efficiency and make the platform more valuable for enterprise cloud management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to tie the pieces together, supporting multiple providers across both HPE and non-HPE products, is crucial in a heterogeneous environment composed of many different commercial and in-house developed components."

"These products let us integrate multiple tools together and help to automate the processes by cutting down time and effort through the modules and reusable contents."

"Scalability is the most valuable feature to us."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

"We really look at infrastructure as a service as the major trend in IT, at least for a service provider like us, for the next 3 to 4 years, so we really want to have a precise, clearly defined, but very dynamic and flexible private cloud where we can easily provision and deploy infrastructure as a service to our end customers."

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"Customers do utilize a security and compliance framework with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth because larger institutions won't move forward without it, and they choose VMware to ensure a tested and foolproof secure environment that complies with regulatory standards such as VMware Cloud Foundation with its trust policies, making it quite good."

"The solution is useful for cloud transparency and visibility in reports and dashboards that I have generated, especially the pre-populated dashboards."

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"I appreciate the GUI interface of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, and it is very user-friendly."

"It's one of our core tools within our Zones Cloud Platforms tool bag, when we're looking at how we help customers optimize their cloud spend across their Azure and AWS environments today."

"With this, we have right-sized many instances, removed many unused EBS volumes, and unused Elastic IPs, and in that way, we have cut around 20% of cost."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"I’d like to see better monitoring visibility. We have to rely on HPE Technical Services to tell us when those challenges and problems occur."

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"Deployment has been extremely painful for the production environment. This was mostly due to the decision to use our internal Microsoft-based Certificate Authority (CA)."

"I haven't found very user friendly things, some are a little tricky."

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth can improve by introducing real-time cost visibility and alerting so that we can better act on that."

"If you are working with the OS you need help and other connectors to get more information."

"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

"Some companies may not be capable of affording this product."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"The weak points of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are that while the product is quite capable, cost can be an issue at times."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

19%

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudHealth?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is that the setup is minimal and simple. I have not been directly responsible for pricing setup in CloudHealth, bu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

They could improve the life cycle.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudHealth?

My use case for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is to integrate workloads.

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 10% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 5% of the time

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

Apptio Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 7% of the time

CloudCheckr vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 5% of the time

Yuki Snowflake Optimization Platform vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 3% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

September 2026

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

August 2026

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

OpenText Cloud Service Automation streamlines cloud management by offering scalability and flexibility, allowing businesses to automate processes and reduce manual intervention. This solution empowers organizations to manage resources efficiently and optimize operations.

By leveraging OpenText Cloud Service Automation, companies can automate deployment, management, and scaling of cloud services. It supports integration with existing workflows and ensures efficient resource utilization. Businesses benefit from simplified IT operations, reduced overhead, and enhanced agility. This solution allows for seamless cloud orchestration and offers support for hybrid environments, helping organizations stay ahead in a competitive market.

What are the most valuable features?

Scalability Management: Automates scaling of resources to meet demands without manual input.
Cost Optimization: Provides insights into cost management, reducing overall expenses.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with existing tools for seamless workflows.
Hybrid Cloud Support: Offers flexibility in managing both public and private cloud resources.
Resource Automation: Automates provisioning and lifecycle management for better efficiency.

What benefits should be evaluated?

Improved Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks and automates processes.
Cost Savings: Lowers operational costs through optimized resource management.
Enhanced Agility: Accelerates deployment times and improves time-to-market.
Operational Visibility: Provides detailed insights into resource usage and performance.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail successfully implement OpenText Cloud Service Automation to ensure compliance, enhance customer services, and manage transactions efficiently. The adaptability of the platform supports implementation across diverse business models.

OpenText

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides an intuitive dashboard, pricing flexibility, and accountability features, helping users allocate cloud costs, enhance security, and optimize expenses for improved cloud management.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth stands out for its comprehensive cloud cost allocation by team, ensuring expense optimization and increased security. Its compliance management, scalability, and competitive pricing offer significant advantages. The platform facilitates monitoring across multi-cloud environments and delivers cost-saving recommendations. Transparent reporting and robust support enhance agility and aid in effective issue resolution.

What are the key features of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Intuitive Dashboard: Simplifies cloud management with user-friendly interfaces.
Pricing Flexibility: Offers adaptable pricing models to suit diverse needs.
Accountability Features: Supports team-based cost allocation and tracking.
Compliance Management: Ensures security standards are consistently met.
Scalability: Supports elastic growth and resource management across environments.
Performance Optimization: Provides tools to optimize cloud performance and reduce waste.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Cost Savings: Identifies opportunities to optimize cloud spending.
Improved Security: Enhances cloud security protocols and monitoring.
Transparent Reporting: Delivers clear and detailed usage and cost reports.
Efficient Issue Resolution: Streamlines processes for swift problem-solving.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is extensively implemented for cloud expenditure management in multi-cloud landscapes, aiding sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail in leveraging dashboards for enhanced transparency and financial control. Users rely on the platform for monitoring health conditions, reporting costs, optimizing spending, and driving accountability through detailed analytics and insights.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Cloud Service Automation vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.