OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

OpenText and Parasoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #39, while Parasoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Parasoft’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

177 Views
147 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 32 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

1,955 Views
489 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and OpenText Business Processing Testing compete in software testing solutions. Parasoft SOAtest has an advantage in support and user satisfaction, while OpenText stands out for its advanced features despite potentially higher costs.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers robust API testing with advanced service virtualization, extensive automation, and CI/CD integration. OpenText Business Processing Testing provides powerful load testing tools, excels in handling complex business processes, and offers strong analytical features tailored for enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its feature set for complex business processes, improve its analytical capabilities, and offer more low-code testing options. OpenText Business Processing Testing needs simplification in deployment, better user interface design, and more streamlined CI/CD integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is praised for its efficient deployment, quick setup, and excellent support services. OpenText Business Processing Testing has a more complex deployment due to its feature-rich environment but provides comprehensive resources and detailed onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest features a straightforward pricing structure focused on simplicity for a quick ROI. OpenText Business Processing Testing incurs higher initial setup costs, but its rich features justify the investment for large-scale operations seeking extensive testing capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

39th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (19th), API Testing Tools (10th), Test Automation Tools (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

Quality and security improvements drive user satisfaction

We have many customers, but with Parasoft SOAtest, we just focus on .NET, Java, and PHP protocols and message formats. For deployment, it runs on-premise with Parasoft SOAtest. The transition from manual testing can be challenging, and it's the first time they're using automation testing with Parasoft SOAtest. For the tool itself, Parasoft SOAtest, I would rate it as great with an overall rating of 10 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"Technical support is helpful."

"We have seen a return on investment."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"The performance could be a bit better."

"In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 21% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 20% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 11% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

August 2025

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

August 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

SOAtest

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.