

OpenText Application Quality Management and Zeenyx AscentialTest are testing solutions competitors. Zeenyx AscentialTest gains an edge due to its robust capabilities in complex automation, despite OpenText's attractive pricing.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management integrates with development tools, enhances collaboration, and provides comprehensive test management. Zeenyx AscentialTest simplifies complex automation scenarios, offers detailed reporting, and supports powerful scripting for advanced automation.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve its user interface, provide better out-of-the-box integration with popular tools, and reduce complexity for first-time users. Zeenyx can enhance support for different environments, simplify its scripting process, and offer more detailed documentation for new users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest features an easy deployment process and responsive support, leading to a better user experience. OpenText presents a traditional deployment with strong support but less user-friendly initially compared to Zeenyx.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management attracts with competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious teams. Zeenyx AscentialTest, despite higher initial costs, provides substantial long-term ROI through superior features and comprehensive automation capabilities.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 9.0% |
| Zeenyx AscentialTest | 1.3% |
| Other | 89.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 162 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.