OpenText Application Quality Management and Zeenyx AscentialTest compete in the software testing solutions category. Zeenyx AscentialTest generally has an upper hand due to its advanced features, although OpenText offers competitive pricing and robust support.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management provides comprehensive test management and excellent integration capabilities, ideal for large-scale projects. Zeenyx AscentialTest distinguishes itself through its strong automation tools, user-friendly scripting for complex scenarios, and superior usability.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its ease of use and simplify the setup process to reduce initial complexity. It might also focus on further expanding its automation capabilities. Zeenyx AscentialTest would benefit from improving its pricing model and offering more attractive initial costs. Additionally, increased integration options with external tools could enhance its flexibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest stands out for its straightforward deployment process and exceptional customer service, which ensure faster implementation and effective troubleshooting. OpenText offers robust support but may require a more extensive setup due to its complexity, resulting in a slower initial deployment.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management presents a cost-effective solution, providing significant ROI for long-term projects due to its attractive pricing model. Zeenyx AscentialTest might involve higher upfront costs but yields excellent ROI through its efficient automation capabilities, making it a valuable long-term investment.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
