OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

OpenText and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while Zeenyx is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Zeenyx’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

1,471 Views
1,118 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews

1,101 Views
815 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and Zeenyx AscentialTest compete in providing comprehensive testing solutions. OpenText is favorable in pricing and customer support, while Zeenyx is preferred for extensive features.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers advanced mobile and web testing capabilities with cross-platform integration, load testing, and real device support. Zeenyx AscentialTest provides robust automation, flexible test script creation, and powerful object recognition.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance flexibility in scripting and integration with non-HPE tools. Its interface may also benefit from more user-friendly updates. Zeenyx AscentialTest might improve the complexity of its deployment, documentation, and the initial learning curve for users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing Lab is known for streamlined deployment and strong customer support, facilitating quick onboarding. Zeenyx AscentialTest offers a customized deployment model, which can be more complex but is supported by responsive customer service to minimize deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab is competitively priced, delivering fast ROI and strong customer support. Zeenyx AscentialTest requires higher initial investment but often offers worthwhile returns due to its extensive feature set, tailor-made for handling diverse and complex testing scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zeenyx AscentialTest	1.4%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	96.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Tobias Roth

Software developer at Weiss GmbH Softwarelösungen

Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration

The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"The ideas and possibilities that this tool has are incredibly useful."

"The product is easy to use."

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"Zeenyx AscentialTest provides excellent support for PowerBuilder applications, with very powerful and flexible object recognition, a highly visual drag and drop environment for creating application objects from snapshots, and tests that are easy and quick to manage and maintain."

"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."

"If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice."

"As a platform corporation a primary strategic goal is to develop coherent tests across platforms, and this is where Ascential Test shines."

"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."

"I have been working with different vendors in my role, I can say without hesitation that the Zeenyx Support Staff are the best group I've worked with."

"It's been really easy to automate the same applications TestComplete struggled with."

"I am a 30+ year IT professional and the level of support I have gotten has been unparalleled."

More Zeenyx AscentialTest pros

Cons

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"Limitations are found to be primarily in the ux of the tool; for example when in doubt one often right clicks in an unfamiliar product to get unstuck, and AscentialTest lacks some of these fineries."

"The product does have limitations on how certain project files are locked (checked-out)."

"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."

"It would be great if AscentialTest supported the license server being in the cloud."

"We did observe that aborting the test run of a test set in the middle of execution was taking a long time."

"It would be better if the support for Web Tables and Siebel Tables are readily available and made more simpler as they are encountered quite often while automating the apps."

"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."

More Zeenyx AscentialTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Non Profit

10%

Performing Arts

Healthcare Company

19%

University

13%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zeenyx AscentialTest?

AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zeenyx AscentialTest?

While Zeenyx AscentialTest has proven to be a valuable asset in our testing processes, there are areas where improvements could enhance the overall user experience. One notable aspect is the user i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zeenyx AscentialTest?

We use AscentialTest for automated testing of Powerbuilder applications via CI/CD pipeline with GitLab. We have fully integrated all tests in our CI/CD pipeline. Thanks to the integration, much wor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 6% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

March 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Zeenyx AscentialTest

February 2026

Download Zeenyx AscentialTest product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

AscentialTest

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.

Zeenyx

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

March 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.