We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Netsurion based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete is lauded for its dependable threat prevention and ability to reverse ransomware file encryption. SentinelOne could improve its automation, machine learning, and AI capabilities while improving reporting and integration. Netsurion delivers thorough and informative notifications and effectively identifies threats. Users praise its seamless incorporation of endpoint security measures. Netsurion should focus on enhancing weekly reporting, utilizing internet options for enhanced security, and strengthening threat detection and response.
Service and Support: Customers have been pleased with SentinelOne’s customer service. Reviews highlighted the support team’s responsiveness and efficiency. Netsurion's customer service has received mixed reviews, with some users expressing concerns about technical planning and the installation process.
Ease of Deployment: Users find the initial setup for SentinelOne Singularity Complete to be quick and painless, with helpful support from the vendor team. Netsurion's initial setup was described as easy, with clear instructions and packages provided. Reviewers appreciated the support and assistance from Netsurion. Netsurion guided the setup discussion based on business needs, making it easier to understand and implement.
Pricing: Some reviewers thought SentinelOne Singularity Complete is reasonably priced and competitive, while others say it’s costlier than many alternatives. Netsurion is considered a good value for the money and competitive. Users say the solution’s pricing is transparent.
ROI: SentinelOne Singularity Complete yields an ROI by saving money and protecting against ransomware attacks. Other users noted its valuable dashboard data and low CapEx requirements. Netsurion offers actionable intelligence and eliminates the requirement for specialized staff, saving time and costs. Its managed SOC component also delivered substantial benefits to organizations.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer SentinelOne Singularity Complete to NetWitness XDR. SentinelOne Singularity Complete is praised for its reliability and effective threat detection and mitigation, while NetWitness XDR has issues with slow performance and configuration. SentinelOne customer service earned positive feedback, while NetWitness XDR users expressed mixed opinions regarding response time. Users generally considered the initial setup for SentinelOne Singularity Complete to be straightforward, while some users said deploying NetWitness XDR is a chore.
"Its most significant advantage lies in its affordability."
"The most valuable feature is probably the aggregation and correlation of the different telemetry points with Defender for Identity, Defender for Endpoint, and Defender for Cloud Apps. All of these various things are part of that portal. We've wanted that single pane of glass for years."
"The Endpoint Manager is incredible; it has a very straightforward interface and is exceedingly easy to use. Pulling out and deploying different tags or resources is a simple task across various departments with different levels of security. The notifications are also simple and satisfying; it's great to see the bubble informing us which devices are compliant and which are waiting to update."
"The common and advanced security policies for threat hunting and blocking attacks are valuable."
"I like that it's stable. It's been stable for a long time, and Microsoft Defender has done a good job there."
"The summarization of emails is a valuable feature."
"The threat intelligence is excellent."
"The EDR features are valuable. By getting the EDR features, we have more control over the device. We have information about events in real-time and more protection against zero-day threats and zero-day vulnerabilities. We can monitor every event or action that a device is going through. We can get an idea if it is something malicious or if we have to take any actions."
"The most valuable feature is the way it captures the traffic, and it contains every detail of the communication."
"Ability to isolate the machine when there are malicious files."
"They have recently updated the features and the most valuable ones are the instant threat response, ease of use, web interface, integration, and easy access. RSA NetWitness Endpoint is very compatible with other solutions and technologies. However, they do not rely on third-party solutions and have most features built-in."
"The interface of this solution is very flexible and easy to use."
"It is stable. We have been using it for some time, without any issues."
"This solution allows us to locate the malware in real-time."
"The log correlation is good."
"It's a scalable solution. We have around five to eight customers using RSA NetWitness Endpoint, and we hope to increase the number of users."
"Singularity's threat-hunting platform is user-friendly, and I like the built-in remote access feature."
"The solution has helped reduce our alerts."
"The most valuable features are forensic investigation and ransomware prevention."
"The initial setup is very straightforward and easy."
"The deep visibility feature is valuable. It is helping enrich our IR team in their investigations."
"SentinelOne has helped us to improve our security by fine-tuning our current use cases and creating new ones."
"I like that SentinelOne doesn't use a lot of system resources or make the system slow. It also performs a full scan quickly—within two hours. It has an easy-to-use end-user GUI."
"It is a robust solution. It provides great visibility."
"The tool gives inconsistent answers and crashes a lot."
"When discussing the secure score, which includes overviews and recommended actions, some of these recommended actions are not applicable to us, particularly those related to Microsoft Internet Explorer, which we do not use in any of our environments."
"It would be highly beneficial if CoPilot could identify anomalies within the network and notify the IT team."
"There is no common area where we can manage all the policies for the EDR, third-party solutions, devices, servers, Windows, Mac, etc., but it's on the road map, and we ware waiting for that feature."
"The interface could be improved. For example, if you want to do a phishing simulation for your employees, it can take a while to figure out what to do. The interface is a bit messy and could be updated. It isn't too bad, but doing some things can be a long process."
"The price could be better. It'll also help if they can continuously update and upgrade the solution. Every day there's a new virus uploaded into the network, and we have to keep updating it to identify all these things."
"The logs could be better."
"The support could be more knowledgable to improve their offering."
"Its price could be improved. It is an expensive product. Its training is also too expensive. It would be great if they can have a better pricing scheme for the training."
"The solution is modular, for example you can buy the RSA ePack, which you buy as a module is not part of the conduit solution. They could include it and have it as an all-in-one solution."
"The contamination feature could be improved."
"The threat intelligence could improve in RSA NetWitness Endpoint."
"We would like to see the hunting and investigation features of this solution improved, in order to provide better visibility of issues."
"I would like to see Security Orchestration and Response Automation (SOAR) integration."
"When analyzing something, you have to click several times. It requires a lot of effort to find something."
"NetWitness Endpoint's blocking feature does not work properly - if there's a malicious process, it's not possible to kill it via a custom rule unless and until it's flagged as malicious."
"The area where it could be improved is reporting. They have some online reporting, but it would be nice to be able to pick and choose. When I'm looking at the console, I would love to be able to pull certain things into a report, the things that are specific to me."
"Their documentation could afford to be a little bit better communicated. A lot of times we have to look at things in the knowledge base, and much of that could be communicated better, but that would probably be the only thing that needs to be improved."
"The learning curve was a little steep."
"Singularity Complete's process stream has room for improvement."
"SentinelOne is causing a problem with the data service that causes one of our applications to crash randomly. We're still looking for a permanent fix, but we have implemented a temporary workaround that excludes that application from the scan."
"We have had one or two occasions when we had to roll back off our Windows machine. Then, we had an issue with SentinelOne where we couldn't let the client make contact with the cloud service anymore. Therefore, the integration with the Windows Service Recovery could be improved in the future."
"Having an additional logic layer could improve the solution, mainly because I run multiple systems with different layers. For example, if I'm running a very important server with this agent, and that server gets infected, I may not necessarily be sure that I want to shut it down right away. Maybe I want to isolate some of the connectivity but not do the entire security remediation automatedly or curtail network access type of activity."
"Singularity's reporting isn't that great. The dashboards could be more customizable. It could be better integrated with other tools. SIEM tools provide better feeds. Singularity is a separate product altogether. It does not give enough information to integrate with different solutions to correlate better."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
NetWitness XDR is ranked 40th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 15 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 176 reviews. NetWitness XDR is rated 8.0, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of NetWitness XDR writes "Beneficial single unified dashboard, good native application integration, and high availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". NetWitness XDR is most compared with Darktrace, ExtraHop Reveal(x), CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, ThreatLocker Protect and Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). See our NetWitness XDR vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
