OpenText Functional Testing and Zeenyx AscentialTest are products competing in the software testing and automation category. OpenText has an advantage in support and pricing, while Zeenyx's advanced features make it favored by those seeking enhanced functionality.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing is known for its robust integration with diverse development tools, comprehensive test management, and valuable automation frameworks such as hybrid and data-driven approaches. In contrast, Zeenyx AscentialTest excels in automation precision, versatile scripting options, and unique snapshot technology for efficient test creation.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its GUI automation and expand its mobile testing capabilities. Improvements in cross-platform compatibility and reducing dependency on specific browsers would be beneficial. Zeenyx could simplify its deployment process, enhance its integration with non-PowerBuilder environments, and improve documentation for newer users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers an easy deployment process with strong customer support, facilitating smooth workflow integration. Although Zeenyx has a more complex setup, it provides exceptional technical assistance and comprehensive documentation, aiding in a smoother transition and advanced post-deployment support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing features a competitive pricing model aimed at reducing initial costs to maximize ROI. Conversely, Zeenyx AscentialTest, while requiring a larger upfront investment, provides substantial long-term ROI due to its feature-rich offerings and operational efficiency.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
I would rate the support for this product a seven on a scale of one to ten.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The ease of being able to create scripts using the AI tools are the differentiating factors.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.1% |
| Zeenyx AscentialTest | 0.8% |
| Other | 92.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
