

OpenText Functional Testing and Zeenyx AscentialTest are competing products in the software testing industry. Zeenyx AscentialTest seems more attractive due to its comprehensive feature set that prioritizes functionality.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers extensive automation capabilities, integration options, and an easy interface for beginners. Zeenyx AscentialTest provides advanced scripting, cross-platform support, and powerful object recognition features.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing can enhance its scripting flexibility and increase support for newer technologies. It also requires improvements in its object repository management. Zeenyx AscentialTest could improve by simplifying the initial setup process, enhancing its documentation, and expanding third-party integrations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing is noted for its streamlined deployment and efficient customer service, whereas Zeenyx AscentialTest offers more tailored support during deployment despite requiring more initial setup effort.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing offers a lower initial setup cost promising faster ROI for budget-conscious businesses. Zeenyx AscentialTest, while having higher upfront costs, offers long-term benefits with substantial functionality leading to potentially greater ROI over time.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
I would rate the support for this product a seven on a scale of one to ten.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The ease of being able to create scripts using the AI tools are the differentiating factors.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.2% |
| Zeenyx AscentialTest | 2.0% |
| Other | 90.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Zeenyx AscentialTest offers a powerful test automation solution providing features such as object recognition and drag-and-drop interfaces to streamline the test creation process across multiple environments.
Zeenyx AscentialTest supports automation processes across WPF, web, and Electron technologies. It offers object recognition with snapshot technology and reusable steps, simplifying test creation and management. Its compatibility with SVN, JIRA, and Jenkins facilitates CI/CD integration. Especially beneficial for PowerBuilder applications, it enhances efficiency with robust data handling features. Although it could improve navigation and UI design, suggested additions such as cloud-based licenses and debugger integration are promising.
What are AscentialTest's key features?In industries requiring robust testing for dynamic environments, Zeenyx AscentialTest is implemented for data-driven testing and large dataset analysis. Its multi-database support eases the verification process, unifying objects, steps, and test frameworks. Integration from test database installation to automated report generation ensures efficient workflows.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.