OpenText Functional Testing and Postman Enterprise compete in the software testing category. OpenText appears to have the upper hand in comprehensive testing environments due to its broad capabilities, whereas Postman is favored for API-specific testing.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers robust object recognition, compatibility with various applications and browsers, and supports automation frameworks, making it ideal for complex testing environments. It primarily uses VBScript, enhancing its versatility for desktop and web application testing. Postman Enterprise is geared towards API testing, equipped with a user-friendly interface and features like request collections, making it suitable for both manual and automated testing across varied environments.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing struggles with resource consumption and stability, necessitating more system memory. Users also wish for broader support of programming languages and a simpler UI. Postman Enterprise needs enhancements in managing large collections, integrating with other tools, and providing advanced reporting capabilities despite its wide API testing offerings.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing can be deployed on-premises and in private clouds. Its customer service record is mixed, indicating a need for improvement in responsiveness and technical support. Postman Enterprise offers flexible deployment options from on-premises to public cloud, supported by a strong community and third-party vendors. While generally satisfactory, its customer service can improve in terms of response depth and speed.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is a high-cost solution, offering a substantial ROI over time through effective automation and support for legacy and modern systems. In contrast, Postman Enterprise is cost-effective, with its base version being free and open-source. Enterprises expanding its functionalities may incur additional costs, but it remains budget-friendly with significant ROI for API development and testing.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Earlier, I took one week for all planning before releasing some activities, which reduced to three days, sometimes to two days, which is about a 50% improvement in engineering efforts, time, and release cycles.
Faster bug detection has helped reduce production issues and rework, improving collaboration and reducing delays between development and QA teams.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
The documentation, community support, and onboarding resources were especially helpful for quickly resolving common issues.
The response time is generally good for enterprise-level tickets, and the documentation and community resources are helpful for resolving common issues.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Features such as shared workspace, role-based access control, governance, private API networks, and organization-level management make it suitable for enterprise collaboration.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
Postman Enterprise scales well for larger projects and growing teams, supporting centralized workspace management, team collaborations, role-based access control, SSO, and governance features for enterprise-scale use.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If that integrates with an IDE, it will be a game changer.
Better advanced reporting, deeper analytics for API testing trends, and more simplified governance management for large organizations would also be valuable improvements.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Postman Enterprise | 8.6% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 13.2% |
| Other | 78.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
