OpenText Functional Testing and Postman Enterprise both compete in the realm of software testing tools, albeit with different focuses. OpenText is recognized for its comprehensive support for extensive environments, making it a robust choice for functional testing across multiple platforms. Postman, however, seems to have the upper hand for API testing with its lightweight, user-friendly interface and scripting capabilities, making it ideal for teams seeking efficiency and collaboration.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports numerous environments, browsers, and technologies, enabling it to perform across various platforms. It is versatile with extensive compatibility and robust automation frameworks. Postman Enterprise provides a user-friendly interface tailored for API development, testing, and automation. It has solid scripting capabilities and supports various protocols, allowing for flexible testing processes.
Room for Improvement: OpenText requires improvements in speed and needs better object recognition and scripting complexity reduction. It also lacks compatibility with modern programming languages and has been noted for high memory usage. Postman could enhance its reporting, broaden integration capabilities, and improve its support for UI testing, as its focus is largely on APIs. Users have also suggested more advanced automation features and detailed error logging.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing favors on-premises and private cloud deployments, catering to organizations with strict data governance needs but facing criticism for slow technical support responses. Postman Enterprise supports public, private, and hybrid cloud deployments, offering flexibility with faster customer service and effective issue resolution, making it well-suited for dynamic API testing environments.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing involves significant upfront costs and licensing fees, posing an investment challenge for some organizations. Nevertheless, larger setups can experience a substantial ROI when manual testing is automated. Postman offers a free tier and budget-friendly paid plans, maintaining competitive pricing due to its open-source roots, often delivering good ROI with lower financial risks.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
If they can enhance it to have a database kind of validation like we have in ReadyAPI, it would be better.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Postman Enterprise | 9.8% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 11.2% |
| Other | 79.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
