OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Project Objects comparison

OpenText and Project Objects are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Project Objects users who would recommend it.

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Read 27 OpenText Project and Portfolio Management reviews

1,366 Views
656 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Project Objects

Read 1 Project Objects review

417 Views
317 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Project Objects

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Project Objects based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Planisware, Broadcom, Smartsheet and others in Project Portfolio Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,260 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Project and Portfo...

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (11th)

Project Objects

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (50th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2668566

Founder & Chief Executive Officer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees

workflow streamlines processes and ensures activities are completed properly

The most valuable feature of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is its workflow. The workflow is amazing and highly effective in streamlining processes. Additionally, it is used to ensure that activities are completed properly, as part of the typical project and portfolio management. It meets my needs as a good project and portfolio management tool.

Read full review

Massimiliano Faraon

CEO at Artesys Orion

Responsive support, good third-party integration, and offers hybrid-mode project management

There are a lot of features. The most valuable feature is the ability to implement different scenarios. For example, a big company can implement its next three-year strategy along the two or three main pillars of the approach. Each pillar is composed of several portfolios, and each of those is composed of different projects. When you define the strategy for the next three-year budget, you can analyze the impact of each option. Based on this, you can decide things like assigning more or fewer resources to a project. You can allocate generic resources, like a project manager. Then in the second stage, you can assign names such as who specifically will be in charge of a project. You can do the same thing with all of the human resources that are involved. It provides the capability of integrating with the Agile Scrum component module. There is also integration with third-parties like Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, Check Point, Jira, ServiceNow!, and others. There is the separation between execution from a technical point of view where the staff can work in a classical workflow, Agile, or a hybrid Agile. The project manager and program manager will receive the high-level information needed to keep strict control over the project. You are able to do whatever is needed from the customer's point of view, without coding. Configuring the platform does not require the writing of any code. This is something that is very important. As soon as a new informational structure is created, it will be immediately available for the business intelligence module. This means that you can perform analytics on it. The BI module is very helpful. There is no comparison between it and other BI tools that are available right now. The network uptime is greater than 99%.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a very detailed tool. As far as an enterprise is concerned, it gives you the flexibility to manage everything: portfolios, projects, finances, proposals, resources, and time... It takes care of even the minor details that need to be captured. The project management functionality is configured really well within the tool. That stands out."

"The availability of multiple integrated modules is a vital aspect"

"There are so many different pieces of functionality, and we use almost every single piece from deployment to demand, project, resource, and time management."

"Has a powerful workflow engine that allows creation of workflow complexities and processes."

"The data provided by PPM is trusted and is available almost immediately; without trusted data there is very less scope of any tool to be successful."

"Overall, they have a very strong workflow management capability. That's a very strong feature because then you can model any process easily. Whether it is a demand management process, a pipeline management process, or your project delivery methodology, it is much easier because of their workflow management capability."

"The portfolio management and the resource management are the key features."

"Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management pros

"Configuring the platform does not require the writing of any code."

Cons

"I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView."

"We had a couple of issues with stability or performance degradation about a year ago, around the time of the initial rollout. Since then, we've only had two unexpected outages that were quickly resolved."

"OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation."

"Sometimes features in PPM don't work as expected, or our users request a new feature. Typically, our partner vendor can deploy those changes. But there have been a few instances when we had to raise it with Micro Focus because it's beyond the ability of our partner vendor. When we raise the issue with Micro Focus, it sometimes takes time because it needs support from other customers using PPM, not just our bank. It goes through a voting system. Other customers need to vote for the feature. The features that get the most votes will possibly be added."

"They can make its UI better. Currently, the UI is a bit clunky."

"Reporting; need to be able to provide fancy reporting out of PPM, way it is done in OBIEE etc."

"I was not involved in the initial setup. I know that the project involved a lot of consulting that took a long time."

"The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions. The UI is not good."

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management cons

"A lot of companies are investing heavily in artificial intelligence, so more such features would benefit this product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is SaaS without a base fee."

"Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."

"A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."

"There is an additional cost for product support"

"We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."

"HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"

"Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

The price of this solution is reasonable. It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)?

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation. Additionally, strategic portfolio management and investment management s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Project Server vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 10% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 9% of the time

Bubble Innovator vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 8% of the time

Smartsheet vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 6% of the time

Teambition vs OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Project and Portfolio Management Competitors

SoftExpert PPM vs Project Objects

Compared 100% of the time

More Project Objects Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management

January 2026

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management report

Download OpenText Project and Portfolio Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

January 2026

Download Project Objects product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management PPM

No data available

Overview

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides resource planning, project delivery, and governance with an intuitive interface, seamless integrations, and powerful modules for effective project lifecycle management.

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management delivers comprehensive portfolio and project management, aligning with business strategies and objectives. The platform features seamless integrations with essential tools like Microsoft Project and Jira, offering powerful modules such as time, demand, and resource management. It enhances decision-making with real-time data visibility, workflow automation, scenario comparison, and customizable dashboards. While offering extensive financial management and the ability to model processes, areas for enhancement include user interface, reporting, resource management, and integration with cloud services. Users also aim for improvements in security and mobile capabilities, alongside upgrades in database support and API usage, seeking a reduction in coding dependency for a better experience.

What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?

Intuitive interface: Provides a user-friendly design that simplifies navigation and operation.
Seamless integrations: Compatible with Microsoft Project and Jira, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Powerful modules: Includes time, demand, and resource management for effective control.
Real-time data visibility: Ensures accurate and timely insights for decision-making.
Customizable dashboards: Supports personalized views for improved project monitoring.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Flexibility: Enables modeling of various processes to fit specific business needs.
Comprehensive management: Aligns projects with business strategies.
Workflow automation: Reduces manual efforts, increasing efficiency.
Scenario comparison: Assists in evaluating different project outcomes.
Cost management: Provides extensive financial tools for better budgeting.

Industries leverage OpenText Project and Portfolio Management for resource planning and project governance. Organizations deploy modules like Demand, Time, and Resource Management to integrate financials and forecast workloads. The platform aids in project management, demand consolidation, and value-based delivery, facilitating investment management, capacity planning, and workflow optimization. Customization aligns with specific needs, supporting project control, defect tracking, and comprehensive reporting. Clients utilize the system for resourcing requirements and staffing profiles, ensuring effective project lifecycle management tailored to industry demands.

OpenText

Project Objects is a leading provider of innovative project portfolio management (PPM) software.

Project Objects

Sample Customers

Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG

Kells, Co. Meath

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Planisware, Broadcom, Smartsheet and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.