OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Tricentis NeoLoad compete in the performance testing category. Tricentis NeoLoad appears to have the upper hand in some areas due to its user-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness.
Features: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering supports diverse protocols including web HTTP, Citrix, and Oracle. It integrates with Application Lifecycle Management and provides a centralized testing platform for distributed teams. Tricentis NeoLoad offers advanced mobile and API testing with an intuitive interface, making use easier for those with less coding expertise. It includes strong monitoring capabilities and a flexible testing approach.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering needs to improve UI responsiveness, enhance cloud integration, and provide better support for newer protocols like low-code environments. Technical support improvements are also recommended. Tricentis NeoLoad should expand its protocol support and offer more detailed analysis options. Improvements in third-party tool integration and more flexible licensing models are suggested.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is primarily on-premises with evolving cloud capabilities, receiving mixed feedback on customer support. Tricentis NeoLoad offers both on-premises and cloud deployment, recognized for its user friendliness but noted for needing consistent post-acquisition support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is highly priced, justified by its extensive features and high ROI in preventing downtime, with flexible licensing available. Tricentis NeoLoad is more cost-effective, offering flexible pricing despite feedback on high costs. It offers substantial ROI, appealing to price-sensitive buyers.
I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value.
The customer service and technical support for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is reasonable, not impressive, but provides adequate assistance.
The technical support experience is a bit limited due to this indirect relationship.
I rate the scalability of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) as ten when using a scale from one to ten, with one being low.
However, it remains quite stable.
It could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten.
It is neither cheap nor expensive.
The best features of this solution are easy scripting and broad platform support.
The scalable testing environment is very beneficial for my performance testing processes.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 10.7% |
| OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) | 6.0% |
| Other | 83.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.
What are the essential features?In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.
Tricentis NeoLoad is a performance testing tool that provides developers and testers with automatic test design, test maintenance, realistic simulation of user behavior, fast root cause analysis, and built-in integrations with the entire SDLC toolchain. With NeoLoad’s plugins, teams can reuse and share test assets and results from functional testing tools, analytics, metrics, and APM tools in order to catch performance issues early. With NeoLoad’s full tech stack support, users can test the range of mobile, web, and desktop apps.
Tricentis NeoLoad Features
Tricentis NeoLoad has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Tricentis NeoLoad Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Tricentis NeoLoad. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Tricentis NeoLoad stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its price, its user-friendly UX, its API support, and its scalability. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
Patrik B., Technical Lead at a tech services company, writes, “The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it.”
A Global Delivery Head at a consultancy firm notes, “The API support is much better with this solution, compared with the competition. Pricing for it is also more affordable than its competitor. We have used Tricentis NeoLoad and we find it scalable.”
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
