We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] and OpenText Operations Bridge based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that."
"This product can be customized according to the needs of any company."
"It is stable and scalable."
"It's a very good product overall."
"It has greatly reduced the number and duration of outages as support teams are notified immediately when something goes wrong or even before something breaks."
"I find the Micro Focus Operations Bridge dashboard valuable, including its instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure."
"The Performance Manager provides great insight into our systems' performance."
"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."
"The event correlation is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The preloaded rules and ways to monitor your systems are a must."
"The integration with the ticketing tool makes sure that there is a record for every issue."
"The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated."
"There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas."
"The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The initial setup is a little bit complex."
"The solution is overall "heavy", requiring multiple servers, even without HA."
"We are waiting for quicker release cycles. Also containerized upgrade, so that you don't have to bring a system entirely down to make a minor upgrade, in fact, or a minor patch."
"In a future release, we would like an improved upgrade process. When you upgrade it now, it first uninstalls everything and then reinstalls all the packages, which means any customization that you've done in the directories on the surface disappears."
"Remove the dependency of Java technology. This is a feature used for admin purposes to update the modeling."
"The service takes a very long time to start and it requires a lot of resources."
"The deployment of agents on new CI should be improved. There should be some kind of automation to directly deploy them from the console. It can maybe have some more AI functions because most of the other tools are going in that direction."
More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Asset Management while OpenText Operations Bridge is ranked 8th in Event Monitoring with 44 reviews. Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while OpenText Operations Bridge is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Operations Bridge writes "Good event correlation capabilities, promotes a self-service approach to monitoring". Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Operations Bridge is most compared with SCOM, OpsRamp, BMC Helix Monitor, Splunk Enterprise Security and IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
