ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs Spiceworks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ManageEngine Logo
774 views|593 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Spiceworks Logo
879 views|465 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ManageEngine IT Asset Management and Spiceworks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs. Spiceworks Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The technical support is great.""The auto-discovery feature has helped us a lot.""In my opinion, it is the MDM; patch management and deployment are the valuable features."

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Pros →

"It lets us know whether devices are getting out of date and tracked warranties. Spiceworks also gave me visibility in terms of what software was installed on each device and its status.""The nice thing about Spiceworks is always it's free. Monitoring of printers for low toner. Finding machines that have low memory or low hard disk space.""The solution is easy to use and easy to manage.""It's easy to understand.""Helpdesk and inventory are both equally valuable, and they form the true core of the product.""Spiceworks is generic and free.""It was easy to integrate Spiceworks with our existing setup.""The solution is very stable. It's reliable and efficient."

More Spiceworks Pros →

Cons
"The assets that can be discovered are pretty easy to manage, but there should be a better way to manage non-discoverable assets. Our development team works on bots and tests particular hardware. They have got different varieties of hardware. They want a feature for managing these assets within a warehouse kind of environment. For example, our IT has received 100 items, and they have assigned these items as a bulk unit to a project manager. The project manager further wants to distribute these items within his or her team. Instead of maintaining a separate Excel sheet, the project manager should be able to reallocate these items from within the tool so that we have hierarchical entities for the same unit.""The engineering area needs improvement.""The asset management tool is costly."

More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Cons →

"The SNMP sniffer requires a lot of work to get right.""I would like to see more information when drilling down into access permissions, assignments management, or tagging. When I click a note or a device, I should be able to see more details about the router and modem. For example, I want to see the version, downtime, availability, latency, etc. I should have easy access to everything about our assets at a glance.""One of the biggest ways in which Spiceworks could improve is by developing better and more automated workflows. For example, in another solution called ServiceDesk by ManageEngine, you can have levels of approval in the event that there is a request for new software, or when someone requests a VPN or WiFi connection. This kind of multi-stage approval feature provided by ServiceDesk does not appear to exist in Spiceworks, and it is one of their main shortcomings for me.""With Spiceworks, like, when I open the websites, I have to Zoom in. I need to zoom in on those websites sometimes because it makes it horrible to use.""The network mapping could be improved. Putting together an actual bonafide network map would be really nice.""They've also tried to integrate it with social logins, like Twitter and LinkedIn, and that type of login authentication has no place in a corporate application.""Once a device was recognized on the network, Spiceworks never got rid of it even after you took it off the network. You had to go in and manually remove it.""It would be nice to have remote access to the solution via a tablet. They also need remote control from a PC. Right now, to complete the technical support process, you have to have a tool to access the PC, and check the problems."

More Spiceworks Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its price is reasonable, but I wish it was lower."
  • More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product is free! Get it now."
  • "It's free."
  • "It might be about $300 annually for a bigger company. If you pay annually, it's better and cheaper."
  • "Seeing that it is a low-cost solution, I would advise you to go ahead with Spiceworks and experiment with it to see if you can get things working properly, especially if you currently don't have any existing service desk software in place."
  • "The tool is cheap."
  • More Spiceworks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want using these, but they require quite some expertise before you can use them. Then there are the ones that are not open source, the enterprise softwares and cost you some money, but on the other hand, they are extremely easy to set-up and learn. You can have them up and running in a matter of minutes. And then there are those which are completely cloud based. They can be free of cost or charge some money depending on the software. The good thing about these is that you don’t have to install any extra software, and it can be managed completely online but then again these have limited features and you cannot exploit them to the full extent as you can do with the open-source and to some extent the enterprise software, so I won’t suggest you to use these, because these are generally not the complete solutions and require other support software to achieve the same. Below I have listed the outstanding pros and cons of the various Network analyzers that you can look into Nagios Pros: Nagios offers an extensive set of collector plug-ins that allows users to gather performance and availability data from a broad range of operating systems, including  Windows and Netware Nagios… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:In my opinion, it is the MDM; patch management and deployment are the valuable features.
    Top Answer:The pricing is good. We have plans to buy the licenses and work with the whole solution. The solution is highly recommended. I rate it ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to use and easy to manage.
    Top Answer:The GUI must be improved. The GUI looks old-fashioned. The vendor must do some web development for it.
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 48 in IT Asset Management
    Views
    774
    Comparisons
    593
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    260
    Rating
    10.0
    10th
    out of 48 in IT Asset Management
    Views
    879
    Comparisons
    465
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    666
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    ManageEngine AssetExplorer is a web-based IT Asset Management (ITAM) software that helps you monitor and manage assets in your network from Planning phase to Disposal phase. AssetExplorer provides you with a number of ways to ensure discovery of all the assets in your network. You can manage software & hardware assets, ensure software license compliance and track purchase orders & contracts - the whole nine yards! AssetExplorer is very easy to install and works right out of the box.

    From network inventory and network monitoring to help desk software, and mobile device management (MDM) to cloud services detection, Spiceworks helps you manage everything about your IT workday from one easy place.
    Sample Customers
    TRA
    Broward Center for the Performing Arts, Symantec, Webroot, EMC, Pertino
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    University7%
    Educational Organization7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Construction Company10%
    Educational Organization6%
    Transportation Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    University6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise21%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs. Spiceworks
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs. Spiceworks and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ManageEngine IT Asset Management is ranked 11th in IT Asset Management with 3 reviews while Spiceworks is ranked 10th in IT Asset Management with 47 reviews. ManageEngine IT Asset Management is rated 9.4, while Spiceworks is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ManageEngine IT Asset Management writes "Stable and scalable solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spiceworks writes "Good low-cost service desk system, but lacks in automation workflows and categorization ". ManageEngine IT Asset Management is most compared with Lansweeper, Freshservice, Axonius, ServiceNow and Qualys VMDR, whereas Spiceworks is most compared with Zabbix, Lansweeper, ServiceNow, Freshdesk and ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. See our ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs. Spiceworks report.

    See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

    We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.