NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and NetMon compete as network management solutions. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is often considered superior due to its advanced features, though NetMon’s pricing is preferred by users.
Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE provides deep packet inspection, application-specific monitoring, and comprehensive insights into voice traffic, packet loss, and latency issues. These features are essential for organizations seeking detailed network visibility. NetMon also offers traffic analysis and deep packet inspection but emphasizes protocol and application monitoring. It features user-friendly dashboards and integrates behavioral analytics, appealing to companies focused on compliance and user session activities.
Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is often viewed as complex, with a high learning curve necessitating specialized assistance. Suggestions for improvement include enhancing the user experience, GUI, and software stability, and possibly adopting a modular pricing system to prevent underutilization. NetMon users find the pricing a challenge, wishing for better analytics and tool integration. Cost efficiency improvements would enhance its appeal.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, offering strong technical support and dedicated engineers. However, its complex setup often requires expert help. NetMon, primarily an on-premises solution, provides satisfactory support with fewer engineers needed for ticket handling, offering a more straightforward deployment and support structure.
Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is considered an expensive investment, seen as a "white elephant" if not fully utilized. Users recognize its ability to reduce troubleshooting time and enhance network uptime, which justifies the cost. NetMon’s pricing is competitive but still high for smaller companies. Its emphasis on visibility and threat detection allows users to achieve noticeable ROI through reduced issue resolution times and improved customer satisfaction.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| NETSCOUT nGeniusONE | 1.5% |
| NetMon | 0.4% |
| Other | 98.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 37 |
NetMon offers significant capabilities in log aggregation, traffic analysis, and real-time network insights. Its ease of use accommodates both entry-level and advanced functionalities, enhancing network visibility and threat detection.
NetMon provides seamless analytics with its real-time dashboards and advanced AI integration. The platform is designed for comprehensive monitoring and detailed analysis, making it indispensable for identifying network traffic, origins, destinations, and facilitating threat detection through lateral traffic visibility. Despite its powerful analytics and customization features, improvements in product integration, customer support, and pricing could increase its competitive edge. Connectivity, topology visualization, and server performance are areas noted for enhancement. Integration with protocols like Gflow and Netflow might alleviate agent-based restriction challenges. NetMon sends correlated data to LogRhythm SIEM for enhanced threat analysis and is used for tasks like traffic analysis and DPA.
What are NetMon's key features?NetMon is widely adopted in industries requiring detailed traffic monitoring and security, such as finance and healthcare. Its capabilities in traffic type identification and correlated analysis make it essential for environments where detecting irregular patterns is critical. It's utilized for network security through comprehensive analysis and integration with SIEM systems.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
