Liquidware Stratusphere UX vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Liquidware and Splunk are both solutions in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category. Liquidware is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0, while Splunk is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. Liquidware holds a 2.9% mindshare in DEM, compared to Splunk’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Liquidware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Read 3 Liquidware Stratusphere UX reviews

452 Views
452 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 75 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

7,605 Views
532 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Liquidware Stratusphere UX compete in the observability and user experience monitoring space. Data indicates Splunk Observability Cloud has an advantage in pricing and support, while Liquidware Stratusphere UX has a comprehensive feature set and perceived value.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud focuses on real-time data analysis, seamless integration with existing systems, and enhanced monitoring capabilities. Liquidware Stratusphere UX provides robust user experience diagnostics, in-depth endpoint visibility, and a strong focus on user metrics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud is noted for quick setup and responsive support, facilitating the adoption process. Liquidware Stratusphere UX offers flexibility and thorough deployment documentation, along with robust guidance. While both provide strong customer support, Liquidware's extensive deployment options cater to diverse environments, contrasting with Splunk's streamlined approach.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud features straightforward setup costs and quick return on investment, appealing to organizations seeking immediate benefits. Liquidware Stratusphere UX, despite higher initial costs, offers substantial long-term value with its pricing model and extensive capabilities, promising enhanced productivity and insights for comprehensive user experience monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Liquidware Stratusphere UX vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Liquidware Stratusphere UX vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), Network Monitoring Software (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Container Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Liquidware Stratusphere UX is 2.9%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 4.6%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk Observability Cloud	4.6%
Liquidware Stratusphere UX	2.9%
Other	92.5%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Featured Reviews

Manjit Chakravarty

Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Good performance monitoring, stable, and scalable

The main challenge for this solution is its lack of availability for training and in-depth troubleshooting steps. I have worked as an operations engineer, implementation engineer, and architect in India. However, the solution is not readily available to every customer. For example, if a company purchases a license and implements the solution, the BAU operation team may be unfamiliar with the product. The solution provides some free training and videos on its website, but it could improve its training and support for customers who purchase a license. Additionally, I have found it difficult to get support for production-related issues. The solution could improve its response time for these issues.

Read full review

Dhananjay Dileep

Senior Software Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Unified monitoring has improved end-to-end visibility and reduced detection time across apps

When we have too many detectors in place for one particular app, such as when I have created 50+ detectors through my account, the entire page becomes a bit loaded when creating the 51st detector, feeling heavy and taking time to load. Additionally, it throws random errors; for example, when we try to save one detector, it might throw some random error which is not even related, with something else being wrong, not that particular error, but the underlying root cause might be different. Sometimes the error is just "some problem occurred," and we are not able to point out what the real cause is. This mainly happens when we have too many detectors or too many alerts in place rather than a standard number. One more thing is in the alert rules; if we have a main general alert, and instead of creating a new detector, we are adding a new rule under one detector, when the number of rules also increases, such as when we have 10 or 15 rules under one generic detector, that again creates the same kind of problem, taking some time to save that particular newly added rule, and it might not save at times, just keeps on spinning. Those are the two drawbacks which I spotted recently; other than that, everything looks perfect.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like Stratusphere's login metrics. It lets you drill down to exactly what you want to see."

"There are a lot of customization options, such as creating your own tables and more. You have the option to make whatever you like and see whatever you want."

"Performance monitoring is a valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is dashboard creation."

"The best features in Splunk Observability Cloud are the metrics; I can see any logs or anything related to the server or services we want to monitor, and the metrics are a good function."

"Great monitoring of network devices."

"Dashboards help the application support teams to have a quick look at how their systems are running. It helps other teams as well."

"The product's deployment phase is good and very easy because it is done with OpenTelemetry for most of the parts."

"The maintenance of Splunk Observability Cloud is very easy; it's manageable."

"We utilize the APM and auto-detectors, as the core metrics and core alerts are available for us, which are the features of Splunk Observability Cloud that I appreciate the most."

"The features I have found most valuable are log searching and log analytics, both of which are quick features."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"The time taken by the solution for the data to load should be improved. It was pretty high in some instances. The latency for some stuff to load up was pretty high."

"The dashboard is pretty lackluster compared to its competitors. They need to look at the competition and adopt some of those features. Liquidware could make the dashboarding more user-friendly and integrate scripting into the product."

"The main challenge for this solution is its lack of availability for training and in-depth troubleshooting steps."

"I would rate Splunk technical support at six out of ten. When we have a problem and need to create a case, the response isn't quick."

"It is essential for the monitoring tool to deliver quick response times when generating analytical reports, instead of prolonged delays."

"Splunk Observability Cloud could be improved by having more integration with Splunk Cloud because at the moment they're two separate products. They're making great moves on what they call unified access; tighter integration is always a good thing."

"The out-of-the-box customizable dashboards in Splunk Observability Cloud are very effective in showcasing IT performance to business leaders. However, there are aspects that could be improved, such as linking dashboards to one another."

"It would be useful if they provided some help pages. If you don't know too much about the tool, there should be more documentation readily available. It would be useful if they had a help button embedded in the solution so you could ask questions and get answers."

"Splunk isn't an ideal tool for application performance management due to the extensive setup required."

"Splunk could be better integrated with configuration manager solutions so we can automatically resolve issues without human interference."

"Splunk APM's performance could be improved - at the moment, it's very slow and takes forever to give me what I want."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is based on the number of users. I don't know the current prices, but it's around four euros per user monthly. My customers consider it expensive."

"The price varies depending on our model type and the number of users or devices."

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"Splunk Observability Cloud is expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."

"This is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing is costly."

"Splunk offers a 14-day free trial and after that, we have to pay but the cost is reasonable."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ControlUp vs Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Compared 46% of the time

SysTrack vs Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Compared 22% of the time

Nexthink vs Liquidware Stratusphere UX

Compared 21% of the time

Compared 12% of the time

More Liquidware Stratusphere UX Competitors

Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Avantra vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Honeycomb Enterprise vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

December 2025

Download Liquidware Stratusphere UX product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

January 2026

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Overview

Liquidware Stratusphere UX is a user experience monitoring and diagnostics solution that is designed to give users the tools they need to optimize and control the way they experience their digital workspaces. This solution is an industry leader because it contains many powerful tools that are designed to give administrators the maximum amount of insight into the inner workings of and control over the workspaces that they are charged with overseeing.

Liquidware Stratusphere UX Benefits

Some of the benefits that come from using Liquidware Stratusphere UX include:

Access to detailed data any time. Liquidware Stratusphere UX enables users to access critical metrics and data at all times. It is constantly scanning connected systems and culling data from them. This data is always available at the user’s fingertips.

Insight into trends and actual user experiences. Liquidware Stratusphere UX’s data collection capabilities focus on collecting data that helps administrators gain an understanding of trends that relate to user behavior. These insights make it possible for administrators to understand where some of the pain points in their digital workspaces may be. Once they have these insights, they can take the steps necessary to remediate without having to burn time and other resources by engaging in trial-and-error testing.

Digital workplace experience monitoring tools. Liquidware Stratusphere UX provides administrators with the ability to monitor their digital workspaces on all levels, keeping aware of everything all at once so that no issues catch them by surprise.

Maximum flexibility. Liquidware Stratusphere UX supports a number of platform options. Users can deploy physical devices, virtual machines, or a hybrid option.
Share data and collaborate on workspace optimization. Administrators and their teams can collaborate on maintaining peak performance in their networks even if they are not in the same place. Data from Liquidware Stratusphere UX can easily be exported and shared as reports with colleagues who may be working remotely.

Liquidware Stratusphere UX Features

When users choose to employ the Liquidware Stratusphere UX solution, they gain access to many different capabilities. These features include:

SpotCheck capability. Liquidware Stratusphere UX is designed with tools that enable users to drill down into the infrastructure employed. It gives administrators the ability to find issues they already know about as well as those that are only just beginning to develop. This feature analyzes the entirety of the digital architecture, providing administrators with a complete picture.

Machine Boot and Login Breakdown tools. Administrators can utilize these tools to keep track of these two critical functions. If there is any lag when users are attempting to start up their devices or log in, this tool will find it. Users can then diagnose the root cause of the problem and quickly take steps to remedy the issue.

Process optimization features. Liquidware Stratusphere UX employs a number of features that enable users to ensure that their digital workspaces run at peak efficiency. One such feature enables administrators to de-prioritize applications that users are not really using. This means that digital resources are being directed toward areas of true need instead of to applications that are not relevant to what the user is doing at the time.

Liquidware

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

U.S. Defense Agency, Phoenix Central School District, Homesteaders Life, United Arab Bank, Rolls-Royce

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

Liquidware Stratusphere UX vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

December 2025

Free Report: Liquidware Stratusphere UX vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Liquidware Stratusphere UX vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Liquidware Stratusphere UX vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) vendors.

We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.