LambdaTest vs OpenText Silk Test comparison

LambdaTest and OpenText are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. LambdaTest holds a 5.3% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

3,439 Views
2,402 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

872 Views
544 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

OpenText Silk Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and LambdaTest are competitive products in the software testing market. LambdaTest seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive testing capabilities, which many find worth the cost.

Features: OpenText Silk Test includes robust test automation, compatibility testing, and load testing functions. LambdaTest offers extensive cross-browser testing, cloud-based setup for concurrent execution, and integration with CI/CD tools.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve in offering more flexible pricing models, better cloud integration, and enhanced collaboration features. LambdaTest might benefit from improving technical documentation, increasing support for rare device combinations, and refining its geolocation testing features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test efficiently operates with on-premise installations and provides reliable support. LambdaTest facilitates smoother deployment due to its cloud-based nature and offers flexible customer service options, making scalability easier.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test features a higher setup cost with reasonable long-term returns. LambdaTest presents a lower initial investment, potentially offering faster ROI thanks to its flexible pricing model and scalable nature.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

7th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.3%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Andrew Rorat

Automation Engineer at SoftServe Ltd.

Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation

We had a regression run every two weeks. During every regression testing, we had similar issues from LambdaTest's side, which was a huge problem for our tests, stability, and productivity. I had to call them every two weeks and spend two to four hours on one call to understand why this happened. The LambdaTest engineer we communicated with decided that he didn't need to fix this issue. So, I had to create a workaround from my side. This was the biggest issue I faced with the solution.

Read full review

SrinivasPakala

Director Consulting Expert at Cgi Deutschland KG

Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available

While we are performance testing the engineering key, we need to come up with load strategies to commence the test. We'll help to monitor the test, and afterward, we'll help to make all the outcomes, and if they are new, we'll do lots and lots of interpretation and analysis across various servers, to look at response times, and impact. For example, whatever the observations we had during the test, we need to implement it. We'll have to help to catch what exactly is the issues were, and we'll help to see how they can be reduced. Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are. The solution needs better monitoring, especially of CPU.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support services are excellent."

"The primary feature that has significantly improved our test execution times is automation."

"LambdaTest supports multiple platforms like iOS across different devices and enables real-time testing."

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."

More LambdaTest pros

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

Cons

"We get logged out of the devices if there is some inactivity."

"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."

"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."

"The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting."

"Their smart testing module needs improvement."

"There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

More LambdaTest cons

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"The pricing could be improved."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

34%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

I am not responsible for the payments, but from what I hear, it costs about $30,000 a month, which is quite expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

LambdaTest ( /products/lambdatest-reviews ) needs to improve its speed and memory because it takes a long time to load. The ease of installation is also an issue; they need to open up a few things ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 66% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 16% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Testsigma vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 51% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 14% of the time

Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 12% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

April 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

April 2025

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

Overview

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test

April 2025

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.