LambdaTest vs OpenText Silk Test comparison

LambdaTest and OpenText are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. LambdaTest holds a 5.7% mindshare in FT, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

3,057 Views
2,782 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

968 Views
726 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

OpenText Silk Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and LambdaTest are competitive products in the software testing market. LambdaTest seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive testing capabilities, which many find worth the cost.

Features: OpenText Silk Test includes robust test automation, compatibility testing, and load testing functions. LambdaTest offers extensive cross-browser testing, cloud-based setup for concurrent execution, and integration with CI/CD tools.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve in offering more flexible pricing models, better cloud integration, and enhanced collaboration features. LambdaTest might benefit from improving technical documentation, increasing support for rare device combinations, and refining its geolocation testing features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test efficiently operates with on-premise installations and provides reliable support. LambdaTest facilitates smoother deployment due to its cloud-based nature and offers flexible customer service options, making scalability easier.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test features a higher setup cost with reasonable long-term returns. LambdaTest presents a lower initial investment, potentially offering faster ROI thanks to its flexible pricing model and scalable nature.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

17th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.7%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 1.0%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Dinesh Saharan

Presales at Net Solutions

The tool reduces the manual effort needed and helps automate certain tasks for users

I won't be able to comment on what could be improved in the solution since I am not the one who handles LambdaTest. It is our company's IT team that takes care of LambdaTest. Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis. If something is perfect, it doesn't mean that it doesn't need to improvise or improve, like in terms of adding new features. There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.

Read full review

SrinivasPakala

Director Consulting Expert at Cgi Deutschland KG

Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available

While we are performance testing the engineering key, we need to come up with load strategies to commence the test. We'll help to monitor the test, and afterward, we'll help to make all the outcomes, and if they are new, we'll do lots and lots of interpretation and analysis across various servers, to look at response times, and impact. For example, whatever the observations we had during the test, we need to implement it. We'll have to help to catch what exactly is the issues were, and we'll help to see how they can be reduced. Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are. The solution needs better monitoring, especially of CPU.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."

"HyperExecute adds significant speed to execution, enhancing the overall testing process."

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."

"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"

"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."

More LambdaTest pros

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

Cons

"It would be nice to have an API for visual regression testing."

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."

"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."

"LambdaTest needs to improve its speed and memory because it takes a long time to load."

"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."

"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."

More LambdaTest cons

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"The pricing could be improved."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"I used the product for free."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 65% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 13% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 38% of the time

Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 20% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 12% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 12% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

August 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

August 2025

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

Overview

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test

July 2025

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. OpenText Silk Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.