Kronos Workforce Central Software [EOL] vs Workday comparison

"It's really easy to use and has a simple interface."

"Do it."

"The advanced scheduler helps to ensure proper staffing."

"It's really easy to use and has a simple interface."

"Technical side: The level of detail (building blocks) in configuration (setup) makes it scalable and secure on a functional level, as well as on a data level."

"Poor user experience."

"The flexibility in configuration is this product’s most valuable feature."

"Workday is easy to use. Timesheet and resource management are also easy."

"There is a lot of scope for customization with this solution"

"The business process framework is excellent."

"We use this solution to manage financials, payroll and recruiting."

"I would recommend the solution to others, owing to its stability."

"Workday beats them all; in my opinion, they are leaps and bounds above the competition, and part of the reason is that it is built with modern technology and has no legacy coding in it at all."

"I found the analysis features to be very useful for our company. I also found the modules installed to be aligned with our company's KPIs. These were the two features that stood out."

"I found the analysis features to be very useful for our company."

"The networking could use improvement."

"Poor user experience. Web based, but requires old version of Java on the desktop which is a security nightmare."

"Customer Service: 3/10 Technical Support: I would give technical support a rating of 3/10. A lot of the time, their technical support person did not understand the issue."

"Licenses are expensive."

"The networking could use improvement."

"The setup was complex."

"It does not integrate with some of the career management softwares, like LinkedIn."

"There is so much information floating around Workday that it becomes overwhelming to digest all of it."

"The product must include payroll features."

"The solution has some features missing when you put them in the test studio or Confluence Studio. I would like the tool’s coding to be easier to understand and automated. Most of the coding these days is automated. Any query given can pull the answer directly which can make the solution easier to understand."

"The cost of Workday is certainly not inexpensive. It's very pricey."

"Workday could give us industry-specific or vertical-specific solutions."

"There were a lot of issues. There were consistency or accuracy issues with the data we had, and every time we had to pull reports in Workday, it was difficult."

"The ability to drive more analytics on a customizable level would be helpful."

"The price is expensive."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing a six out of ten."

"By and large, Workday is expensive. It is based on the headcount. I'd probably rate it a three or four out of five in terms of pricing. It'd be like buying a Mercedes or a high-end car. It's expensive, but there's a specific value that you're getting with additional features and things of that nature. Using that metaphor, Workday probably tends to be more of a luxury. There are others like ADP that can do your payroll, your time off, and other things, but they don't do it as well."

"It has an annual subscription rate, but I'm not sure how it will work."

"Workday is an expensive solution."

"It is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is good from an HR perspective, although management gets upset after spending $500,000 a year, every year."

"I need to pay for a license. It is expensive."

"The solution is flexible in terms of pricing."