Kiteworks vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security comparison

Kiteworks and Fortinet are both solutions in the Email Security category. Kiteworks is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0, while Fortinet is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.7. Kiteworks holds a 0.5% mindshare in Email Security, compared to Fortinet’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Kiteworks

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

2,947 Views
354 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Perception Point Advanced E...

Read 25 Perception Point Advanced Email Security reviews

2,543 Views
2,111 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kiteworks

Perception Point Advanced E...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Kiteworks and Perception Point Advanced Email Security compete in secure communication and email security solutions. Kiteworks excels in privacy control and secure file sharing, while Perception Point offers superior email threat protection, making them suitable for different needs.

Features: Kiteworks offers secure file sharing, robust data governance, and user-friendly data management. It enables private content networks and two-factor authentication, providing tools for compliance and tracking sensitive information. Perception Point Advanced Email Security provides advanced threat detection, impersonation attack prevention, and malware scanning, utilizing a multi-engine architecture for comprehensive email protection.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance its administrative access features and streamline user experience to reduce reliance on technical support for complex management tasks. It may also improve collaboration features for better integration with third-party tools. Perception Point Advanced Email Security could benefit from reducing false positives and enhancing incident response speed. Additionally, simplifying configuration options would improve user experience for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks offers straightforward deployment with dedicated customer support, ensuring seamless integration. Its support experiences are consistent and reliable. Perception Point Advanced Email Security features a cloud-based model simplifying deployment but may require extra support for complex setups. Its emphasis is on ease of cloud deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks generally has a higher setup cost due to robust governance capabilities, yet offers significant ROI through enhanced compliance and data security. Perception Point Advanced Email Security presents a more cost-effective option with low upfront costs due to its cloud-based nature. For customers prioritizing email threat protection, Perception Point strikes a balance between cost and security, potentially yielding higher ROI in email threat mitigation.

To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks

Ranking in Email Security

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (16th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Content Collaboration Platforms (13th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (10th)

Perception Point Advanced E...

Ranking in Email Security

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Internet Security (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perception Point Advanced Email Security is 2.2%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Perception Point Advanced Email Security	2.2%
Kiteworks	0.5%
Other	97.3%

Email Security

Featured Reviews

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

GraftonCole

IT at a retailer with 11-50 employees

Provides strong email protection and accurate threat detection with effective multi-layer defense mechanisms

They run us through about seven layers of protection, and the reporting is excellent. I found it to be very effective. It has a very high level of protection with Perception Point Advanced Email Security. They continually modernize their surveillance. They use a lot of AI. They run it through several layers of detection, deep packet inspection, which takes a lot of horsepower. I just think it is a good system. Perception Point Advanced Email Security has helped address specific email threats within my organization. I get weekly reporting, and by doing that, I can go and talk to these people directly and make them aware of how many attacks they had and where the attacks are coming from and not only the source of the email, but what category of emails that they are receiving. With the combination of KnowBe4 PhishER, I think it is a good security process that we have in place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The benefits that Kiteworks has provided to its customers in terms of data sovereignty."

"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"The most valuable aspect of Kiteworks is undoubtedly the private content network. This feature is particularly beneficial for us. Furthermore, it serves as a centralized platform that enables us to track and manage our information exchange."

"We could see whether the customer with whom we shared a file had downloaded it, which was not available with GitHub."

"I like Kiteworks or Accellion because it's continuously upgraded. I also know that it probably works with a lot of clients."

More Kiteworks pros

"One of the most valuable features is the service provided by the incident response team. There have been cases where we have suspected that emails were fraudulent or something was suspicious. In those cases, we immediately contacted the incident response team through the platform, and we had a response in less than a minute."

"The Perception Point Incident Response team acts as an extension of our SOC team. This is very important for us. This is a benefit provided for their main product of scanning our emails. If Perception Point can give me IR, this is really good versus other products that do not provide this kind of service. Perception Point's service is great. They are very professional. That reduces the time that my internal SOC has to deal with my internal IT person. They just send an email to the IR team at Perception Point, who continues the investigation and blocks any emails, if necessary. This is very good because it can reduce a lot of time and effort from my team. It is like an extension of my SOC, but external."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to identify malicious content and phishing emails and reduce the workload we have to do in terms of security."

"After integration, the tool is very easy to use. I had a problem with scripts for one customer, but my team did the integration for other customers without issues. So, I think I made a mistake in my integration. Both inline and API work fine."

"Their security engines are very effective at stopping malware and potential attacks before they reach a user's mailbox. They have the best detection engine."

"We can use it to perform detection and analysis of emails. For any malicious content found in emails, it gives in-depth analysis reports to end users. If you log into the console, you can see in-depth detection and how it happens."

"One is the hardware-assisted platform that provides more insight into the threat scenarios. And the other is their instant response team's availability, 24/7, for identifying and responding to incidents. These are the two main things that everyone likes."

"The solution’s effectiveness when it comes to detection is very good. It has a very good mechanism. It scans our emails. It identifies any threat or phishing attempts and phishing campaigns as well as any bad reputation, servers, or links, then it blocks them. This is what I find to be very good about this system."

More Perception Point Advanced Email Security pros

Cons

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

"Kiteworks could benefit from enhancing the proposal knowledge base section, specifically regarding the type of work involved. Currently, the knowledge base seems insufficiently dedicated to this topic, making it challenging for new users to access the relevant administrative law. Improving the visual aids and providing clearer explanations could alleviate this issue."

More Kiteworks cons

"They could improve their anti-spam engine a little bit, because there are a lot of false positives. Sometimes, emails pass through their system but are spam. In terms of security and engines for malicious emails and antivirus, they're doing a good job. Their other engines can be improved."

"The only thing that can be improved in Perception Point is the in-depth analysis and attribution to cyberattack groups."

"This is an option to preview an email in their console, and that could be improved. If you open the preview, then it auto scrolls. Therefore, it is hard to look at the email when it is going to the next page or scrolling. It should not have the auto-scroll."

"There is room for improvement in terms of adding the DLP (Data Loss Prevention) solution, which would be a good option for Perception Point to look into."

"Integration and end-user interaction can be improved as the current system does not allow end-users to send back information to the platform, unlike Google Workspace or competitive tools like Ironscales."

"In terms of architecture, and I know that they're going to improve this, the solution needs to be much more redundant. There was an outage a month ago in AWS, and that basically stopped the service for two or three hours. Although in two years, this was the first time that something like that happened, our expectation from a company like Perception Point is that it should work with either a multi-cloud or multi-region architecture, to improve the resilience."

"They can do better on the spam. Today, Perception Point is not our only solution. We have two solutions, and they are the second in line because the spam filtering is not yet the best."

"To improve the solution, maybe a portal for end users to consult their emails would be helpful. The end user could access the portal and see their emails or events. They could also refresh the names."

More Perception Point Advanced Email Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"Pricing is lower in comparison to Proofpoint."

"The price of this solution was within our budget and I think that it will suit most SMBs."

"The pricing compared to the value Perception Point brings is super-competitive. They're not the cheapest in the market, but the value and the quality of the product are superior to anything else in the market, so we don't mind paying more for it."

"The solution is neither cheap nor expensive. There are no additional costs to the standard license."

"The pricing and licensing are very fair compared to competing companies in the same field."

"It fits every budget. It has a low price. I can't go ahead and sell it for any price I want. They are quite strict. They say, "This is the price that you can sell it for and this is the price for you as a reseller." That is it. It is not a lot of money. I will not become rich from it, but I like that they keep a standard for everyone. They are a fair company."

"We would always like it to be cheaper and save more money. However, we are getting the value from it."

"The price of the solution is high."

More Perception Point Advanced Email Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perception Point Advanced Email Security?

In Brazil, the dollar price affects the cost. Perception Point Advanced Email Security is about 50 percent less expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Perception Point Advanced Email Security?

Perception Point Advanced Email Security can be improved by increasing the speed of analysis and delivery. In some cases, we have trouble with multi-factor authentication emails, which take more th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Perception Point Advanced Email Security?

My main use case for Perception Point Advanced Email Security is proactive defense against advanced threats, particularly phishing, zero-day attacks, and malware that a standard filter might miss. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 16% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 10% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Fortinet FortiMail vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security

Compared 9% of the time

Mimecast Email Security vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security

Compared 9% of the time

Avanan vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security

Compared 8% of the time

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security

Compared 7% of the time

More Perception Point Advanced Email Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks

January 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

Buyer's Guide

Perception Point Advanced Email Security

January 2026

Perception Point Advanced Email Security report

Download Perception Point Advanced Email Security product report

Also Known As

Accellion

No data available

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

Perception Point Advanced Email Security is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced email threats. Leveraging cutting-edge technology, it offers multi-layered defense mechanisms to detect and block sophisticated attacks such as phishing, malware, and ransomware.

With its advanced threat intelligence capabilities, it can identify and neutralize zero-day threats in real-time. The solution also provides robust data loss prevention features, ensuring sensitive information remains secure. Its user-friendly interface allows for easy management and monitoring of email security, while its seamless integration with existing email platforms ensures a hassle-free deployment process.

Perception Point Advanced Email Security is a reliable and efficient solution that safeguards organizations against the ever-evolving landscape of email-based threats.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security

December 2025

Free Report: Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security report.

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.