Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kiteworks vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security comparison

Kiteworks and Fortinet are both solutions in the Email Security category. Kiteworks is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0, while Fortinet is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.3. Kiteworks holds a 0.5% mindshare in Email Security, compared to Fortinet’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kiteworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.
Kiteworks
Read 13 Kiteworks reviews
  • 2,796 Views
  • 308 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Perception Point Advanced E...
Read 24 Perception Point Advanced Email Security reviews
  • 2,527 Views
  • 2,148 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Kiteworks and Perception Point Advanced Email Security compete in secure communication and email security solutions. Kiteworks excels in privacy control and secure file sharing, while Perception Point offers superior email threat protection, making them suitable for different needs.

Features: Kiteworks offers secure file sharing, robust data governance, and user-friendly data management. It enables private content networks and two-factor authentication, providing tools for compliance and tracking sensitive information. Perception Point Advanced Email Security provides advanced threat detection, impersonation attack prevention, and malware scanning, utilizing a multi-engine architecture for comprehensive email protection.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance its administrative access features and streamline user experience to reduce reliance on technical support for complex management tasks. It may also improve collaboration features for better integration with third-party tools. Perception Point Advanced Email Security could benefit from reducing false positives and enhancing incident response speed. Additionally, simplifying configuration options would improve user experience for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks offers straightforward deployment with dedicated customer support, ensuring seamless integration. Its support experiences are consistent and reliable. Perception Point Advanced Email Security features a cloud-based model simplifying deployment but may require extra support for complex setups. Its emphasis is on ease of cloud deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks generally has a higher setup cost due to robust governance capabilities, yet offers significant ROI through enhanced compliance and data security. Perception Point Advanced Email Security presents a more cost-effective option with low upfront costs due to its cloud-based nature. For customers prioritizing email threat protection, Perception Point strikes a balance between cost and security, potentially yielding higher ROI in email threat mitigation.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kiteworks
Ranking in Email Security
32nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (16th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (11th)
Perception Point Advanced E...
Ranking in Email Security
16th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Internet Security (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Kiteworks is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perception Point Advanced Email Security is 2.4%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Email Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Perception Point Advanced Email Security2.4%
Kiteworks0.5%
Other97.1%
Email Security
 

Featured Reviews

Sukkanta Banerjee - PeerSpot reviewer
Two-factor authentication and .ZIP format make large file transfers very secure
The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth. Also, only the .ZIP format is supported because it is a very secure mode of file transfer, and that is why it is recommended. It also has built-in antivirus, so if it detects any malware it will quarantine the file and it won't be delivered. This is really important to keep the service up and running in a proper and secure manner. With people working from home, the data needs to be checked to see what kind of data is being sent. It has a two-factor authentication mechanism. For example, if a person with a particular domain is using Kiteworks and sends a file to a party outside of his domain, that external party has to go through two-factor authentication. The receiver gets a link that takes them to the setup of a temporary account, which will be valid for three days. The recipient will also receive a customized password separately. Only after all these steps will they be able to access the file. That access is only available to a person with the mail ID to which the file was sent. In addition, admins can see who is sending sensitive content, what that content is, and to whom it is being sent, and can track emails. One week of good training will give a user complete knowledge for using the solution. The system is very easy to use. You just click on "Compose," attach a file, and send it. It's very easy compared to Outlook or Teams. It's quite simple, even for someone logging in for the first time. It is very smooth and easy to send files.
Read full review
Fabio Amorim Araujo - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good detection and response capabilities
The solution is very easy to use. We don't have any difficulty with transactions. Finding information, customizing configurations, and getting support or documentation is simple. I don't have any negative points to mention. I would recommend this solution to others. On a scale of one to ten, I'd give it a ten. It's amazing for us—the protection, the analysis time compared to Microsoft 365, and the pricing are all good. We're using both solutions—spam and protection channels. Recently, we presented two-week results to a customer, and they liked them and wanted to buy the solution. Our feedback is positive. We're developing a strategy to increase sales of the solution. When we deliver executive summaries to customers, we present good news about our company and discuss how Perception Point Advanced Email Security can help improve their security.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."
"The solution can be used remotely; it's easy to upload and share files."
"The most valuable aspect of Kiteworks is undoubtedly the private content network. This feature is particularly beneficial for us. Furthermore, it serves as a centralized platform that enables us to track and manage our information exchange."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."
"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."
"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."
"We can see when people are sending things. We can definitely see who is sending to whom. From the administrative logs, we can see who is sending to an outside entity, and those logs are retained for quite a while."
"I can identify from which region our users are uploading or downloading files."
More Kiteworks pros
"The solution’s effectiveness when it comes to detection is very good. It has a very good mechanism. It scans our emails. It identifies any threat or phishing attempts and phishing campaigns as well as any bad reputation, servers, or links, then it blocks them. This is what I find to be very good about this system."
"Perception Point Advanced Email Security has helped address specific email threats within my organization."
"The most valuable feature is the technical support services."
"Perception Point Advanced Email Security has a correct price point and offers very good email filtering capabilities."
"One of the most valuable features is the service provided by the incident response team. There have been cases where we have suspected that emails were fraudulent or something was suspicious. In those cases, we immediately contacted the incident response team through the platform, and we had a response in less than a minute."
"The most valuable feature I have found is the speed of scanning emails."
"Their security engines are very effective at stopping malware and potential attacks before they reach a user's mailbox. They have the best detection engine."
"The most valuable feature is the hardware-assisted platform module."
More Perception Point Advanced Email Security pros
 

Cons

"I would like to see immediate releases of fixes because now it takes at least a week. If that time span can be reduced to one day or two days, that would be very helpful for users so that things are sorted and transactions work smoothly."
"We have experienced a few hiccups and bugs when using the admin console and from a user perspective."
"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."
"File location could be improved."
"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."
"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."
"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."
"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."
More Kiteworks cons
"In terms of architecture, and I know that they're going to improve this, the solution needs to be much more redundant. There was an outage a month ago in AWS, and that basically stopped the service for two or three hours. Although in two years, this was the first time that something like that happened, our expectation from a company like Perception Point is that it should work with either a multi-cloud or multi-region architecture, to improve the resilience."
"Coming from products in the Microsoft stack, Perception Point doesn't really give you, as an admin, a lot of options to make changes yourself. It's more on their side to make changes in the back end. That's something they could improve on in the future."
"They need more customer engagement. The product works very well. The IR works very well when we contact them. However, day-to-day, they should have more in communication with their customers explaining new products and features. There is possibly something that if I would know about it, then I would buy and use it. Maybe I need it. They need to improve their communications."
"Integration and end-user interaction can be improved as the current system does not allow end-users to send back information to the platform, unlike Google Workspace or competitive tools like Ironscales."
"They could improve their anti-spam engine a little bit, because there are a lot of false positives. Sometimes, emails pass through their system but are spam. In terms of security and engines for malicious emails and antivirus, they're doing a good job. Their other engines can be improved."
"Its websites for analysis need to be a bit more approachable for people who are less technical. Technically, it is a fire-and-forget solution. So, you want to be able to implement this solution for a lot of companies who don't have security operation teams (SOCs) behind them. You need to have something where a secretary can jump onto this console and release whatever she needs to release. Therefore, it needs to be written in a very specific non-technical language."
"To improve the solution, maybe a portal for end users to consult their emails would be helpful. The end user could access the portal and see their emails or events. They could also refresh the names."
"Our users would like the solution to scan outgoing emails. So, if my system is compromised, and I have malicious content in my system, then there is a possibility that I am sending a colleague that malicious content."
More Perception Point Advanced Email Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."
"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."
"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."
"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."
"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."
"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."
"We would always like it to be cheaper and save more money. However, we are getting the value from it."
"They are not the most expensive vendor. There are much more expensive vendors. They are not cheap, but they are not the most expensive. They are somewhere in the middle."
"It fits every budget. It has a low price. I can't go ahead and sell it for any price I want. They are quite strict. They say, "This is the price that you can sell it for and this is the price for you as a reseller." That is it. It is not a lot of money. I will not become rich from it, but I like that they keep a standard for everyone. They are a fair company."
"The solution is neither cheap nor expensive. There are no additional costs to the standard license."
"In Brazil, the dollar price affects the cost. Perception Point Advanced Email Security is about 50 percent less expensive."
"We were able to get reasonable pricing that matches the ROI we want, so I think that it is the correct price point."
"If a user only wants protection for email, then the price of the product is okay, but if they opt for the collaboration options offered by the product, then it becomes a little expensive."
"The pricing was fair in comparison with the other solutions. We have received good value for what we paid."
More Perception Point Advanced Email Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Retailer
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is Kiteworks?
Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kiteworks?
I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifi...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?
Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...
See all answers
What do you like most about Perception Point Advanced Email Security?
The most valuable feature is the technical support services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perception Point Advanced Email Security?
In Brazil, the dollar price affects the cost. Perception Point Advanced Email Security is about 50 percent less expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Perception Point Advanced Email Security?
Maybe a couple of improvements on their portal would be good, but other than that, I think it is good.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks Logo
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks
Compared 35% of the time
SharePoint vs Kiteworks Logo
SharePoint vs Kiteworks
Compared 12% of the time
FileCloud vs Kiteworks Logo
FileCloud vs Kiteworks
Compared 8% of the time
GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks Logo
GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks
Compared 7% of the time
Box vs Kiteworks Logo
Box vs Kiteworks
Compared 7% of the time
More Kiteworks Competitors
Fortinet FortiMail vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security Logo
Fortinet FortiMail vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security
Compared 14% of the time
Fortinet FortiMail Cloud vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security Logo
Fortinet FortiMail Cloud vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security
Compared 10% of the time
Avanan vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security Logo
Avanan vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security
Compared 10% of the time
Mimecast Email Security vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security Logo
Mimecast Email Security vs Perception Point Advanced Email Security
Compared 8% of the time
More Perception Point Advanced Email Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Kiteworks
September 2025
Kiteworks reportDownload Kiteworks product report
Buyer's Guide
Perception Point Advanced Email Security
September 2025
Perception Point Advanced Email Security reportDownload Perception Point Advanced Email Security product report
 

Also Known As

Accellion
No data available
 

Overview

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Kiteworks

Perception Point Advanced Email Security is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced email threats. Leveraging cutting-edge technology, it offers multi-layered defense mechanisms to detect and block sophisticated attacks such as phishing, malware, and ransomware. 

With its advanced threat intelligence capabilities, it can identify and neutralize zero-day threats in real-time. The solution also provides robust data loss prevention features, ensuring sensitive information remains secure. Its user-friendly interface allows for easy management and monitoring of email security, while its seamless integration with existing email platforms ensures a hassle-free deployment process. 

Perception Point Advanced Email Security is a reliable and efficient solution that safeguards organizations against the ever-evolving landscape of email-based threats.

Fortinet
 

Sample Customers

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security
September 2025
Free Report: Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Kiteworks vs. Perception Point Advanced Email Security report.
See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.