Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Kaspersky Total Security compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has the upper hand in integration with other Microsoft services, while Kaspersky Total Security leads in comprehensive protection features.
Features: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is recognized for its seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, including advanced threat analytics and automated response capabilities. Kaspersky Total Security is known for its multi-layered protection, tools like a password manager, and parental controls.
Room for Improvement:User reviews suggest that Microsoft Defender for Endpoint could benefit from enhanced malware detection rates, more frequent updates, and a more user-friendly interface. Kaspersky Total Security users indicate a desire for a lighter impact on system performance, faster scan times, and better mobile device protection.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is noted for its smooth deployment process within Microsoft-centric environments and responsive customer service. Kaspersky Total Security’s deployment is straightforward but may require more initial configuration, with support that users find consistently helpful.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is often highlighted for its cost-effectiveness when integrated into existing Microsoft subscriptions, offering significant ROI. Kaspersky Total Security, while slightly more expensive, is valued for its extensive features and overall protection quality.
Kaspersky Total Security provides a good return on investment by improving data security and reducing costs by sixty percent with its robust security features.
Without detection and protection measures, organizations would face substantial payments and reputational damage, including the necessity to inform customers about data breaches, potentially leading to loss of business.
We have seen a return on investment when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, as it saves labor by reducing the need for staff to focus on it.
The biggest return on investment for me when using Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is the time saving.
I rate them an eight out of ten for their support in deploying Total Security.
The Microsoft agent, who did not actually work for Microsoft, is one of the vendors that Microsoft uses for support, said, 'Just to set expectations, my lunch break is in an hour and I am going to go away then.'
The level-one support seems disconnected from subject matter experts.
I rate Microsoft support 10 out of 10.
We managed to scale it out in a short amount of time, with two months of planning and three months of implementation on 10,000 computers.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is scalable enough to handle various devices across environments, whether they are laptops, Android devices, or operating in hybrid environments.
Compatibility is its main feature.
We have not experienced any issues with Kaspersky Total Security as we manage their entire IT infrastructure.
I haven't seen any outages with Microsoft.
I rate Defender 10 out of 10 for stability.
Defender for Endpoint is extremely stable.
The only area for improvement is the price, which is slightly high.
The system can be demanding on resources, making devices busy when running the client application.
Repeated interactions are necessary due to Level One's lack of tools and knowledge, hindering efficient problem-solving and negatively impacting our experience with Microsoft support.
In contrast, competing products offer reduced pricing for long-term commitments, which makes it difficult for us in that environment.
We use Microsoft partners to help govern the platform, and as part of an alliance, we want to gather data from each tenant and combine them for a complete view.
The pricing for Kaspersky Total Security is quite affordable.
That has been the trend we have seen with Microsoft lately—it is just getting more and more expensive.
Given our extensive Microsoft licensing, transitioning to Defender for Endpoint did not affect licensing costs.
It costs $15 per VM for the P2 plan, which is seen as affordable for customers.
The solution offers endpoint protection by scanning and alerting to viruses in the organization without physical inspection, increasing efficiency by stopping unwanted applications running in the background.
Kaspersky Total Security is a lightweight solution that does not slow down Windows.
Defender for Endpoint's coverage across different platforms in our environment is pretty good. We have devices running Linux, Mac OS, Windows, iOS, and Android. It covers all of them.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides a unified management interface allowing customers to manage their on-premises and hybrid infrastructures from a single pane.
One of the best features of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is its database for identifying zero-day attacks or malware attacks.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 8.7% |
| Kaspersky Total Security | 1.3% |
| Other | 90.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 80 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 40 |
| Large Enterprise | 92 |
Kaspersky Total Security provides robust antivirus and malware protection, comprehensive security for banking systems, infrastructure, endpoints, and personal devices including antivirus, firewall, and VPN services.
Kaspersky Total Security is a multi-faceted solution featuring antivirus, firewall, VPN services, and protection for personal devices, company laptops, and critical data. It is utilized for patching, managing vulnerabilities, and safeguarding against threats from USB drives and harmful websites. With features like anti-spam for Microsoft Exchange Server and secure web browser modes for online banking, Kaspersky offers comprehensive protection for personal and business use. Additionally, its combination of machine learning, AI, and reliable intrusion prevention makes it a preferred choice for many users.
What are the most important features of Kaspersky Total Security?Kaspersky Total Security is implemented across diverse industries to fortify banking systems, infrastructure, and endpoints. It protects personal devices, company laptops, and sensitive data, ensuring a safe digital environment for users. Industries rely on its anti-spam features for secure communication and its secure browser modes for safe online banking. Kaspersky's superior intrusion prevention and automated threat recognition powered by AI and machine learning enhance industry-specific cybersecurity measures.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for organizations. It offers real-time protection against various types of cyber threats, including malware, viruses, ransomware, and phishing attacks.
With its powerful machine-learning capabilities, it can detect and block sophisticated attacks before they can cause any harm. The solution also includes endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities, allowing organizations to quickly investigate and respond to security incidents. It provides detailed insights into the attack timeline, enabling security teams to understand the scope and impact of an incident.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also offers proactive threat hunting, allowing organizations to proactively search for and identify potential threats within their network. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft security solutions, such as Microsoft Defender XDR, to provide a unified and holistic security approach. With its centralized management console, organizations can easily deploy, configure, and monitor the security solution across their entire network.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a robust and scalable security solution that helps organizations protect their endpoints and data from evolving cyber threats.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
